| Literature DB >> 30406843 |
Lu-Min Vaario1,2, Shambhu Prasad Sah3, Mariko Norisada4, Maki Narimatsu5, Norihisa Matsushita6.
Abstract
Tricholoma matsutake is an ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungus capable of in vitro saprotrophic growth, but the sources of C and N used to generate sporocarps in vivo are not well understood. We examined natural abundance isotope data to investigate this phenomenon. For this purpose, C, N and their stable isotopes (13C, 15N) content of fungal sporocarps and their potential nutrient sources (i.e., foliage, litter, fine roots, wood, and soil) were investigated from two well-studied sites in Finland and Japan. Our results show that δ13C values of T. matsutake and other fungal groups are consistent with those of most studies, but a very high δ15N value (16.8‰ ± 2.3) is observed in T. matsutake. Such isotopic pattern of fungal δ15N suggests that matsutake has a greater proteolytic potential to digest chemically complex 15N-enriched organic matter and hydrophobic hyphae. This assumption is further supported by a significant and positive correlation between δ13Ccap-stipe and δ15Ncap-stipe exclusively in T. matsutake, which suggests common C and N sources (protein) possible for isotopically enriched cap. The 13C increase of caps relative to stipe presumably reflects greater contents of 13C-enriched protein than 13C-depleted chitin. We conclude that T. matsutake is a typical ECM fungus which obtains for its sporocarp development for both C and N from a common protein source (vs. photosynthetic carbon) present in soil organic matter.Entities:
Keywords: Ectomycorrhizal fungi; Source; Sporocarps; Stable isotope; Tricholoma matsutake
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30406843 PMCID: PMC6311186 DOI: 10.1007/s00572-018-0870-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycorrhiza ISSN: 0940-6360 Impact factor: 3.387
Fig. 1Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope values for different forest components and sporocarps of the study sites. Data points represent means with standard deviation. TM, Tricholoma matsutake; OECM, other ECM fungi; SAP, saprotrophic fungi; MS, mineral soil; FR, fine root; OS, organic soil; WO, wood; LI, litter; FO, foliage
Mean values of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope values and %C and %N of different forest compartments in this study
| Sample type | Sample number | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | C% | N% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foliage (FO) | 7 | − 30.02 (1.38)d | − 5.42 (0.89)d | 47.74 (3.65)ab | 1.15 (0.40)a |
| Litter (LI) | 13 | − 29.06 (1.21)cd | − 3.73 (0.69)cd | 51.32 (2.61)a | 0.60 (0.12)b |
| Wood (WO) | 7 | − 26.48 (0.59)a | − 2.79 (0.58)c | 46.30 (3.61)ab | 0.09 (0.16)c |
| Organic soil (OS) | 9 |
| − 2.62 (1.49)c | 43.39 (9.99)ab | 1.34 (0.47)a |
| Fine root (FR) | 7 | − 27.94 (0.92)abc | 1.05 (1.98)b | 42.03 (8.80)b | 1.03 (0.15)a |
| Mineral soil (MS) | 8 | − 27.43 (0.88)ab | 3.90 (1.27)a | 3.77 (1.65)c | 0.12 (0.04)c |
*The mean values (± SD) within forest compartments (source pools) were compared using a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test; the same letter indicates no significant different, α = 0.05
Fig. 2Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope values for all sporocarps in species level. TrSp, Tricholoma sp.; TrU, T. ustela; TM, T. matsutake; SuV, Suillus variegatus; SuB, S. bovinus; SaS, Sarcodon scabrosus; RuSp, Russula sp.; RuV, R. vinosa; RuR, R. rhodopoda; RuC, R. claroflava; RuA, R. amethystine; RhB, Rhodocollybia butyracea; PhN, Phellodon niger; MySp, Mycena sp.: LyS, Lyophyllum semitale; LeS, Leccinum scabrum; LeH, L. holopus; LaSp, Lactarius sp.; HySp, Hygrophoropsis sp.; HyR, Hydnum repandum; EnSp, Entoloma sp.; CoSp, Cortinarius sp.; CoT, C. turgidus; CoF, C. fulvescens; CaL, Cantharellus luteocomus; BoE, Boletus edulis; ArO, Armillaria ostoyae; ArB, A. borealis; AmM, Amanita muscaria; AmF, A. fulva. Means ± SD
The difference in cap vs. stipes for carbon and nitrogen stable isotope values
| Sporocarps | Sample number | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | C% | N% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap | Stipe | Cap–stipe** | Cap | Stipe | Cap–stipe | Cap | Stipe | Cap–stipe | Cap | Stipe | Cap–stipe | ||
| OECM | 38 | − 25.68* | − 26.26 | 0.55b | 5.26* | 2.51 | 2.73 | 41.90 | 41.00 | 0.77 | 4.33* | 2.73 | 1.37 |
| 1.07 | 1.10 | 0.87 | 4.55 | 4.17 | 2.33 | 2.30 | 2.48 | 2.49 | 1.51 | 1.11 | 0.25 | ||
| TM | 15 | − 25.02* | − 26.34 | 1.25a | 18.31* | 15.15 | 3.08 | 40.38* | 38.88 | 1.80 | 3.93* | 2.03 | 1.82 |
| 1.09 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 2.66 | 1.97 | 1.63 | 2.88 | 3.59 | 5.23 | 1.39 | 1.01 | 1.23 | ||
| SAP | 9 | − 23.58 | − 24.44 | 0.98 ab | 0.71 | − 1.45 | 3.21 | 40.64 | 40.57 | − 0.10 | 5.93* | 3.80 | 1.73 |
| 0.79 | 1.14 | 0.80 | 2.98 | 2.27 | 2.46 | 3.82 | 1.23 | 4.75 | 1.36 | 1.25 | 0.76 | ||
*The statistical difference of mean values (SD in every second row) between cap and stipe is marked with asterisks with examined by student t test, α = 0.05
**The mean values (SD in every second row) of cap–stipe within three fungal groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test; the same letter indicates no significant different, α = 0.05