Yong Ai1,2, Andrii Kovalchuk1,2, Xinkai Qiu1,2, Yanxi Zhang1,2, Sumit Kumar1,2, Xintai Wang3, Martin Kühnel3, Kasper Nørgaard3, Ryan C Chiechi1,2. 1. Stratingh Institute for Chemistry , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands. 2. Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands. 3. Nano-Science Center & Department of Chemistry , University of Copenhagen , Universitetsparken 5 , DK-2100 Copenhagen , Denmark.
Abstract
This paper describes tunneling junctions comprising self-assembled monolayers that can be converted between resistor and diode functionality in-place. The rectification ratio is affected by the hydration of densely packed carboxylic acid groups at the interface between the top-contact and the monolayer. We studied this process by treatment with water and a water scavenger using three different top-contacts, eutectic Ga-In (EGaIn), conducting-probe atomic force microscopy (CP-AFM), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), demonstrating that the phenomena is molecular in nature and is not platform-speciffc. We propose a mechanism in which the tunneling junctions convert to diode behavior through the lowering of the LUMO, which is suffcient to bring it close to resonance at positive bias, potentially assisted by a Stark shift. This shift in energy is supported by calculations and a change in polarization observed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Kelvin probe measurements. We demonstrate light-driven modulation using spiropyran as a photoacid, suggesting that any chemical process that is coupled to the release of small molecules that can tightly bind carboxylic acid groups can be used as an external stimulus to modulate rectification. The ability to convert a tunneling junction reversibly between a diode and a resistor via an effect that is intrinsic to the molecules in the junction extends the possible applications of Molecular Electronics to reconfigurable circuits and other new functionalities that do not have direct analogs in conventional semiconductor devices.
This paper describes tunneling junctions comprising self-assembled monolayers that can be converted between resistor and diode functionality in-place. The rectification ratio is affected by the hydration of densely packed carboxylic acid groups at the interface between the top-contact and the monolayer. We studied this process by treatment with water and a water scavenger using three different top-contacts, eutectic Ga-In (EGaIn), conducting-probe atomic force microscopy (CP-AFM), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), demonstrating that the phenomena is molecular in nature and is not platform-speciffc. We propose a mechanism in which the tunneling junctions convert to diode behavior through the lowering of the LUMO, which is suffcient to bring it close to resonance at positive bias, potentially assisted by a Stark shift. This shift in energy is supported by calculations and a change in polarization observed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Kelvin probe measurements. We demonstrate light-driven modulation using spiropyran as a photoacid, suggesting that any chemical process that is coupled to the release of small molecules that can tightly bind carboxylic acid groups can be used as an external stimulus to modulate rectification. The ability to convert a tunneling junction reversibly between a diode and a resistor via an effect that is intrinsic to the molecules in the junction extends the possible applications of Molecular Electronics to reconfigurable circuits and other new functionalities that do not have direct analogs in conventional semiconductor devices.
Modern information
technology
relies on computational platforms across a broad range of length-scales
from embedded, Internet of Things devices to personal, mobile devices
to supercomputing clusters to data centers. These platforms increasingly
demand specialized electronics suited to a particular application,
e.g., low-power and neuromorphic chips.[1] Molecular electronics (the transport of charge through molecules
spanning two or more electrodes) has tremendous potential for specialized
computation because changes at the Ångstrom-scale can translate
into exponential effects at the device level.[2] And because the functional units are molecules, these effects can
arise from chemical phenomena like photoisomerization.[3,4] Molecular diodes, the basis of logic circuits,[5] are now well established in both single-molecule junctions[6] and devices[7] comprising
self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) with eutectic Ga–In (EGaIn)
top-contacts.[8] However, the realization
of new concepts in computation requires new functionality that exploits
the chemical nature of molecular electronics.This paper describes
the reversible interconversion of molecular
tunneling junctions comprising SAMs between diodes and resistors.
The molecules in the SAM are terminated by carboxylic groups (CO2H), which, when densely packed, can bind water tightly, affecting
surface states in the SAM and the electronic structure of the molecules
therein, hence the current density vs voltage (J/V) characteristics. The rectification ratio, R = |J(V+)/J(V–)|, of tunneling junctions
comprising SAMs is highly sensitive both to the structure of the SAM
and to the molecules in the SAM and can be tuned synthetically, i.e.,
by comparing R between junctions formed from structurally
similar SAMs.[9,10] Rectification can also be induced
by breaking the symmetry of electrodes in an electrochemical (ionic)
environment.[11] However, these approaches
cannot produce a junction whose function can be changed in-place because
they rely either on comparing different SAMs or different environments
around a transient single-molecule junction. And, while it is possible
to affect R by altering the relative humidity,[12] the state of the junction depends on the environment
surrounding the experimental setup during measurement; the value of R is, therefore, transient and specific to one experimental
platform. Similarly, both R and conductance can be
affected by changes to the hydration state of specific substrates
supporting monolayers.[13] However, because
we alter the properties of the SAM in-place and independently of the
experimental platform, electrodes, and the conditions under which
the junctions are measured, a junction can be converted between diode
and a resistor behavior by switching the SAM itself between persistent
rectifying and nonrectifying states. Moreover, through the use of
a photoacid, we demonstrate that this process can be coupled to light
and, therefore, any extrinsic phenomenon that generates (or absorbs)
free protons.
