JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatology: Implications for Paediatric Syndromes?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the recent increase in the profile and use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) in adult patients with rheumatic diseases, we aimed to review the current evidence accruing for use in paediatric rheumatology patients. RECENT
FINDINGS: Significant advances have been made in the management of rheumatic diseases in the past two decades. The introduction of biologic agents in both adults and children has provided significant improvements to patient outcomes and led to better quality of life. Moreover, responses to similar agents allude to common effector pathways operating across juvenile and adult synovitis especially. However, inefficacy and intolerance of these agents leads to a subset of children with limited treatment options. Since 2012, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKinibs), a novel group of oral small molecule inhibitors, have demonstrated their efficacy in several forms of adult inflammatory arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). There are hopes that these successes will be transferable to the paediatric population. In the following review, we discuss the development and progress of JAKinibs in this regard.

Introduction

The treatment of paediatric rheumatic diseases has evolved markedly over the past two decades. The development of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has provided a significant armamentarium to rheumatologists, improving clinical outcomes for patients. Unfortunately, a subset of patients either remain unresponsive to these agents, experience partial or loss of efficacy, or have adverse events during treatment necessitating discontinuation. Hence, there is an unmet need for such refractory patients. JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) are small molecule inhibitors of the Janus Kinase family of receptors. JAK-mediated pathways are known to be implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as well as several other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) [1, 2]. Crucially, these small molecule inhibitors provide a novel mechanism of action in treating these conditions by affecting intracellular signalling pathways. Substantial evidence for the use of JAKinibs has been demonstrated in multiple successful clinical trials in adults with RA and PsA. [3-5].

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common paediatric rheumatic disease and is associated with significant morbidity [6]. Treatment of polyarticular and systemic JIA entails the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) [7]. Lately, bDMARDs targeting cytokines implicated in pro-inflammatory pathways, such as interleukin-1 and -6 (IL-1 and IL-6), and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), amongst others, have markedly advanced the treatment of otherwise recalcitrant disease. JAKinibs have now been approved for use in adults with RA and PsA, and phase 3 studies are underway to establish the role and efficacy of these molecules in the treatment of JIA. There is also interest into whether they may provide therapeutic potential in a group of autoinflammatory conditions of the innate immune system termed ‘type 1 interferonopathies’. We discuss below the current knowledge base and progress in establishing the role for JAKinibs within paediatric rheumatology.

JAK Structure and Signalling

There are four known JAKs (JAK 1, 2, 3 and TYK2), which are members of the tyrosine kinase (TYK) family of protein kinases [8]. Every JAK is composed of 4 structural domains, within which there exist seven homologous regions (JH1-7). JH1 (kinase domain) is the primary catalytic phosphotransferase, whereby ATP is bound, both autophosphorylating the JAK complex and phosphorylating signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) [9]. JAKinibs effect their function via competitive inhibition of the ATP binding site on JH1 [8]. Notably, JAK family proteins exhibit a high degree of structural homology, the most pronounced of which is seen in the JH1 subunit. There is furthermore significant homology between JAKs and other tyrosine kinases [8]. Difficulties have therefore arisen in developing a selective kinase inhibitor, with cross-JAK side-effects being present amongst especially first generation JAKinibs (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Specific Janus Kinases associate with different receptors [8]. Janus kinases (JAKs) consist of four subtypes: JAK1, 2, 3 and TYK2. Different receptors signal exclusively via specific JAK subtypes. Receptor subunits have varying affinity for these separate JAKs. First generation JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have a side effect profile influenced by their cross-JAK effects, e.g. haematological sequelae due to blockade of JAK2. EPO: erythropoietin; G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GH: growth hormone; GM-CSF: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL: interleukin; TPO: thrombopoietin; TYK: tyrosine kinase

JAK-STAT signalling is implicated in several cytokine pathways: type I/II cytokines bind to their receptors and activate JAKs, which phosphorylate STATs initiating downstream signalling cascades. Each cytokine receptor is composed of several intracellular subunits; each subunit in turn associates with a JAK. Hence, varying JAK subtypes become paired when associated with distinct receptors, for example common gamma chain (γc) receptor associates with JAK3 and JAK1 (Fig. 1) [10]. Receptor subunits have varying degrees of specificity: some associate exclusively with specific JAKs; others possess less specificity. This has potential implications for drug development, treatment considerations and side-effect profiles.

