Literature DB >> 30399418

How do spatially distinct frequency specific MEG networks emerge from one underlying structural connectome? The role of the structural eigenmodes.

Prejaas Tewarie1, Romesh Abeysuriya2, Áine Byrne3, George C O'Neill4, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos5, Matthew J Brookes4, Stephen Coombes6.   

Abstract

Functional networks obtained from magnetoencephalography (MEG) from different frequency bands show distinct spatial patterns. It remains to be elucidated how distinct spatial patterns in MEG networks emerge given a single underlying structural network. Recent work has suggested that the eigenmodes of the structural network might serve as a basis set for functional network patterns in the case of functional MRI. Here, we take this notion further in the context of frequency band specific MEG networks. We show that a selected set of eigenmodes of the structural network can predict different frequency band specific networks in the resting state, ranging from delta (1-4 Hz) to the high gamma band (40-70 Hz). These predictions outperform predictions based from surrogate data, suggesting a genuine relationship between eigenmodes of the structural network and frequency specific MEG networks. We then show that the relevant set of eigenmodes can be excited in a network of neural mass models using linear stability analysis only by including delays. Excitation of an eigenmode in this context refers to a dynamic instability of a network steady state to a spatial pattern with a corresponding coherent temporal oscillation. Simulations verify the results from linear stability analysis and suggest that theta, alpha and beta band networks emerge very near to the bifurcation. The delta and gamma bands in the resting state emerges further away from the bifurcation. These results show for the first time how delayed interactions can excite the relevant set of eigenmodes that give rise to frequency specific functional connectivity patterns.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Eigenmodes; Functional connectivity; MEG; Magnetoencephalography; Neural mass; Neural mass bifurcation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30399418     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Structure-function coupling as a correlate and potential biomarker of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Shanna D Kulik; Ilse M Nauta; Prejaas Tewarie; Ismail Koubiyr; Edwin van Dellen; Aurelie Ruet; Kim A Meijer; Brigit A de Jong; Cornelis J Stam; Arjan Hillebrand; Jeroen J G Geurts; Linda Douw; Menno M Schoonheim
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Optimization of graph construction can significantly increase the power of structural brain network studies.

Authors:  Eirini Messaritaki; Stavros I Dimitriadis; Derek K Jones
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  How Sensitive Are Conventional MEG Functional Connectivity Metrics With Sliding Windows to Detect Genuine Fluctuations in Dynamic Functional Connectivity?

Authors:  Lucrezia Liuzzi; Andrew J Quinn; George C O'Neill; Mark W Woolrich; Matthew J Brookes; Arjan Hillebrand; Prejaas Tewarie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Graph neural fields: A framework for spatiotemporal dynamical models on the human connectome.

Authors:  Marco Aqil; Selen Atasoy; Morten L Kringelbach; Rikkert Hindriks
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Computational Models in Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Katharina Glomb; Joana Cabral; Anna Cattani; Alberto Mazzoni; Ashish Raj; Benedetta Franceschiello
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Predicting time-resolved electrophysiological brain networks from structural eigenmodes.

Authors:  Prejaas Tewarie; Bastian Prasse; Jil Meier; Kanad Mandke; Shaun Warrington; Cornelis J Stam; Matthew J Brookes; Piet Van Mieghem; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Arjan Hillebrand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 7.  Structure-function models of temporal, spatial, and spectral characteristics of non-invasive whole brain functional imaging.

Authors:  Ashish Raj; Parul Verma; Srikantan Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Disruption in structural-functional network repertoire and time-resolved subcortical fronto-temporoparietal connectivity in disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Jitka Annen; Prejaas Tewarie; Rajanikant Panda; Aurore Thibaut; Ane Lopez-Gonzalez; Anira Escrichs; Mohamed Ali Bahri; Arjan Hillebrand; Gustavo Deco; Steven Laureys; Olivia Gosseries
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Predicting MEG resting-state functional connectivity from microstructural information.

Authors:  Eirini Messaritaki; Sonya Foley; Simona Schiavi; Lorenzo Magazzini; Bethany Routley; Derek K Jones; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  The role of node dynamics in shaping emergent functional connectivity patterns in the brain.

Authors:  Michael Forrester; Jonathan J Crofts; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Stephen Coombes; Reuben D O'Dea
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.