Literature DB >> 30407293

Clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with upper third gastric cancer following radical surgical treatment: A retrospective cohort study.

Xiaoming Ma1, Wei Zhou, Cheng Wang, Wei Miao, Ning Liu, Shigui Wang, Shihao Guan.   

Abstract

The incidences of upper third gastric cancer (UTGC) have been increasing. However, the prognostic factors for UTGC following radical surgical treatment remains largely unknown. This study was to investigate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), lymph node metastasis and recurrence of UTGC.Clinicopathologic data of 126 UTGC patients who underwent radical surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. OS and univariate analysis were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the significance of the difference between curves was calculated with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the prognostic accuracy.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for patients with UTGC were 81%, 47.6%, and 38.6% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor size (P = .019), tumor invasion depth (P < .001), and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) were the risk factors for 5-year OS. Multivariate analysis identified tumor invasion depth (P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. In addition, ROC curve analysis showed that tumor invasion depth (P = .017) or lymph node metastasis (P = .001) alone showed significantly effective prognosis for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. For UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis, tumor size (P = .023), lym embolism (P = .003), tumor invasion depth (P = .002), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .004) were the risk factors for the 5-year OS. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (P = .048), lym embolism (P = .032), tumor invasion depth (P = .004), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .031) as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS. For UTGC patients with distant metastasis or tumor recurrence, univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS.The results suggested that for UPGC patients undergoing the radical surgical treatment, tumor invasion depth and/or lymph node metastasis are the independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and tumor recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30407293      PMCID: PMC6250511          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer in the world [ and the second most common cancer in China.[ It is well-known that GC incidence varies with different geographic regions. Qinghai Province in the North-Western China is one of the provinces with the highest gastric cancer incidence and mortality in China.[ Although the incidence of GC has recently plateaued, the frequency of the upper third GC (UTGC), also defined as gastric cancer in the upper third (cardiac area) of the stomach or gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach, has increased worldwide.[ Regional incidences of UTGC are variable.[ The West countries has relatively higher proportions of UTGC compared with Asian countries.[ Some studies have reported an increasing trend in the incidence of UTGC in Japan, China, and Korea.[ The incidences of UTGC in different parts of China are also variable. The northern parts has relatively higher rate of UTGC compared with the southern parts.[ Some studies in both Western and Eastern countries have reported a poorer prognosis with UTGC.[ Others, however, found that the prognosis of patients with UTGC was no poorer than that of patients with middle and lower GC in each equal TNM stage.[ These discrepancies prompted us to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of UTGC. In this study, we retrospectively examined the clinicopathological changes and the potential prognostic factors of UTGC patients who underwent radical surgical treatment from August 2008 to July 2013 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, China.

Materials and methods

Patients

A total of 126 patients with UTGC who underwent the radical surgical treatment from August 2008 to July 2013 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University (Xining, China) were retrospectively analyzed. The pathologic diagnosis and classification of UTGC were based on the Guidelines of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.[ Lymph node metastasis was evaluated using the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification system.[ Preoperative evaluation included endoscopic examination with biopsy and computed tomography (CT). Clinical lymph node metastasis was diagnosed by CT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered within 8 weeks of surgery to 20 patients with tumors that had invaded deeper than the subserosal layer, in addition to lymph node metastasis. This study was approved by the Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Operative procedures

All patients underwent radical resection (complete removal of the tumor with microscopic examination of margins showing no tumor cells). Radical lymph node dissection was performed D1 in 18 patients and D2 in 108 cases. Total gastrectomy combined with splenectomy was performed in 4 cases, simple total gastrectomy in 10 cases, proximal gastric resection combined with splenectomy in 11 cases, proximal resection in 101 cases. All operations were conducted by the surgeons with over 10 years of experiences.

Follow-up

Postoperative follow-up was conducted by telephone and outpatient examinations every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for the second year, and annually thereafter until at least 5 years after the operation or the date of the patient's death. As of April 2, 2018, the percentage of follow-up was 95.2% (120/126).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the prognostic accuracy. Pearson χ test and Fisher exact test were applied for categorical variables; continuous variables were analyzed by the student t test. Survival and univariate analysis were determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and the significance of the difference between curves was calculated with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform multivariate analysis. All statistical analyses were 2-sided, and P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with UTGC