Disease Entities—Clinical and Molecular Aspects

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a terminology used for a broad range of immune-mediated articular disorders affecting children less than 16 years of age. Six phenotypic forms of JIA are recognised [6], which are subtyped based on clinical features, genetics, serology and systemic involvement. Notably, approximately 20% of children fail to meet criteria for any of the specific subtypes and are termed ‘undifferentiated’ [6]. The common responses elicited to biologic therapeutic interventions between adult and juvenile disease point to shared pathogenetic pathways, especially in the context of inflammatory synovitis. For example, RhF positive polyarticular JIA closely resembles adult RA in its disease manifestations and natural disease trajectory, though data elucidating similarities at a molecular level in synovium are limited. A study examining genotypic risk loci was performed by Prahalad et al in 155 children with RhF positive JIA and 684 healthy controls [11•]. They established an increased risk in children with variants in genes encoding PTPN22, STAT4 and TNFAIP3 in a similar magnitude and direction as previously observed in adults with RA. Additionally, they demonstrated significant association between this subtype of JIA and HLA-DRB1 alleles previously outlined as conferring increased risk in RA patients. On the other hand, gene expression profiles from PBMCs obtained from children with various subtypes of JIA have shown divergence between sJIA and polyarticular disease [12]. sJIA and its adult form, adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), share common pathophysiological mechanisms: they have been shown to associate with raised serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, and IL-18 [13, 14]. Interestingly, in both sJIA and AOSD, increased serum levels of IL-18 have been observed to correlate with disease activity and with the risk of developing the potentially life-threatening macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a complication notable for its haemophagocytic activity [13, 15].

Taken together, it is reasonable to assume that there will be benefit of therapeutics established in adult inflammatory arthritis in the wider juvenile inflammatory syndromes.

Interferonopathies

Type I interferons are fundamental to innate immunity. Toll-like receptors 3, 7 and 9 (TLR3, 7 and 9) are pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed on macrophages, dendritic cells and B cells [16] and in turn drive IFN expression and thereby downstream consequences of IFN effector biology [17]. Transcriptional activation of relevant loci and increased expression of IFN is governed by distinct pathways downstream of DNA and RNA sensors (Fig. 2). RNA sensors include retinoic acid-inducible-I (RIG-I)-like helicases, RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), which signal via mitochondrial antiviral signalling (MAVS) adaptor protein [17], stimulating signalling pathways involved in activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and interferon-regulatory factors (IRFs) IRF3 and IRF7, which lead to transcription and subsequent production of IFN-α, along with other pro-inflammatory cytokines [17]. DNA sensing is chiefly performed by cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), which, following single stranded DNA (ssDNA) or double stranded DNA (dsDNA) binding, in turn enzymatically produces cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) [19]. cGAMP thereafter signals through stimulator of interferon genes (STING), similarly activating IRF3 and producing type 1 IFN. Upon release of IFN from the cell, an autocrine and paracrine loop is established, whereby type 1 IFNs (IFN-α and IFN-β) bind to the interferon-α receptor (IFNAR), associated intracellularly with a heterodimer of JAK1 and TYK2. Consequent STAT1/2 recruitment and phosphorylation triggers increased transcription of IFNB and ISGs [19]. These defence mechanisms confer antiviral properties to the infected cell and surrounding milieu. This heightened pro-inflammatory state disturbs routine cell functions, such as metabolism, and prompts recruitment and activation of adaptive effector cells (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Type 1 Interferon signalling and production [18••]. The innate immune system has developed sensing mechanisms against nucleic acid components as a defence against viral infections. Sensing of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) is controlled by separate signalling pathways with the common final result of increased production of type 1 interferon (IFN). An autocrine feedback loop occurs via the IFN-α receptor (IFNAR), further contributing to upregulation of IFN secretion. Mutations in genes regulating key sensing mechanisms, such as TREX1, SAMHD1 and STING, can produce aberrantly high type 1 IFN levels, a defining characteristic of interferonopathies. cGAMP: cyclic GMP-AMP; cGAS: cyclic GMP-AMP synthase; IRF: interferon-regulatory factor; JAK: janus kinase; IFN: interferon; MAVS: mitochondrial anti-viral signalling; MDA5: melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5; RIG-I: retinoic acid-inducible-I; STING: stimulator of interferon genes

It is well established that recurrent inflammatory features presenting in juvenile patients at an early age may represent primary genetic disorders of innate inflammatory pathways, such as Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), or cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS). Type 1 interferonopathies represent a heterogeneous group of disorders, both genetically and phenotypically, with abnormalities in discrete stages of nucleic acid metabolism or in cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensors, concluding in a final common pathway marked by aberrant overproduction of type 1 IFNs [20]. A broad range of clinical manifestations can occur in these patients, largely characterised by onset of autoinflammatory and autoimmune features early in life (Table 1). These disorders are unified by detection in peripheral blood of a marked elevation in type 1 interferon gene signature (IGS). (Table 1)

