Literature DB >> 29224872

Greenhouse gas emissions from liquid dairy manure: Prediction and mitigation.

Søren O Petersen1.   

Abstract

The handling and use of manure on livestock farms contributes to emissions of the greenhouse gases (GHG) CH4 and N2O, especially with liquid manure management. Dairy farms are diverse with respect to manure management, with practices ranging from daily spreading to long-term storage for more efficient recycling of manure nutrients for crop production. Opportunities for GHG mitigation will depend on the baseline situation with respect to handling and storage, and therefore prediction and mitigation at the farm level requires a dynamic description of housing systems and storage conditions, and use of treatment technologies. Also, effects of treatment and handling on the properties of field-applied manure must be taken into account. Storage conditions and manure composition importantly define carbon and nitrogen transformations, and the resulting emissions of CH4 and N2O, as well as CO2 and NH3, which are all important for the GHG balance. Currently, inventories for CH4 and N2O emissions from manure are based on emission factors for a limited number of production systems, together with average annual temperature, but the inherent uncertainty of this approach is a barrier toward prediction and mitigation. Although more representative emission factors may be determined at country level, this is both challenging and costly, and effects of management changes for GHG mitigation are not easily quantified. An empirical model of CH4 emissions during storage is discussed that is based on daily time steps, and a parameterization based on measurements. A distinction between emissions from manure in barns and outside storage facilities is important for assessing effects of treatment technologies, such as anaerobic digestion, where only posttreatment emissions are affected. Upon field application, manure and soil together define the equilibrium distribution of labile carbon and nitrogen between bulk soil and manure hotspots. This introduces heterogeneity with respect to potential for N2O emissions, which is not represented in existing prediction models. Manure treatment and management options for GHG mitigation are discussed with emphasis on effects on manure volatile solids and N availability. Anaerobic digestion and acidification represent treatment technologies that are relevant for GHG mitigation on dairy farms.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  manure management; methane; nitrous oxide; volatile solids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224872     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Effects of different composting strategies on methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide emissions and nutrient loss during small-scale anaerobic composting.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Yuchun Ma; Zhengqin Xiong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  From hogs to HABs: impacts of industrial farming in the US on nitrogen and phosphorus and greenhouse gas pollution.

Authors:  Patricia M Glibert
Journal:  Biogeochemistry       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.825

3.  Manure management strategies are interconnected with complexity across U.S. dairy farms.

Authors:  Meredith T Niles; Serge Wiltshire; Jason Lombard; Matthew Branan; Matthew Vuolo; Rajesh Chintala; Juan Tricarico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Reduction in Methane Emissions From Acidified Dairy Slurry Is Related to Inhibition of Methanosarcina Species.

Authors:  Jemaneh Habtewold; Robert Gordon; Vera Sokolov; Andrew VanderZaag; Claudia Wagner-Riddle; Kari Dunfield
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Potential application of urease and nitrification inhibitors to mitigate emissions from the livestock sector: a review.

Authors:  Eska Nugrahaeningtyas; Dong-Jun Lee; Jun-Ik Song; Jung-Kon Kim; Kyu-Hyun Park
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.