Clare Harrop1, Desiree Jones1, Shuting Zheng2, Sallie W Nowell1, Brian A Boyd3, Noah Sasson4. 1. Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrboro, North Carolina. 2. School of Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Juniper Gardens Children's Project, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas. 4. School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas.
Abstract
Although reduced social attention and increased nonsocial attention have been reported in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the studies have relied on predominantly male samples and have been underpowered to examine sex differences. These processes may differ for females with ASD, who have been shown to be dissimilar to males in social motivation and nonsocial features, including circumscribed interests (CI). The goal of this study was to compare social and nonsocial visual attention between males and females with ASD on a validated eye-tracking paradigm. Eighty-five school-aged (6-10 years) males and females with and without ASD completed a paired preference task of face and object stimuli (half of which related to common CI). After covarying for chronological and mental age, the presence of concurrently presented CI images reduced prioritization and attention to faces for males more than females, replicating previous findings. ASD females maintained comparable attention patterns to typically developing females, suggesting that previous findings of reduced social attention and increased attention to CI-related objects in autism may be specific to males. These findings are also inconsistent with the "extreme male brain" theory of autism. The more normative orienting and attention to social stimuli for females with ASD may indicate distinct phenotypic characteristics relative to males and possibly serve as a protective effect. Autism Res 2018, 11: 1264-1275.
Although reduced social attention and increased nonsocial attention have been reported in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the studies have relied on predominantly male samples and have been underpowered to examine sex differences. These processes may differ for females with ASD, who have been shown to be dissimilar to males in social motivation and nonsocial features, including circumscribed interests (CI). The goal of this study was to compare social and nonsocial visual attention between males and females with ASD on a validated eye-tracking paradigm. Eighty-five school-aged (6-10 years) males and females with and without ASD completed a paired preference task of face and object stimuli (half of which related to common CI). After covarying for chronological and mental age, the presence of concurrently presented CI images reduced prioritization and attention to faces for males more than females, replicating previous findings. ASD females maintained comparable attention patterns to typically developing females, suggesting that previous findings of reduced social attention and increased attention to CI-related objects in autism may be specific to males. These findings are also inconsistent with the "extreme male brain" theory of autism. The more normative orienting and attention to social stimuli for females with ASD may indicate distinct phenotypic characteristics relative to males and possibly serve as a protective effect. Autism Res 2018, 11: 1264-1275.
Authors: Ruben C Gur; Lee Schroeder; Travis Turner; Claire McGrath; Robin M Chan; Bruce I Turetsky; David Alsop; Joseph Maldjian; Raquel E Gur Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Z Ambarchi; K A Boulton; R Thapa; E E Thomas; M M DeMayo; N J Sasson; I B Hickie; Adam J Guastella Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2022-08-04
Authors: Katherine E Lawrence; Leanna M Hernandez; Hilary C Bowman; Namita T Padgaonkar; Emily Fuster; Allison Jack; Elizabeth Aylward; Nadine Gaab; John D Van Horn; Raphael A Bernier; Daniel H Geschwind; James C McPartland; Charles A Nelson; Sara J Webb; Kevin A Pelphrey; Shulamite A Green; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mirella Dapretto Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Katherine E Lawrence; Leanna M Hernandez; Jeffrey Eilbott; Allison Jack; Elizabeth Aylward; Nadine Gaab; John D Van Horn; Raphael A Bernier; Daniel H Geschwind; James C McPartland; Charles A Nelson; Sara J Webb; Kevin A Pelphrey; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mirella Dapretto Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 6.222