Table 1

Type 1 Interferonopathies. Mutated gene, pattern of inheritance and manifestations. Adapted from Table 1 in Volpi S, Picco P, Caorsi R, Candotti F, Gattorno M. Type I interferonopathies in pediatric rheumatology. Pediatric Rheumatology. Pediatric Rheumatology; 2017 Sep 1;:1–12, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Disease	Gene	Inheritance	Manifestations
Aicardi-Goutière Syndrome (AGS) 1 [21, 22•]	TREX-1	AR and AD	Progressive encephalopathy, basal ganglia calcifications, lymphocytosis, raised IFN-α in CSF (Classical AGS)
AGS2 [22•]	RNASEH2B	AR	Clinical features of AGS
AGS3 [22•]	RNASEH2C		Clinical features of AGS
AGS4 [22•]	RNASEH2A		AGS with dysmorphic features
AGS5 [22•]	SAMHD1	AR	Mild AGS, mouth ulcers, deforming arthropathy, cerebral vasculopathy with early onset stroke
AGS6 [22•]	ADAR	AR and AD	Classical AGS, bilateral striatal necrosis
AGS7 [22•]	IFIH1	AD	Classical or mild AGS, though may be asymptomatic
Retinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukodystrophy (RVCL) [23]	TREX-1	AD	Retinopathy and cerebrovascular disease, leukodystrophy, dementia, migraines, glomerulopathy
Spondyloenchondrodysplasia (SPENCD) [24]	ACP5	AR	Spondyloenchondrodysplasia, possible combined immunodeficiency, arthritis, thrombocytopenia, short stature
STING associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) [25]	TMEM173	AD	Cutaneous vasculopathy especially acral involvement, interstitial lung disease, fever, arthralgia
USP18 deficiency [26]	USP18	AR	Cerebral calcification and haemorrhage, hepatomegaly, thrombocytopenia
ISG15 deficiency [18••]	ISG15	AR	Increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infections, basal ganglia calcification, seizures
Singleton-Merten Syndrome (SMS) [27, 28]	IFIH1, DDX58	AD	Cardiovascular sequelae, aortic calcification, dental and skeletal abnormalities, psoriasiform cutaneous lesions
Chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE) [29]	PSMA3, PSMB4, PSMB8, PSMB9, POMP	AD	Panniculitis, lipodystrophy, joint contractures, basal ganglia calcification, fever, arthritis, myositis, dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome, aseptic lymphocytic meningitis
Trichohepatoenteric syndrome (THES) [30]	SKIV2L	AR	Intractable diarrhoea, woolly hair, intrauterine foetal growth restriction, facial dysmorphism and short stature, immunodeficiency
X-linked reticulate pigmentary disorder (XLPDR)[31]	POLA1	XR	Hyperpigmented skin lesions; GI disease including gastroenteritis, colitis; failure to thrive
DNase II deficiency [32]	DNASE2	AR	Cytopenias, hepatosplenomegaly, fever, non-erosive deforming arthropathy, cutaneous vasculitic lesions, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis
Familial chilblain lupus [33]	TREX1, SAMHD1, TMEM173	AD	Chilblain lesions, arthralgia, lymphopenia

ADAR1 adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1, ACP5 acid phosphastase 5, tartrate resistant, AGS Aicardi-Goutière syndrome, AD autosomal dominant, AR autosomal recessive, CANDLE chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DDX58 DEAD box protein 58, IFIH1 IFN-induced helicase C domain-containing protein 1, ISG15 interferon-stimulated gene 15, POLA1 DNA polymerase alpha 1, PSMA proteosome subunit alpha type, PSMB proteosome subunit beta type, RNASEH2 ribonuclease H2, RVCL Retinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukodystrophy, SAMHD1 deoxynucleoside triphosphohydrolase SAM domain and HD domain 1, SPENCD spondyloenchondrodysplasia, SAVI STING associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy, PRAAS proteosome-associated autoinflammatory syndrome, SMS Singleton-Merten Syndrome, THES Trichohepatoenteric syndrome, TMEM173 Transmembrane protein 173, TREX1 DNA 3’ – repair exonuclease 1, USP18 ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18, XLPDR X-linked reticulate pigmentary disorder, XR X-linked recessive