Demographically, there were 113 (89.7%) males and 13 (10.3%) females in a total of 126 UTGC patients who underwent radical operation (Table 1). There were 5 cases less than or equal to 44 years old, 35 in 45 to 59 years old, 86 equal to or more than 60 years old. Macroscopically, 7 cases had the tumor diameter of less than or equal to 5 cm and 49 cases of more than 5 cm. There were only 9 cases (7.1%) in early stage, 24 (19.0%) in progressive stage (Borrmann1 + 2), and 93 (73.9%) in invasive type (Borrmann3 + 4). Histologically, 111 tumors were differentiated and 15 were undifferentiated. T1 tumors were found in 8 patients (6.3%), T2 in 67 patients (53.2%), and T3 in 24 (19.0%) and T4 in 27 (21.5%). At least 15 lymph nodes were examined pathologically in all patients. Lymph node involvement was detected in 73 patients. According to the UICC TNM classification system, 52 patients were N1, 19 were N2, and 2 were N3.
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of UTGC and univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS of UTGC.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of UTGC and univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS of UTGC.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with UTGC undergoing radical surgical treatment

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for patients with UTGC were 81%, 47.6%, and 38.6% respectively. Univariate analysis was employed to estimate the clinical factors affecting the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. As described in Table 1, no differences in 5-year OS were found in terms of sex, ages, macroscopic types, histological type, tumor growth types, lym embolism, venous infiltration, and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, tumor size (P = .019), tumor invasion depth (P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) were risk factors for 5-year OS (Table 1 and Figs. 1–3). Five-year OS for tumor size of ≤5 and > 5 cm were 47.8% and 24.4% respectively. Five-year OS for T1, T2, T3, and T4 were 94.4%, 90.1%, 71.2%, and 49.4% respectively. 5-year OS for N0, N1, N2, and N3 were 61.9%, 31.5%, 21.4%, and 10.0% respectively. To further identify the independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS rates in patients with UTGC, all risk factors for 5-year OS identified by univariate analysis were underwent multivariate Cox regression analysis. As shown in Table 2, tumor invasion depth (relative risk, RR, 1.536; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.403–1.682; P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (RR, 1.811; 95% CI, 1.592–2.059; P < .001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC.
Figure 1

Survival curves for UTGC patients with different tumor size.

Figure 3

Survival curves for UTGC patients with different N stages.

Table 2

Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in patients with UTGC.

Survival curves for UTGC patients with different tumor size. Survival curves for UTGC patients with different T stages. Survival curves for UTGC patients with different N stages. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis, 2 independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. As presented in Figure 4, tumor invasion depth (area under curve [AUC], 0.637; 95% CI, 0.531–0.743; P = .017) or lymph node metastasis alone (AUC, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.589–0.788; P = .001) showed significantly effective prognosis for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC.
Figure 4

ROC curves for UTGC patients with different T and N stages.

ROC curves for UTGC patients with different T and N stages.

Clinicopathologic comparison in UTGC patients with or without lymph node metastasis

As showed in Table 3, no differences in UTGC patients with or without lymph node metastasis were found in terms of sex, ages, macroscopic types, histological type, tumor growth types, lym embolism, and venous infiltration. However, univariate analysis of clinical factors affecting the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis revealed that tumor size (P = .023), lym embolism (P = .003), tumor invasion depth (P = .002), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .004) were risk factors for the 5-year OS (Table 4). Five-year OS for tumor size of ≤5 and > 5 cm were 57.2% and 32.7% respectively. Five-year OS for the absence and presence of lym embolism were 56.4% and 23.9%, respectively. Five-year OS for T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 83.3%, 53.6%, 34.6%, and 25.9%, respectively. Five-year OS for the absence and presence of invasion of tunica serosa were 56.5% and 34.7%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of all these risk factors showed that tumor size (RR, 1.587; 95% CI, 1.005–2.506; P = .048), lym embolism (RR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.046–2.721; P = .032), tumor invasion depth (RR, 1.421; 95% CI, 1.118–1.806; P = .004) and invasion of tunica serosa (RR, 1.619; 95% CI, 1.044–2.509; P = .031) were identified as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis (Table 5).
Table 3

Demographic and pathological comparison in UTGC patients with or without lymph node metastasis.

Table 4

Univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis.

Table 5

Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis.

Demographic and pathological comparison in UTGC patients with or without lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis.

Clinicopathologic comparison in UTGC patients with or without distant metastasis

The results showed that no differences in UTGC patients with or without distant metastasis were found in terms of sex, ages, tumor size, macroscopic types, histological type, tumor growth types, lym embolism, and venous infiltration (Table 6). However, univariate analysis of clinical factors affecting the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with distant metastasis revealed that tumor invasion depth (P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) were risk factors for the 5-year OS (Table 7). Five-year OS for T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 89.5%, 68.3%, 25.6%, and 15.0%, respectively. 5-year OS for N0, N1, N2, and N3 were 90.8%, 69.5%, 46.7%, and 50.5%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of these two risk factors showed that tumor invasion depth (RR, 1.536; 95% CI, 1.403–1.682; P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (RR, 1.811; 95% CI, 1.592–2.059; P < .001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with distant metastasis (Table 8).
Table 6

Demographic and pathological comparison in UTGC patients with or without distant metastasis.

