Literature DB >> 30403658

Correlation of Expression Levels of Micro Ribonucleic Ccid-10b (miR-10b) and Micro Ribonucleic Acid-181b (miR-181b) with Gastric Cancer and Its Diagnostic Significance.

Ying Gao1, Zhicai Xu2, Fei Yuan3, Minglei Li3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to explore the expression levels of micro ribonucleic acid-10b (miR-10b) and micro ribonucleic acid-181b (miR-181b) in gastric cancer tissues, as well as their application value in clinical diagnosis and treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 120 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed and treated in the Department of Gastroenterology of our hospital were enrolled in this study. The gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues were collected for measuring the expression of miR-10b and miR-181b by in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The 5-year survival rate was also analyzed. RESULTS The expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues were both upregulated and were significantly higher than those in the paracancerous tissues (p<0.05). In addition, the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues were correlated with tumor size, degree of pathological differentiation, depth of infiltration, tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, and lymph node metastasis, as well as local lymph node and distant metastasis (p<0.05). For patients in stage II and III, the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b were significantly correlated with the 5-year survival rate. CONCLUSIONS The high expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b are significantly correlated with poor prognosis in stage II and III patients with gastric cancer, suggesting that their expressions might be criteria for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30403658      PMCID: PMC6234754          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Gastric cancer, the second most common malignant tumor that endangers human health, has an increasing incidence rate in recent years. More than 40% of the world’s gastric cancer cases occur in China [1]. Nearly 80% of the gastric cancer cases are already in the terminal stage at the time of first diagnosis, and surgical resection is widely used for these patients. However, the prognosis is poor, with the 5-year survival rate being less than 10% [2]. The occurrence and development of gastric cancer are complicated and involve multiple factors. With a length of 19–25 nt, the micro ribonucleic acids (microRNAs, miRNAs) are endogenous, single-stranded, non-coding, and small RNA molecules with a high degree of conservation and can inhibit the translation of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) by combining with the untranslated region of the target gene [3]. Evidence shows that miRNAs are abnormally expressed in gastric cancer tissues [4]. A previous study showed [5] that the abnormal expressions of miRNAs are involved in the pathological processes of the occurrence and development of gastric cancer, such as abnormal proliferation, infiltration, and metastasis of gastric cancer cells. MicroRNA-10B (miR-10b) is located in the homeobox (HOX) gene cluster, and the HOX family is a special type of transcriptional regulator. miR-10b can play a unique regulatory role in proliferation and differentiation of normal cells as well as in the occurrence, development, infiltration, and metastasis of tumor cells [6,7]. Studies have shown that microRNA-181b (miR-181b) can inhibit the expression of tumor-suppressing genes in tissue cells and increase the activity of nuclear factor-kappa B (κB), ultimately resulting in the malignant transformation of tissue cells, indicating a regulatory role of miR-181b in the occurrence and development of tumor cells [8]. However, the association of miR-10b or miR-181b with gastric cancer remains poorly understood. In the present study, we assessed the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues and their effect on the 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients, aiming to provide a reference for the prognosis of gastric cancer.

Material and Methods

General materials

A total of 120 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed and treated in the Department of Gastroenterology of our hospital were recruited in this study. There were 64 males and 56 females, aged from 30 to 82 years old with an average age of (58.2±27.4) years old. Gastric cancer tissues (n=120) and paracancerous tissues (n=120) were extracted for analysis of the expression levels of miR-10b and miR-181b. None of the patients were treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy before the operation. Classification was performed by tumor diameters: 70 cases were less than 5 cm in diameter and 50 cases were greater than or equal to 5 cm. Classification by degrees of differentiation showed that 4 cases were well-differentiated, 35 cases were moderately differentiated, and 81 cases were poorly differentiated. Classification by depth of infiltration showed 16 cases of T1, 30 cases of T2, 67 cases of T3, and 7 cases of T4. Lymph node metastasis showed 74 cases with metastasis and 46 cases without metastasis. Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging showed 25 cases in stage I, 29 in stage II, 48 in stage III, and 18 in stage IV. All patients and their families signed the informed consent and this study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee.

Experimental consumables

Tissue RNA extraction kit (Shanghai So-Fe Biomedical Co., Ltd.), real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction kit (Shanghai Kang Lang Biological Technology Co., Ltd.), primer (Shanghai Yanqi Biological Technology Co., Ltd.), hermle (Shanghai Lingcheng Biological Technology Co., Ltd.), PCR instrument [Application Binary Interface (ABI)], ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Hangzhou Noted Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.), real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR software (Life Technologies), and sensitivity-enhanced in situ hybridization kit (Boster Biological Technology).

