Literature DB >> 14605635

Surgical outcomes of patients with gastric carcinoma: the importance of primary tumor location and microvessel invasion.

Mark S Talamonti1, Simon P Kim, Katherine A Yao, Jeffrey D Wayne, Joseph Feinglass, Charles L Bennett, Sambasiva Rao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was done to identify clinicopathologic predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients undergoing potentially curative resections for gastric carcinoma.
METHODS: We reviewed 110 patients surgically treated between 1987 and 2001. There were 74 men and 36 women with a mean age of 65.2 years (range 27 to 87 years). Log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to determine clinicopathologic factors influencing DFS and OS. Significant factors were then determined with Cox multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Median survival for all patients was 38.2 months and the estimated 5-year OS was 42.3%. There were no significant differences in DFS or OS for female sex, black race, or age>65. Symptoms associated with lower DFS were weight loss and palpable abdominal mass (P<.05), although none were predictive for OS. Median survival was markedly worse in patients undergoing esophagogastrectomy versus gastrectomy (26.8 vs 52.3 months; P<.05), although there were no significant differences between patients undergoing total gastrectomy versus subtotal gastrectomy. As expected, OS was inversely proportional to the American Joint Committee on Cancer's tumor stage. When compared with patients with partial-thickness tumors (T(1-2)), full-thickness (T(3-4)) tumors had a decreased median survival (63.8 vs 27.9 months; P<.01). Although N(2) stage was associated with decreased survival (20.6 months), patient outcomes were similar for N(0) and N(1) stages (52.5 and 48.8 months). Lymphatic and capillary invasion (21.4 vs 45.3 months; P<.02) and proximal location of primary tumors (28.5 vs 58.6 months; P<.02) were the only other factors adversely affecting survival. Lauren classification and histologic grade were not significant predictors of patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, microvessel involvement and tumor location are important predictors of DFS and OS in gastric cancer and should be included in risk stratification and selection criteria for patients entering novel adjuvant or neoadjuvant clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605635     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00337-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  35 in total

1.  Predicting individual survival after gastric cancer resection: validation of a U.S.-derived nomogram at a single high-volume center in Europe.

Authors:  Alexander R Novotny; Christoph Schuhmacher; Raymonde Busch; Michael W Kattan; Murray F Brennan; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Lymphovascular invasion is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer: an application of gene-expression and tissue array techniques.

Authors:  Bryan J Dicken; Kathryn Graham; Stewart M Hamilton; Sam Andrews; Raymond Lai; Jennifer Listgarten; Gian S Jhangri; L Duncan Saunders; Sambasivarao Damaraju; Carol Cass
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  DO PROXIMAL AND DISTAL GASTRIC TUMOURS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?

Authors:  Laurence Bedin da Costa; Marcelo Garcia Toneto; Luis Fernando Moreira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

4.  Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniele Marrelli; Alfonso De Stefano; Giovanni de Manzoni; Paolo Morgagni; Alberto Di Leo; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics in patients with AFP-secreting gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Yakup Bozkaya; Nebi Serkan Demirci; Alican Kurtipek; Gökmen Umut Erdem; Nuriye Yildirim Ozdemir; Nurullah Zengin
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-08

6.  Survival after gastric adenocarcinoma resection: eighteen-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Steven C Cunningham; Farin Kamangar; Min P Kim; Sommer Hammoud; Raqeeb Haque; Anirban Maitra; Elizabeth Montgomery; Richard E Heitmiller; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Can lymphovascular invasion be predicted by preoperative multiphasic dynamic CT in patients with advanced gastric cancer?

Authors:  Zelan Ma; Changhong Liang; Yanqi Huang; Lan He; Cuishan Liang; Xin Chen; Xiaomei Huang; Yabing Xiong; Zaiyi Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Zini; B Cavallo Marincola; D Geiger; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Sentinel node mapping during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  E Orsenigo; V Tomajer; S Di Palo; L Albarello; C Doglioni; E Masci; E Viale; C Staudacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Fatih Selcukbiricik; Evin Buyukunal; Deniz Tural; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Fuat Demirelli; Suheyla Serdengecti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.