Table 7

Univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with distant metastasis.

Table 8

Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with distant metastasis.

Demographic and pathological comparison in UTGC patients with or without distant metastasis. Univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with distant metastasis.

Clinicopathologic comparison in UTGC patients with or without tumor recurrence

As showed in Table 9, no differences in UTGC patients with or without tumor recurrence were found in terms of sex, ages, tumor size, macroscopic types, histological type, tumor growth types, lym embolism, and venous infiltration. However, univariate analysis of clinical factors affecting the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with tumor recurrence demonstrated that tumor invasion depth (P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (P = .002) were risk factors for the 5-year OS (Table 10). Five-year OS for T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 75.0%, 68.1%, 65.9%, and 57.9%, respectively. Five-year OS for N0, N1, N2 and N3 were 84.4%, 57.7%, 23.6%, and 50.0%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of these 2 risk factors showed that tumor invasion depth (RR, 1.308; 95% CI, 1.135–1.688; P = .001) and lymph node metastasis (RR, 1.282; 95% CI, 1.361–1.631; P = .004) were identified as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with tumor recurrence (Table 11).
Table 9

Demographic and pathological comparison in UTGC patients with or without local recurrence.

Table 10

Univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with local recurrence.

Table 11

Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with local recurrence.

Demographic and pathological comparison in UTGC patients with or without local recurrence. Univariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with local recurrence. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting 5-year OS in UTGC patients with local recurrence.

Discussion

The present study has some limitations. First, this was a retrospective study with a small sample size at a single institution. Second, no comparison of UTGC with middle or lower GC was performed, which need further investigation in the future. Third, effect of operative approaches on outcome remains to be examined. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical and pathological findings of 126 UTGC patients undergoing the radical surgical treatment in Qinghai Province of the Northwest China during a period of 5 years. We found that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for UTGC patients were 81.1%, 47.6%, and 38.6% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor invasion depth and/or lymph node metastasis are the independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and tumor recurrence of UTGC. The epidemiology of gastric cancer remains largely unknown. Helicobacter pylori has been reported to chronically infect the stomach of more than 50% of the human population, representing the major cause of gastric cancer.[ UTGC is biologically aggressive and typically are diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. As a result, they are difficult to treat, and patient prognosis is poor.[ The OS rate of UTGC varies in different population.[ Li et al[ found that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 367 UTGC patients were 76.0%, 28.9%, and 13.6%, which are much lower than that of 81.1%, 47.6%, and 38.6% accordingly in the present study. The reason might be explained by the facts that the percentages of stages of both (T3 + T4)/(T1 + T2 + T3 + T4) and (N2 + N3)/(N0 + N1 + N2 + N3) in the previous study by Li et al[ are much higher than that of our finding (93.2% vs 40.5% for T stage and 47.9% vs 16.7% for N stage). These differences in survival rate, T stage and N stage suggested that the deeper of tumor invasion and the more lymph node metastasis, the less survival rate of UTGC. In addition, studies have been shown that the depth of gastric wall infiltration, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis have been recognized as the important independent prognostic indicators,[ among which pT and pN are most significant.[ Some scholars [ think that lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor. Kunisaki et al[ reported the prognostic factors for 191 early UTGC patients following the surgical treatment and found that esophageal invasion, macroscopic appearance, tumor diameter, histological type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion all significantly affected prognosis, whereas sex, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy did not as assessed by univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis both independently influenced prognosis.[ Inconsistently, the present study showed that only tumor size, tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis were the risk factors for 5-year OS as evaluated by univariate analysis. These inconsistences might be attributed to the early UTGC in the previous study and relatively more advanced UTGC in our study. Consistently, our study also identified tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC as assessed by multivariate analysis. ROC curve analysis also revealed that tumor invasion depth or lymph node metastasis alone showed significantly effective prognosis for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important factors that affect postoperative OS of UTGC.[ The lymph node metastasis rate in this study is 57.9%. It is well known that the prognosis of non lymph node metastases is better than that of those without metastasis.[ The surgical effect and prognosis of gastric cancer are closely related to the lymph node metastasis with 3 folds of the 5-year OS with or without lymph node metastasis.[ Consistently, the present study revealed that the 5-year OS with or without lymph node metastasis were 21.7% and 61.9% respectively. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size, lym embolism, tumor invasion depth, and invasion of tunica serosa as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis. The present study also showed that 5-year OS in UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis for T1, T2, T3, and T4 were 83.3%, 53.6%, 34.6%, and 25.9% respectively, suggesting that with the increase in T stage, the 5-year OS decreases accordingly. Local recurrence and distant metastasis are the other most important factors that affect postoperative OS of UTGC.[ In spite of the significant effect of enlarged lymph node dissection and joint viscera resection for gastric cancer, the overall effect is still unsatisfactory. More than half of the patients relapse after radical gastrectomy, which is the main cause of death after radical gastrectomy. It has been reported that the recurrence rate of gastric cancer after radical resection is as high as 50.0% to 70.0%[. Macdonald et al[ reported that in patients with lymph node metastases in the resected specimen, the relapse and death rates from recurrent cancer are at least 70% to 80%. Yoo et al[ evaluated the long-term results of a proximal gastrectomy of 63 UTGC patients to analyze the risk factors of local recurrence affecting survival in these patients. The authors found that during a median follow-up period of 37 months, 25 of the 63 patients (39.7%) developed a recurrence of cancer, with local recurrence in 15 patients (23.8%), the majority of these occurring at the remnant stomach or anastomosis. Univariate analysis of risk factors for local recurrence revealed an infiltrative or diffuse gross type, with a tumor sizes > 5 cm, a distal resection margin < or = 3 cm and serosal invasion. In the present study, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis were identified as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in UTGC patients with local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Conclusion

