Literature DB >> 30406585

Effects of different composting strategies on methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide emissions and nutrient loss during small-scale anaerobic composting.

Bo Yang1,2, Yuchun Ma2,3, Zhengqin Xiong4.   

Abstract

Composting is considered as one of the main sustainable methods for the treatment of livestock manure. In this study we investigated the effects of additives (urea and rice straw) on methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions using a traditional Chinese pig slurry composting method over an 81-day period, as well as examining total organic carbon and total nitrogen loss. Four common treatment strategies were examined in this study: a control (MC), urea nitrogen addition (MN), composting using rice straw cover (MScover), and compost mixed with rice straw (MSmix). Our results indicate that the addition of urea resulted in the lowest total CH4 emissions and the highest N2O emissions. MScover treatment had the highest and most significant effect on CH4 emissions, while MSmix treatment had the lowest CO2 emissions. Carbon lost through CH4 and CO2 released during the experiment was 0.1-0.9 and 2.4-3.9% of total carbon loss, respectively, and nitrogen lost through N2O release was 11.1-17.9% of total nitrogen. In general, although MSmix, MScover, and MN treatments increased global warming potential by 21.4, 41.6, and 50.9% per kg of pig slurry, respectively, no statistical differences between the four treatments were recorded. By considering carbon and nitrogen conservation, as well as the improvement of the quality of compost and the mitigation of greenhouse gases (GHGs), the small-scale composting method of pig slurry alone is an acceptable environmentally friendly strategy for use in China.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobic; GHGs; Global warming potential; Nutrient loss; Pig slurry; Small-scale composting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30406585     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3646-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  43 in total

Review 1.  The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions--a review.

Authors:  X F Lou; J Nair
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  GHG emissions during the high-rate production of compost using standard and advanced aeration strategies.

Authors:  B Puyuelo; T Gea; A Sánchez
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Comparison of biochar, zeolite and their mixture amendment for aiding organic matter transformation and nitrogen conservation during pig manure composting.

Authors:  Quan Wang; Mukesh Kumar Awasthi; Xiuna Ren; Junchao Zhao; Ronghua Li; Zhen Wang; Hongyu Chen; Meijing Wang; Zengqiang Zhang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Greenhouse gas emissions from liquid dairy manure: Prediction and mitigation.

Authors:  Søren O Petersen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Mass balances and life cycle inventory of home composting of organic waste.

Authors:  J K Andersen; A Boldrin; T H Christensen; C Scheutz
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 7.145

6.  Combined use of nitrification inhibitor and struvite crystallization to reduce the NH3 and N2O emissions during composting.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Xuguang Ma; Qiong Tang; Juan Yang; Guoxue Li; Frank Schuchardt
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Reduced turning frequency and delayed poultry manure addition reduces N loss from sugarcane compost.

Authors:  S Bryndum; R Muschler; A Nigussie; J Magid; A de Neergaard
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 7.145

8.  Effect of fertilising with pig slurry and chicken manure on GHG emissions from Mediterranean paddies.

Authors:  S C Maris; M R Teira-Esmatges; A D Bosch-Serra; B Moreno-García; M M Català
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems.

Authors:  Thomas H Christensen; Emmanuel Gentil; Alessio Boldrin; Anna W Larsen; Bo P Weidema; Michael Hauschild
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2009-05-07

10.  Patterns and quantities of NH(3), N(2)O and CH(4) emissions during swine manure composting without forced aeration--effect of compost pile scale.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Fukumoto; Takashi Osada; Dai Hanajima; Kiyonori Haga
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.642

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.