Methods

In situ hybridization

The expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in the tissues were detected using an in situ hybridization kit according to the operation instructions. Digoxin-labeled miR-10b and miR-181b probes were provided by Exiqon. The proportion of positive tumor cells ≤5% was recorded as 0, 6~25% as 1, 26~50% as 2, and >50% as 3. Staining intensity: Non-stained was recorded as 0, canary yellow as 1, yellowish-brown as 2 and brown as 3. The product of scores of positive proportion and staining intensity was used as the judgment basis for the final evaluation. Product ≥4 was treated as high expression and <4 as low expression.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection

The reverse transcriptional complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) system included: 5 μL 5×RT-PCR buffer solution, 1 μL Reverse transcriptase (RTase) Mix, 1 μL 2.5 U/μL polymerase, 2 μg sample RNA, and 25 μL 3-diethylamino-1-propyne (DEP) water. Conditions of reverse transcription were 37°C for 60 min and 85°C for 5 min. In the end of the reaction, the products were diluted 5 times and stored at low temperature. The RT-PCR amplification system consisted of 10 μL 2×All-in-One quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) Mix, 2 μL All-in-One miRNA qPCR Primer, 2 μL Universal Adaptor PCR Primer, 2 μL cDNA (Dilute 5 times), and 4 μL DEP water. RT-PCR reaction conditions were 95°C for 10 min, 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 10 s, with 40 cycles.

MicroRNA calculation

The RT-PCR experiment was performed using U6 as the internal reference and 2-ΔCT method was used to calculate the relative expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues and adjacent tissues, among which ΔCT was the D-value between the CT target gene and CTU6.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The non-normally distributed data are represented by the median and normally-distributed data are expressed by mean ± standard deviation (SD). The t test or Wilcoxon test was performed for comparison between groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for independent samples comparison between groups. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

In situ hybridization analysis of the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b

The positive-expression cells of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric carcinoma were demonstrated to be stained in the cytoplasm under the light microscope, while the negative-expression cells were not stained (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b via in situ hybridization analysis. (A) Negative expression of miR-10b, (B) Negative expression of miR-181b, (C) Positive expression of miR-10b, (D) Positive expression of miR-181b.

Expressions of miR-10b in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues

The expressions of miR-10b in gastric cancer tissues in 109 patients were significantly higher than those in paracancerous tissues (p=0.017) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Expressions of miR-10b in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues.

Expressions of miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues

The expressions of miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues in 97 patients were higher than those in paracancerous tissues, with a significant difference (p=0.0002) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Expressions of miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues.

The associations of the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b with pathological parameters of gastric cancer

The expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues were significantly associated with the tumor size, pathological differentiation, depth of infiltration, TNM staging, and lymph node metastasis, as well as with local lymph node and distant metastasis of the patients (p<0.05). However, they were not associated with age, sex, ot the location of gastric cancer (p>0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

The correlations of the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b with pathological parameters of gastric cancer.