Pharmacological management of these conditions has proven to be challenging. Patients are currently treated with high doses of glucocorticoids orally or intravenous, and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered. Patients may struggle to wean glucocorticoids due to recurrence of symptoms. A variety of steroid-sparing agents have been employed with limited or no clinical success, including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine, as well as biologic agents antagonising IL-1, TNF or IL-6 [18••, 25, 34]. It has been considered that agents targeting specific components of the IFN signalling pathways may provide more positive clinical results. Given the criticality of the JAK/STAT pathway in the promulgation of the signal from the IFNAR, JAKs provide high biological plausibility as efficacious targets in these relatively treatment resistant conditions. Our current accumulated experience of use of specific JAKinibs in this patient cohort is discussed in more detail below.

Tofacitinib

Tofacitinib is a first-generation JAKinib and was the first JAKinib designed to specifically treat IMIDs [10]. This compound inhibits JAK1 and JAK3 primarily; JAK2 activity is inhibited to a lesser extent; and TYK2 activity is negligible [8]. Notably, metabolism of tofacitinib is primarily hepatic via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system [9]. (Table 2)

Table 2

Enzyme assay values for half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for current JAKinibs

Enzyme assay IC50 (nM)
Compound	JAK1	JAK2	JAK3	TYK2
Tofacitinib [8]	15.1	77.4	55.0	489
Baricitinib [8]	4.0	6.6	787.0	61.0
Ruxolitinib [8]	6.4	8.8	487.0	30.1
Filgotinib [35]	363	2400	> 10,000	2600
Peficitinib [36]	3.9	5.0	0.71	4.8

Tofacitinib at 5 and 10mg orally twice daily has been investigated extensively in adults in a series of clinical trials, including six phase III trials involving more than 6000 patients with RA [36, 37]. Efficacy in reducing disease activity, as measured by American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, and 70% response criteria (ACR 20, 50, 70), has been demonstrated in DMARD-naïve, csDMARD inadequate responders (csDMARD-IR), and bDMARD-IR cohorts. To date, only two RCTs have assessed tofacitinib in PsA, and have similarly illustrated benefit in patients with inadequate response to csDMARDs and bDMARDs (discussed below).

In the ORAL Start study, tofacitinib has shown superiority to methotrexate (MTX) in clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in DMARD-naïve patients [38]. Non-inferiority to adalimumab, a TNFα-inhibitor, has been demonstrated in RA patients who are inadequate responders to MTX. ORAL Standard and Strategy present supportive data that tofacitinib in combination with MTX performs as well as adalimumab in combination with MTX in achieving ACR20 and ACR50 responses at 6 months [3, 4, 39]. Additional data from these trials highlighted that clinically significant improvements in disease activity measures were achieved earlier than with conventional biological agents, and that responses were sustained over a 12-month period. Patients who were inadequate responders to bDMARDs demonstrated significant improvements in ACR20 and HAQ versus placebo. Based on these data, tofacitinib has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and the UK-based National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for the treatment of moderate to severe RA.

Tofacitinib has also shown efficacy in adult patients with PsA. OPAL Broaden demonstrated superiority of tofacitinib doses of 5mg or 10mg compared to placebo in csDMARD-IR patients, with significant improvements in ACR20 and HAQ-DI scores at 3 months [40]. OPAL Beyond provided evidence of clinical benefit from tofacitinib in patients with inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF bDMARDs. ACR20 and HAQ-DI values improved significantly compared to placebo at 3 months [41].

Data relating to the use of tofacitinib in JIA are more limited. Preliminary studies have sought to establish the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of tofacitinib in the JIA population. A phase 1, open-label, multicentre study by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Organisation (PRINTO) and the Paediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) enrolled twenty-six patients aged 2–17 years [42]. All patients had polyarticular JIA, with rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis variant being most common (84.6% of all patients in the study). Study participants entered one of three cohorts, based on age: cohort 1, aged 12 to < 18 years; cohort 2, aged 6 to < 12 years; cohort 3, aged 2 to < 6 years. Median doses of tofacitinib were 5.0 mg BID, 2.5 mg BID, and 3.0 mg BID respectively, based on body weight. The unexpected increase in median dose of drug in cohort 3 resulted from an interim PK analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 and consequent amendment to dosing scheme to cohort 3. Accordingly, geometric mean AUC at steady state (AUCtau) in cohort 2 (118.8 ng h/ml) was lower than cohort 1 (156.6 ng h/ml), while cohort 3 showed a higher AUCtau value (142.5 ng h/ml). Cmax (ng/ml) was 47.0, 41.7, and 66.2 in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Ctrough, Cmin and t1/2 were comparable in cohorts 2 and 3, but higher in cohort 1. Tofacitinib was well tolerated and had no serious adverse events (SAEs) or discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). A grape-flavoured solution was used in younger patients and those with lower weight, and this formulation was acceptable.