The present study has suggested that for UPGC patients undergoing the radical surgical treatment, tumor invasion depth and/or lymph node metastasis are the independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and tumor recurrence. The results are of clinically useful for the early diagnosis and treatment of UTGC.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Xiaoming Ma, Wei Zhou. Formal analysis: Xiaoming Ma, Cheng Wang, Wei Miao. Investigation: Xiaoming Ma, Wei Zhou, Cheng Wang, Ning Liu. Methodology: Shigui Wang, ShiHao Guan. Supervision: Xiaoming Ma. Writing – original draft: Wei Zhou. Writing – review & editing: Xiaoming Ma.
  28 in total

1.  Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Takashi Ichikura; Toshiya Ogawa; Kentaro Chochi; Toshinobu Kawabata; Hidekazu Sugasawa; Hidetaka Mochizuki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Determining prognostic factors for gastric cancer using the regression tree method.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Yamamura; Toshifusa Nakajima; Keiichiro Ohta; Atsushi Nashimoto; Kuniyoshi Arai; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Mitsuru Sasako; Yasuhiro Kodera; Masashi Goto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 codon 118 polymorphism, micro ribonucleic acid and protein expression, clinical outcome of the advanced gastric cancer response to first-line FOLFOX-4 in Qinghai-Tibetan plateau population.

Authors:  Yu-Juan Qi; Sen Cui; Ying-Zhong Yang; Jing-Qi Han; Bao-Jia Cai; Cun-Fang Sheng; Yan Ma; Tana Wuren; Ri-Li Ge
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.805

4.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-25

6.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of carcinoma of the gastric cardia.

Authors:  Dong Yi Kim; Jae Kyoon Joo; Seong Yeob Ryu; Young Kyu Park; Young Jin Kim; Shin Kon Kim
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 8.  Treatment of localized gastric cancer.

Authors:  John S Macdonald
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Surgical outcomes of patients with gastric carcinoma: the importance of primary tumor location and microvessel invasion.

Authors:  Mark S Talamonti; Simon P Kim; Katherine A Yao; Jeffrey D Wayne; Joseph Feinglass; Charles L Bennett; Sambasiva Rao
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Clinicopathological Features of Upper Third Gastric Cancer during a 21-Year Period (Single Center Analysis).

Authors:  Je-Ho Jang; Reinaldo Isaacs Beron; Hye Seong Ahn; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo-Ho Kim; Kuhn Uk Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  2 in total

1.  High expression of survivin predicts poor prognosis in cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin.

Authors:  Yunzhong Zhang; Hong Yan; Ruiping Li; Yuzhen Guo; Rongfang Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Comparison of clinicopathologic profiles and prognosis of gastric cancer in the upper, middle and lower third of the stomach: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaoming Ma; Chengwu Zhang; Cheng Wang; Wei Miao; Wei Zhou; Juan An; Wenjie Qiao; Mingzheng Li; Minggui Lai; Pengjie Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.