Literature DB >> 30404788

Screening for a new primary cancer in patients with existing metastatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Matthew C Cheung1, Jill Tinmouth2, Peter C Austin2, Hadas D Fischer2, Kinwah Fung2, Simron Singh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening aims to detect malignant disease early in its natural history when interventions might improve patient outcomes. Such benefits are unclear when screening occurs for patients with an existing high risk of death. Our aim was to study the extent of routine cancer screening for a new primary cancer in patients with existing metastatic cancer.
METHODS: We used administrative databases from Ontario to identify a retrospective cohort of adults of eligible screening age (≥ 50 yr) who had a diagnosis of stage IV (metastatic) colorectal, lung, breast or prostate cancer between 2007 and 2012. We calculated the cumulative incidence of cancer screening over time for colorectal and breast cancer.
RESULTS: Among the 20 992 patients with metastatic lung, breast or prostate cancer, 2.9%, 6.3% and 13.3% of patients, respectively, underwent testing for colorectal cancer within 1 year of cancer diagnosis. Within 3 years of diagnosis, rates reached 4.1%, 12.3% and 27.5%, respectively (8.5% of all patients). Incidence of colorectal cancer testing was higher among patients who received their diagnoses more recently compared with patients with diagnoses from earlier time periods (p = 0.0143). Among the 10 034 women with metastatic lung or colorectal cancer, 8.7% and 8.0% of patients, respectively, underwent breast cancer screening within 1 year of cancer diagnosis. Within 3 years of diagnosis, screening rates reached 10.2% and 13.1%, respectively.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate excessive rates of cancer screening among patients with metastatic cancer who are unlikely to benefit. Further studies are warranted to identify predictors for screening, resource implications, potential and real harms borne by patients, and the impact of a recent Choosing Wisely statement recommending against the practice. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30404788      PMCID: PMC6231993          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  13 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Michel Joffres; James Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Gabriela Lewin; Richard Birtwhistle; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Nicole Hodgson; Donna Ciliska; Mary Gauld; Yan Yun Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: Choosing Wisely Canada.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Tai Huynh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990/91 to 2000.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Erika Halapy; Victoria Nadalin; Rene Shumak; Frances O'Malley; Verna Mai
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; T To; C J Baines; C Wall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Validation of international algorithms to identify adults with inflammatory bowel disease in health administrative data from Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Eric I Benchimol; Astrid Guttmann; David R Mack; Geoffrey C Nguyen; John K Marshall; James C Gregor; Jenna Wong; Alan J Forster; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Emily T Vella; Nancy N Baxter; Catherine Dubé; Michael Gould; Amanda Hey; Nofisat Ismaila; Bronwen R McCurdy; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-14

10.  A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  E J A Morris; L E Whitehouse; T Farrell; C Nickerson; J D Thomas; P Quirke; M D Rutter; C Rees; P J Finan; J R Wilkinson; J Patnick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correction: Screening for a new primary cancer in patients with existing metastatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study Correction.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 2.  A scoping review characterizing "Choosing Wisely®" recommendations for breast cancer management.

Authors:  Hely Shah; Julian Surujballi; Arif Ali Awan; Brian Hutton; Angel Arnaout; Risa Shorr; Lisa Vandermeer; Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.872

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.