Further to these PK data, efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 1-5mg BID is being determined in a currently-recruiting Phase 3, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study of polyarticular JIA patients (A3921104; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02592434). A long-term, open-label phase 2/3 extension study is ongoing for those JIA patients who have previously enrolled in qualifying/index studies of tofacitinib, including the phase 1 study detailed above (A3921165; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01500551). In addition to use within the polyarticular JIA cohort, a randomised withdrawal double-blind placebo-controlled study is currently recruiting to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib in patients with sJIA (A3921165; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03000439).

Tofacitinib has been reported to provide benefit in case reports of individuals with interferonopathies. König et al describe a family of Greek descent with five members affected by familial chilblain lupus aged between 12 and 86 years [43, 44]. Original age of onset of symptoms was between 2 months and 12 years of age. Symptoms included cold-induced digital vasculopathy of the fingers, toes, nose, cheeks and ears or with indurated violaceous patches on the thighs. Necrotic ulceration occurred in some cases. No haematological abnormalities were detected, but low titre ANAs were found in 4 out of 5 patients, and one had a high titre of anti-C1q antibodies. Whole exome sequencing identified a novel heterozygous mutation in STING (c.497G>A; p.Gly166Glu, p.G166E). Two of these family members were treated with oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily for 17 days. At day 14, ISG in peripheral blood was found to have significantly reduced and patients reported a reduction in digital discomfort.

Separately, a team of Korean clinicians report the use of tofacitinib in a 9-year-old boy with SAVI [45]. From 6–12 months of age, the child exhibited increased infection frequency and features of vasculopathy (skin telangiectasia). At age 5, he suffered an unprovoked cerebral infarction. At age 8, he developed interstitial lung disease (computed tomography evidence of obliterative bronchiolitis) requiring supplemental oxygen therapy, and further cerebral infarction accompanied by subarachnoid haemorrhages. Whole-exome sequencing revealed 2 de novo variants in TMEM173. Primary cultured fibroblasts taken from the affected patient exhibited significantly raised IFN-β mRNA levels before and after stimulation with cGAMP. Treatment with oral tofacitinib 5mg BID led to improvement in telangiectatic skin lesions, but not of the patient’s respiratory function, possibly due to established damage caused by inflammatory insult.

Baricitinib

Baricitinib is a first-generation selective JAK 1 and 2 inhibitor, which has similarly proven efficacy in RA in a variety of clinical scenarios. Baricitinib at doses of 2 mg and 4 mg once daily by oral preparation have undergone evaluation in multiple phase III studies, demonstrating safety and efficacy in achieving clinically meaning improvements in disease activity, radiographic measures and patient-reported outcomes [46, 47]. In the RA-BEACON study, baricitinib exhibited efficacy in bDMARD-IR patients [35, 48]. Interestingly, baricitinib has also been shown to possess superiority to adalimumab in a cohort of MTX-IR patients, achieving a new landmark in drug development for RA. Such data have led to the approval of baricitinib for RA in more than 40 countries, including by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and NICE; however, concerns regarding the increased risk of venous thromboembolism led the FDA to reject the approval of baricitinib at that time, instead requesting further clinical safety data. A resubmission has been considered by the FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee, who have recommended only the lower 2mg once daily dosing.

