Literature DB >> 30404721

Disparities in the allocation of research funding to gynecologic cancers by Funding to Lethality scores.

Ryan J Spencer1, Laurel W Rice2, Clara Ye3, Kaitlin Woo4, Shitanshu Uppal5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze National Cancer Institute (NCI) funding distributions to gynecologic cancers compared to other cancers from 2007 to 2014.
METHODS: The NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER), Cancer Trends Progress Report, and Funding Statistics were used to analyze 18 cancer sites. Site-specific mortality to incidence ratios (MIR) were normalized per 100 cases and multiplied by person-years of life lost to derive cancer-specific lethality. NCI funding was divided by its lethality to calculate Funding to Lethality scores for gynecologic malignancies and compared to 15 other cancer sites.
RESULTS: Ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancers ranked 10th (score 0.097, SD 0.008), 12th (0.087, SD 0.009), and 14th (0.057, SD 0.006) for average Funding to Lethality scores. The highest average score was for prostate cancer (score 1.182, SD 0.364). In U.S. dollars per 100 incident cases, prostate cancer received an average of $1,821,000 per person-years of life lost, while ovarian cancer received $97,000, cervical cancer $87,000, and uterine cancer $57,000. Ovarian and cervical cancers had lower average Funding to Lethality scores compared to nine other cancers, while uterine cancer was lower than 13 other cancers (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Analyses of eight-, five-, and three-year trends for gynecologic cancers showed nearly universal decreasing Funding to Lethality scores.
CONCLUSION: Funding to Lethality scores for gynecologic cancers are significantly lower than other cancer sites, indicating a disparity in funding allocation that persists over the most recent eight years of available data. Prompt correction is required to ensure critical discoveries for women with gynecologic cancers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Resource allocation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30404721      PMCID: PMC6519051          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Beyond Obesity: The Rising Incidence and Mortality Rates of Uterine Corpus Cancer.

Authors:  Megan A Mullins; Michele L Cote
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Perspectives From Advancing National Institutes of Health Research to Inform and Improve the Health of Women: A Conference Summary.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Samia Noursi; Judith G Regensteiner; Pamela Stratton; Janine A Clayton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 3.  Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review.

Authors:  S M Temkin; E Chapman-Davis; N Nair; D E Cohn; J F Hines; E C Kohn; S V Blank
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Gender Disparity in the Funding of Diseases by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Authors:  Arthur A Mirin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Research Conducted in Women Was Deemed More Impactful but Less Publishable than the Same Research Conducted in Men.

Authors:  Sohad Murrar; Paula A Johnson; You-Geon Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Cohort Study in the Total Population of Croatian Patients.

Authors:  Dora Čerina; Višnja Matković; Kristina Katić; Ingrid Belac Lovasić; Robert Šeparović; Ivana Canjko; Blanka Jakšić; Branka Petrić-Miše; Žarko Bajić; Marijo Boban; Eduard Vrdoljak
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.