Matthew Farrow1,2, Christof Lutteroth3,2, Peter C Rouse1, James L J Bilzon1,2. 1. a Department for Health , University of Bath , Bath , UK. 2. c Centre for the Analysis of Motion, Entertainment Research and Applications (CAMERA) , University of Bath , Bath , UK. 3. b Department of Computer Science , University of Bath , Bath , UK.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if: (i) mean power output and enjoyment of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) are enhanced by virtual-reality (VR)-exergaming (track mode) compared to standard ergometry (blank mode), (ii) if mean power output of HIIT can be increased by allowing participants to race against their own performance (ghost mode) or by increasing the resistance (hard mode), without compromising exercise enjoyment. Methods:Sixteen participants (8 males, 8 females, VO2max: 41.2 ± 10.8 ml-1·kg-1·min-1) completed four VR-HIIT conditions in a partially-randomised cross-over study; (1a) blank, (1b) track, (2a) ghost, and (2b) hard. VR-HIIT sessions consisted of eight 60 s high-intensity intervals at a resistance equivalent to 70% (77% for hard) maximum power output (PMAX), interspersed by 60 s recovery intervals at 12.5% PMAX, at a self-selected cadence. Expired gases were collected and VO2 measured continuously. Post-exercise questionnaires were administered to identify differences in indices related to intrinsic motivation, subjective vitality, and future exercise intentions. Results:Enjoyment was higher for track vs. blank (difference: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.3) with no other differences between conditions. There was no difference in mean power output for track vs. blank, however it was higher for track vs. ghost (difference: 5 Watts; CI: 3, 7), and hard vs. ghost (difference: 19 Watts; 95% CI: 15, 23). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that VR-exergaming is an effective intervention to increase enjoyment during a single bout of HIIT in untrained individuals. The presence of a ghost may be an effective method to increase exercise intensity of VR-HIIT.
RCT Entities:
Purpose: To determine if: (i) mean power output and enjoyment of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) are enhanced by virtual-reality (VR)-exergaming (track mode) compared to standard ergometry (blank mode), (ii) if mean power output of HIIT can be increased by allowing participants to race against their own performance (ghost mode) or by increasing the resistance (hard mode), without compromising exercise enjoyment. Methods: Sixteen participants (8 males, 8 females, VO2max: 41.2 ± 10.8 ml-1·kg-1·min-1) completed four VR-HIIT conditions in a partially-randomised cross-over study; (1a) blank, (1b) track, (2a) ghost, and (2b) hard. VR-HIIT sessions consisted of eight 60 s high-intensity intervals at a resistance equivalent to 70% (77% for hard) maximum power output (PMAX), interspersed by 60 s recovery intervals at 12.5% PMAX, at a self-selected cadence. Expired gases were collected and VO2 measured continuously. Post-exercise questionnaires were administered to identify differences in indices related to intrinsic motivation, subjective vitality, and future exercise intentions. Results: Enjoyment was higher for track vs. blank (difference: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.3) with no other differences between conditions. There was no difference in mean power output for track vs. blank, however it was higher for track vs. ghost (difference: 5 Watts; CI: 3, 7), and hard vs. ghost (difference: 19 Watts; 95% CI: 15, 23). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that VR-exergaming is an effective intervention to increase enjoyment during a single bout of HIIT in untrained individuals. The presence of a ghost may be an effective method to increase exercise intensity of VR-HIIT.
Authors: Dana Badau; Adela Badau; Carmen Ene-Voiculescu; Alin Larion; Virgil Ene-Voiculescu; Ion Mihaila; Julien Leonard Fleancu; Virgil Tudor; Corina Tifrea; Adrian Sebastian Cotovanu; Alexandru Abramiuc Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jacek Polechoński; Katarzyna Nierwińska; Barbara Kalita; Piotr Wodarski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sascha Ketelhut; Reinhard G Ketelhut; Eva Kircher; Lisa Röglin; Kuno Hottenrott; Anna Lisa Martin-Niedecken; Kerstin Ketelhut Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-01-27
Authors: Trenton H Stewart; Kirsten Villaneuva; Amanda Hahn; Julissa Ortiz-Delatorre; Chandler Wolf; Randy Nguyen; Nicole D Bolter; Marialice Kern; James R Bagley Journal: Front Rehabil Sci Date: 2022-08-08
Authors: Théo Perrin; Charles Faure; Kévin Nay; Giammaria Cattozzo; Anthony Sorel; Richard Kulpa; Hugo A Kerhervé Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390