Literature DB >> 16374227

Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990/91 to 2000.

Anna M Chiarelli1, Erika Halapy, Victoria Nadalin, Rene Shumak, Frances O'Malley, Verna Mai.   

Abstract

Performance measures for the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) by age group, time period and screening modality from 10 years of breast screening were evaluated. Data were available from routine information collected on 283,962 women aged 50 to 69 screened at 73 screening centres between 1 July 1990 and 31 December 2000. Although, initially, participation in the OBSP was low, this rate increased over time and the majority of women screened returned for subsequent screening. Abnormal call rates increased slightly over the time period, were higher in women aged 50 to 59, and for women with mammographic abnormalities. Detection rates of invasive cancer were higher and prognostic features of cancers were better for women age 60 to 69, and those referred by mammography. Along with the prognostic features of cancers, the benign to malignant surgical ratio and diagnostic interval improved over the time periods and for women aged 60 to 69. Greater proportions of women had shorter diagnostic intervals and were more likely to have a diagnosis of breast cancer after surgery if they were referred by both clinical breast examination and mammography. Although some enhancements of the programme are necessary, the OBSP met or exceeded Canadian targets for most performance measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16374227     DOI: 10.1097/01.cej.0000195713.02567.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  15 in total

1.  Using organizational network analysis to plan cancer screening programs for vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; Bobbi J Carothers; Aisha K Lofters
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Screening for a new primary cancer in patients with existing metastatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Matthew C Cheung; Jill Tinmouth; Peter C Austin; Hadas D Fischer; Kinwah Fung; Simron Singh
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-11-07

3.  Insurance-Based Differences in Time to Diagnostic Follow-up after Positive Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Danielle D Durham; Whitney R Robinson; Sheila S Lee; Stephanie B Wheeler; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; J Michael Bowling; Andrew F Olshan; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Periodic screening for breast and cervical cancer in women with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Dominika Bhatia; Rinku Sutradhar; Peter C Austin; Vasily Giannakeas; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Lawrence F Paszat; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Impact of familial risk and mammography screening on prognostic indicators of breast disease among women from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Kristine Cooper; Mitra Nabavi; Gord Glendon; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Improving work-up of the abnormal mammogram through organized assessment: results from the ontario breast screening program.

Authors:  May Lynn Quan; Rene S Shumak; Vicky Majpruz; Claire M D Holloway; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Using concept mapping in the knowledge-to-action process to compare stakeholder opinions on barriers to use of cancer screening among South Asians.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; Andrew D Pinto; Aisha Lofters
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Trends in laboratory testing for diabetes in Ontario, Canada 1995-2005: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sarah E Wilson; Lorraine L Lipscombe; Laura C Rosella; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Accuracy of Self-Reported Screening Mammography Use: Examining Recall among Female Relatives from the Ontario Site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Anna M Chiarelli; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.