Literature DB >> 15041383

History of C2 monitoring in heart and liver transplant patients treated with cyclosporine microemulsion.

M Cantarovich1, J Barkun, N Giannetti, R Cecere, J-G Besner, J Tchervenkov.   

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring of CsA has evolved since the introduction of CsA microemulsion. The purpose of the present review is to summarize the history of CsA concentration 2 hours postdose (C2) monitoring in heart and liver transplantation. C2 has been shown to be the best single time point that correlates with the area-under-the-curve, with a correlation coefficient (r2) ranging between .83 and.93. C2 monitoring (300 to 600 ng/mL) has resulted in a significant clinical benefit in long-term heart and liver transplant patients compared to trough level (C0) monitoring. Moreover, a C2 range of 300 to 600 ng/mL resulted in a similar calcineurin inhibition compared to a C2 range of 700 to 1000 ng/mL or a C0 range of 100 to 200 ng/mL while being less injurious to renal function. In de novo liver transplant patients not receiving induction therapy, the achievement of a target C2 of 850 to 1400 ng/mL by postoperative day 3 has resulted in a low acute rejection rate. Furthermore, C2 monitoring has been associated with a lower rejection rate in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative patients and with an overall lesser severity of acute rejection compared to C0 monitoring. In de novo heart transplant patients who receive antithymocyte globulin induction, a lower C2 range may be sufficient to prevent rejection and renal dysfunction. Future studies should help to fine-tune the optimal C2 range in heart or liver transplant patients receiving induction therapy and different maintenance immunosuppressive combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15041383     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  2 in total

1.  Optimal sampling time-point for cyclosporin A concentration monitoring in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yixin Jia; Xu Meng; Yan Li; Chunlei Xu; Wen Zeng; Yuqing Jiao; Wei Han
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression after heart transplantation: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised trials.

Authors:  Luit Penninga; Christian H Møller; Finn Gustafsson; Daniel A Steinbrüchel; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.953

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.