miR-10bt/χ2pmiR-181bt/χ2p
HighLowHighLow
Age (years old)58.04±11.9660.81±11.922.4190.26459.02±12.0461.37±12.472.5950.306
Sex0.0150.9270.0280.892
 Male37 (57.81)27 (42.19)35 (54.69)29 (45.31)
 Female32 (57.14)24 (42.86)34 (60.71)22 (39.29)
Location4.1750.1333.9840.142
 Near-end7 (46.67)8 (53.33)8 (53.33)7 (46.67)
 Mid-end27 (60.00)18 (40.00)25 (45.45)30 (54.55)
 Far-end35 (58.33)25 (41.67)36 (60.00)24 (40.00)
Tumor size20.0240.000124.0540.0001
 <5 cm47 (67.14)23 (32.86)49 (70.00)21 (30.00)
 ≥5 cm22 (44.00)28 (56.00)20 (40.00)30 (60.00)
Pathological differentiation11.0520.0129.3860.019
 Well differentiated3 (75.00)1 (25.00)3 (75.00)1 (25.00)
 Moderately differentiated16 (45.71)19 (54.29)15 (42.86)20 (57.14)
 Poorly differentiated50 (61.73)31 (38.27)51 (62.96)30 (37.04)
Depth of infiltration41.0370.000138.0480.0001
 T114 (87.50)2 (12.50)11 (68.75)5 (31.25)
 T217 (56.67)13 (43.33)19 (63.33)11 (36.67)
 T335 (52.24)32 (47.76)34 (50.75)33 (49.25)
 T43 (42.86)4 (57.14)5 (71.43)2 (28.57)
TNM staging89.0170.000177.0450.0001
 I22 (88.00)3 (12.00)15 (60.00)10 (40.00)
 II23 (79.31)6 (20.69)21 (72.41)8 (27.59)
 III19 (39.58)29 (60.42)25 (52.08)23 (47.92)
 IV5 (27.78)13 (72.22)8 (44.44)10 (55.56)
Lymph node metastasis57.2310.000168.5510.0001
 No37 (80.43)9 (19.57)39 (84.78)7 (15.22)
 Yes32 (43.24)42 (56.76)30 (40.54)44 (59.46)
Local lymphatic node66.0480.000152.3750.0001
 pN036 (78.26)10 (21.74)32 (69.57)14 (30.43)
 pN120 (54.05)17 (45.95)22 (59.46)15 (40.54)
 pN29 (33.33)18 (66.67)10 (37.04)17 (62.96)
 pN34 (40.00)6 (60.00)5 (50.00)5 (50.00)
Distant metastasis15.9260.000112.0490.0001
 No63 (61.17)40 (38.83)60 (58.25)43 (41.75)
 Yes6 (35.29)11 (64.71)9 (52.94)8 (47.06)

Prognostic analysis

In patients in stage I, II, and III, the 5-year survival rates for patients with low expression of miR-10b were significantly higher than those of patients with high expression (p<0.05) (Figure 4). However, in patients in stage IV, the 5-year survival rates of patients with high expression and low expression of miR-10b were not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Prognostic analyses of the expressions of miR-10b and the 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients.

In stage II and III, the 5-year survival rates of patients with low expression of miR-181b were significantly higher than those in patients with high expression (p<0.05) (Figure 5). Interestingly, in patients in stage I and IV, no statistically significant difference in the 5-year survival rates was found in patients with high expression and low expression of miR-181b (p>0.05) (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Prognostic analyses of the expressions of miR-181b and the 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients.

Discussion

At present, most cancers in humans are the results of a variety of factors, and gastric cancer is no exception. Several factors are involved in the occurrence and development of cancer, such as mutations of oncogene and proto-oncogenes, formation of DNA methylation, and abnormal expression of non-coding RNA [9-11]. miRNAs are a kind of small-molecule RNA and nearly 2000 such small-molecule RNAs have been reported. Studies have suggested that small-molecule RNAs regulate 40% of gene expressions in humans and abnormal expressions during pathological processes have extremely important effects on the development of disease and prognosis through regulating the expressions of other genes [12,13]. At present the prognosis of gastric cancer is poor and the 5-year survival rate is low. Therefore, it is urgent to find a marker that can predict the prognosis of gastric cancer. Previous studies [14,15] found that compared with serum or tissue proteins as the markers, miRNAs are more sensitive markers, which can improve the prognosis of patients. In this study, we showed that the expression of miR-10b in gastric cancer was increased significantly, suggesting that it may be involved in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer, which is consistent with a previous study [16]. In addition, the expressions of miR-181b and miR-200c have also been demonstrated to be upregulated in gastric cancer tissues [17], indicating that multiple miRNAs might be involved in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer. Several studies [18-20] found that miRNAs can effectively regulate the posttranscriptional expression of the gene through binding to the target gene via base pairing, and the effect of regulation is closely associated with the prognosis. The present study found that the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in gastric cancer tissues were significantly associated with tumor size, pathological differentiation, depth of infiltration, TNM staging, and lymph node metastasis, as well as with local lymph node and distant metastasis (p<0.05), while the expressions were not associated with age, sex, or the location of gastric cancer. We also showed that in stage II and III patients, the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b were significantly associated with the prognosis of the 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients. In stage I, the expression of miR-10b was correlated with the 5-year survival rate, while the expression of miR-181b was not correlated with the 5-year survival rate, suggesting that attention should be paid to the expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in patients in stage II and III, which may be used as potential prognostic indicators for gastric cancer.

