Literature DB >> 30402669

Multi-objective Parameter Auto-tuning for Tissue Image Segmentation Workflows.

Luis F R Taveira1, Tahsin Kurc2,3, Alba C M A Melo1, Jun Kong4,5,6, Erich Bremer2, Joel H Saltz2, George Teodoro7,8.   

Abstract

We propose a software platform that integrates methods and tools for multi-objective parameter auto-tuning in tissue image segmentation workflows. The goal of our work is to provide an approach for improving the accuracy of nucleus/cell segmentation pipelines by tuning their input parameters. The shape, size, and texture features of nuclei in tissue are important biomarkers for disease prognosis, and accurate computation of these features depends on accurate delineation of boundaries of nuclei. Input parameters in many nucleus segmentation workflows affect segmentation accuracy and have to be tuned for optimal performance. This is a time-consuming and computationally expensive process; automating this step facilitates more robust image segmentation workflows and enables more efficient application of image analysis in large image datasets. Our software platform adjusts the parameters of a nuclear segmentation algorithm to maximize the quality of image segmentation results while minimizing the execution time. It implements several optimization methods to search the parameter space efficiently. In addition, the methodology is developed to execute on high-performance computing systems to reduce the execution time of the parameter tuning phase. These capabilities are packaged in a Docker container for easy deployment and can be used through a friendly interface extension in 3D Slicer. Our results using three real-world image segmentation workflows demonstrate that the proposed solution is able to (1) search a small fraction (about 100 points) of the parameter space, which contains billions to trillions of points, and improve the quality of segmentation output by × 1.20, × 1.29, and × 1.29, on average; (2) decrease the execution time of a segmentation workflow by up to 11.79× while improving output quality; and (3) effectively use parallel systems to accelerate parameter tuning and segmentation phases.

Keywords:  Cancer; Cell morphology; Computer-assisted image analysis; Digital pathology; Parameter auto-tuning

Year:  2019        PMID: 30402669      PMCID: PMC6499855          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0138-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  43 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.

Authors:  W C Allsbrook; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; R B Lane; C G Lane; J I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Tuner: principled parameter finding for image segmentation algorithms using visual response surface exploration.

Authors:  Thomas Torsney-Weir; Ahmed Saad; Torsten Möller; Britta Weber; Hans-Christian Hege; Jean-Marc Verbavatz; Steven Bergner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  Is a single energy functional sufficient? Adaptive energy functionals and automatic initialization.

Authors:  Chris McIntosh; Ghassan Hamarneh
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2007

4.  Expert second-opinion pathology review of lymphoma in the era of the World Health Organization classification.

Authors:  M J Matasar; W Shi; J Silberstien; O Lin; K J Busam; J Teruya-Feldstein; D A Filippa; A D Zelenetz; A Noy
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Histopathological image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Laura E Boucheron; Ali Can; Anant Madabhushi; Nasir M Rajpoot; B Yener
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-30

6.  Molecular subtype can predict the response and outcome of Chinese locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with preoperative therapy.

Authors:  Xiao Song Chen; Jia Yi Wu; Ou Huang; Can Ming Chen; Jiong Wu; Jin Song Lu; Zhi Ming Shao; Zhen Zhou Shen; Kun Wei Shen
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Interobserver variability in histologic evaluation of radical prostatectomy between central and local pathologists: findings of TAX 3501 multinational clinical trial.

Authors:  George J Netto; Mario Eisenberger; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Computer-aided Prognosis of Neuroblastoma on Whole-slide Images: Classification of Stromal Development.

Authors:  O Sertel; J Kong; H Shimada; U V Catalyurek; J H Saltz; M N Gurcan
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.740

9.  The impact of inter-observer variation in pathological assessment of node-negative breast cancer on clinical risk assessment and patient selection for adjuvant systemic treatment.

Authors:  J M Bueno-de-Mesquita; D S A Nuyten; J Wesseling; H van Tinteren; S C Linn; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Bone marrow pathology in essential thrombocythemia: interobserver reliability and utility for identifying disease subtypes.

Authors:  Bridget S Wilkins; Wendy N Erber; David Bareford; Georgina Buck; Keith Wheatley; Clare L East; Beverley Paul; Claire N Harrison; Anthony R Green; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.