There exist no data on baricitinib use in JIA, and there are no clinical trials at present evaluating its use in this context. Instead, a current open-label compassionate use study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01724580) is employing baricitinib for treatment of autoinflammatory diseases, including interferonopathies. Sanchez et al report on 18 patients treated with baricitinib within this program [49]. Ten patients had genetically confirmed CANDLE syndrome, four with genetically confirmed SAVI, and four with other IFNopathies. Mean age at enrolment was 12.5 with 78% of patients having been on glucocorticoid (GC) therapy for an average 5.7 years (range 1–17 years) prior to enrolment. All patients had been inadequate responders to previous csDMARDs and bDMARDs. Mean duration of treatment was 3.0 years (1.5–4.9), and median daily symptom scores improved significantly from 1.3 to 0.25 (p < 0.0001). Fourteen patients were receiving GC at baseline; of this cohort, daily GC doses decreased from 0.44 to 0.11 mg/day (p < 0.001). Five of 10 (50%) CANDLE patients interestingly achieved sustained clinical remission. In this sub-group of patients, with the most marked clinical response, the 25-gene IFN score normalised completely. The four SAVI patients still experienced flares of vasculitis, though reduced in frequency and intensity, and no patients suffered further digital amputation during treatment. No SAVI patients achieved normalisation of the 25-gene IFN score. Three patients discontinued drug, two with genetically undefined disease due to primary inefficacy, and a CANDLE patient due to infectious complication (BK viraemia). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were frequent, with 83% of patients experiencing at least one SAE. In most cases, these resolved without treatment interruption. Infectious sequelae were consistent with established data in adults: upper respiratory tract infections were most common, and herpes zoster was observed in two patients. Notably, transient cytopenias was observed to accompany infections. BK viraemia was detected in one patient leading to acute renal injury and treatment discontinuation. This has not been observed in adult rheumatology patients, though has been observed in trials evaluating the use of tofacitinib in preventing renal transplant rejection [50]. Hence, high clinical suspicion should be exercised in patients with new or worsening renal dysfunction upon commencement of JAKinib therapy.

Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib is a selective oral JAK 1/2 inhibitor with proven efficacy reduce symptoms and splenomegaly in adult myelofibrosis. Frémond et al describe 3 children with SAVI treated with ruxolitinib [51]. The patients were aged 5 to 12 years and had genetically proven SAVI: gain-of-function TMEM173 mutations in the context of clinical features consistent with SAVI (vasculopathy, interstitial pulmonary disease, systemic inflammation). Treatment with ruxolitinib led to favourable results in patient-reported well-being, reduction in febrile episodes and in skin lesions, along with improvement in lung function. Similar to the baricitinib study described above, incomplete IFN IGS normalisation was observed in these patients. The authors report no increase in incidence of infection in any of the 3 children.

Adverse effects associated with JAKinib use

Immune modulation via JAK/STAT signalling carries with it side effects commensurate with blocking this pathway. Tofacitinib has been the most widely used and studied agent, but accumulating data on the other agents suggest similar profiles.

As with other immunosuppressive agents, it can be expected that JAKinibs carry an increased risk of infection. The large RCTs in adult RA patients reported infections commonly as adverse events (AEs) [52]. The most frequent sites of infection were upper respiratory tract, urinary, and viral gastroenteritis. The majority of infections did not necessitate treatment discontinuation. More severe and opportunistic infections were observed, such as tuberculosis (TB), fungal and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [data indicate that the overall infective risk does not seem to be significantly increased compared to established biologic agents [53, 54]]. One notable difference to other biologics is the increased risk of varicella zoster infection (VZV). There exist hypotheses about the mechanism behind this, such as effects on NK cell function or IFN production, but these have not yet been fully elucidated. In Asian populations, chemokine functional polymorphisms have also been implicated. BK viraemia has also been detailed above.

Given the effects of JAKinibs on IL-6 signalling, lipid profile abnormalities are similarly to be expected, as is seen commonly with the IL-6-receptor (IL-6R) antagonist tocilizumab. RA patients have an increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality when compared with age and sex matched healthy controls, despite active RA being associated with reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol [55]. There exist some data to suggest that tofacitinib treatment reduces cholesterol ester catabolism, hence increasing cholesterol levels towards those of healthy controls [56]. Reassuringly, clinical trials and long-term extension data have not borne out an increased risk of cardiovascular disease with any of the JAKinib family.

JAK2 mediates signalling of cytokines involved in haematological cellular proliferation and survival, such as erythropoietin and G-CSF; hence, patients are at risk of developing cytopenias, including anaemia and leukopenia. Reassuringly, trial data suggest that these usually did not require treatment discontinuation. The development of newer generation JAKinibs seeks to mitigate this potentially undesirable effect. Other potential adverse effects reported in trials include transient reductions in renal function, mild increases in serum transaminases [57], and increased risk of gastrointestinal perforation similar to tocilizumab [54].

Conclusion

Over the last two decades, improved treatments for rheumatic diseases have offered great promise to patients and their families. Patients with rheumatic diseases within the adult population have benefited from several large successful phase III trials supporting the introduction of multiple biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. The scale of research in this field in relation to the paediatric population is significantly more limited. The advent of oral JAKinib therapies heralds a potentially exciting era in paediatric rheumatology—their role in JIA is especially anticipated for broader clinical practice, whilst rarer conditions will presumably also benefit.