Conclusions

High expressions of miR-10b and miR-181b in the tissues of patients with gastric cancer have significant associations with the poor prognoses of patients in stage I and II, and detection of their expressions can be used as potential criteria for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
  20 in total

1.  MicroRNA-181b targets cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 in gastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Qian Yang; Wei-Qing Kong; Tao Liu; Min Liu; Xin Li; Hua Tang
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.885

2.  Current Progress on Understanding MicroRNAs in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Erol Arslan; Fred Moy
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-01

3.  Differential microRNA expression in signet-ring cell carcinoma compared with tubular adenocarcinoma of human gastric cancer.

Authors:  F Q Li; B Xu; Y J Wu; Z L Yang; J J Qian
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Evaluation of Tumor-Derived Exosomal miRNA as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Xiance Jin; Yanfan Chen; Hanbin Chen; Shaoran Fei; Didi Chen; Xiaona Cai; Linger Liu; Baochai Lin; Huafang Su; Lihao Zhao; Meng Su; Huanle Pan; Lanxiao Shen; Deyao Xie; Congying Xie
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Plasma microRNAs as biomarkers of pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eric J Duell; Leila Lujan-Barroso; Núria Sala; Samantha Deitz McElyea; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjonneland; Anja Olsen; Elisabete Weiderpass; Lill-Tove Busund; Line Moi; David Muller; Paolo Vineis; Dagfinn Aune; Giuseppe Matullo; Alessio Naccarati; Salvatore Panico; Giovanna Tagliabue; Rosario Tumino; Domenico Palli; Rudolf Kaaks; Verena A Katzke; Heiner Boeing; H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Anastasia Kotanidou; Ruth C Travis; Nick Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Jose Ramon Quiros; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Miren Dorronsoro; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Gianluca Severi; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Vinciane Rebours; Paul Brennan; Marc Gunter; Ghislaine Scelo; Greg Cote; Stuart Sherman; Murray Korc
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  A comprehensive study of smoking-specific microRNA alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aswini R Krishnan; Hao Zheng; James G Kwok; Yuanhao Qu; Angela E Zou; Avinaash Korrapati; Pin Xue Li; Joseph A Califano; Melbourne F Hovell; Jessica Wang-Rodriguez; Weg M Ongkeko
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  CDX2 is involved in microRNA-associated inflammatory carcinogenesis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Motonobu Saito; Hirokazu Okayama; Katsuharu Saito; Jin Ando; Kensuke Kumamoto; Izumi Nakamura; Shinji Ohki; Yoshimasa Ishi; Seiichi Takenoshita
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Aberrant miR-181b-5p and miR-486-5p expression in serum and tissue of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Fei Tian; Yanting Shen; Zhenzhu Chen; Rui Li; Jiafeng Lu; Qinyu Ge
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  MiR-181b regulates cisplatin chemosensitivity and metastasis by targeting TGFβR1/Smad signaling pathway in NSCLC.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Wang; Xuesong Chen; Qingwei Meng; Hu Jing; Hailing Lu; Yanmei Yang; Li Cai; Yanbin Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  MicroRNA profiling implies new markers of chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Mao Ouyang; Yongxin Li; Sheng Ye; Jieyi Ma; Liming Lu; Weiming Lv; Guangqi Chang; Xiaoxi Li; Qing Li; Shenming Wang; Wenjian Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  LncSNHG1 Promoted CRC Proliferation through the miR-181b-5p/SMAD2 Axis.

Authors:  Qi Huang; Zhi Yang; Jin-Hai Tian; Pei-Dong You; Jia Wang; Rong Ma; Jingjing Yu; Xu Zhang; Jia Cao; Jie Cao; Li-Bin Wang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.375

2.  Comprehensive evaluation of microRNA-10b in digestive system cancers reveals prognostic implication and signaling pathways associated with tumor progression.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Xiaolei Dai; Haibo Chen; Shuwei Zhai; Qiliang Peng; Shang Cai; Yaqun Zhu; Jian Huan; Yuntian Shen
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  The emerging role of miR-10 family in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Yanfen Shi; Zuolong Liu; Ziyi Li; Wei Xu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.173

4.  The prognostic and diagnostic values of MicroRNA-10b in gastric cancer: A comprehensive study based on meta-analysis and TCGA database.

Authors:  Lina Mei; Zhouxiang Lu; Zhangguo Shen; Sumei Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Vitamin D modulation and microRNAs in gastric cancer: prognostic and therapeutic role.

Authors:  Elena Gallardo Martin; Antia Cousillas Castiñeiras
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.