Results and Discussion
Electrical Measurements
We followed
literature procedures
for forming high-quality SAMs of long-chain ω-thiol carboxylic
acids, which require care to avoid the formation of bilayers and internally
hydrogen-bonded structures.[14] To ensure
that the resulting SAMs are fully protonated, we grew the SAMs in
dry ethanol (EtOH) and compared them to SAMs grown in EtOH acidified
with acetic acid[15] and found no difference
in the J/V characteristics. We grew
the SAMs on either template-stripped[16] Au
(AuTS) or vapor deposited Au (AuVD) and formed
AuTS/SAM//EGaIn, AuTS/SAM//AuAFM,
and AuVD/SAM //rGO junctions where “/’ and
‘//” denote covalent and van der Waals contacts, respectively,
AuAFM is a gold-coated atomic force microscopy (AFM) tip,
and rGO is reduced graphene oxide.[17] Using
EGaIn and AuAFM top-contacts, we altered the J/V characteristics from the as-prepared, nonrectifying
(resistor) to the rectifying (diode) state by exposure to water or
a photoacid and back to the nonrectifying state using 2,2-dimethoxypropane
(DMP) as a water scavenger[18] or NaOH in
EtOH as an anhydrous base. In the presence of catalytic acid (e.g.,
RCO2H) DMP reactions quantitatively with water to form
acetone and methanol. The junctions are stable in both states; exposure
to ambient conditions does not increase R over time
and exposure to high vacuum (down to 1 × 10–8 mbar) or heating to 80 °C in moderate vacuum does not decrease
it (Figure S2).Figure a shows the value of log|R| over two complete cycles of alternating exposure to H2O and DMP, and Figure b shows semilog plots of log|R| vs potential
(R/V) curves of AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions. Each value
of log|R| is the peak of a Gaussian fit to a histogram
of log|R| for that value of |V|,
and the shaded areas are the 99% confidence intervals. These measurements
were performed inside a flowbox with 1–3% O2 in
N2 and relative humidity (RH) < 10%.[19] (The presence of O2 is necessary to form tips
of EGaIn.) It is possible that the nonzero RH induces the small degree
of rectification in the as-prepared SAMs (the dashed line in Figure b shows a perfect
resistor, log|R| = 0) or that the asymmetric nature
of AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn
junctions introduces a slight asymmetry in the J/V characteristics.[7] However,
after exposure to H2O (vapor or liquid), increases exponentially
with |V|. (We reiterate that the SAMs are grown in
rigorously anhydrous conditions and are always measured under controlled
and invariant conditions; the exposure to H2O alters the
intrinsic properties of the SAM and occurs completely spatially and
temporally separate from the measurement.) An obvious explanation
for the increase in log|R| is that H2O
in the junction undergoes redox chemistry and the R/V dependence is simply a reflection of the different
oxidation reduction potentials; however, that behavior is both time-dependent
and hysteretic,[20] neither of which is true
for the junctions we measured (Figure S4). Moreover, subsequent exposure to a 1:1 by volume solution of DMP
in ethanol returns the R/V curve
to the pristine, nonrectifying state, which is a clear indication
that no irreversible processes occur during J/V cycling in the rectifying state (i.e., after exposure
to H2O). We hypothesize that the primary cause of the dampening
is mechanical stress to the SAM from repeated exposure to H2O and DMP between measurements. Although the magnitude of the change
in R dampens, the fact that the junctions survive
multiple cycles proves that the underlying mechanism is inherently
reversible and can therefore likely be improved with better molecular
design and junction/device optimizations. Moreover, the magnitude
of log|R| is already among the higher values reported
(Figure S3).
Figure 1
In-place modulation of
the rectification of junctions comprising
SAMs of S(CH2)11CO2H. (a) log|R| at 1.5 V versus H2O/2,2-dimethoxypropane exposure
cycles for AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions. (b) Semilog plots of the rectification ratio
(log|R|) versus absolute potential (|V|) for AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions before and after the SAMs are treated with H2O or H2O and then DMP. Black, pristine, as-prepared;
red, after exposure to H2O (l); blue, after exposure to
H2O (l) and then DMP; green, after exposure to H2O (g); magenta, after exposure to H2O (g) and then DMP.
(c) Plots of log|R| versus |V| for
AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//AuAFM junctions after the SAMs are treated with H2O or H2O and then DMP. black, pristine; red, after exposure
to H2O (g); blue, after exposure to H2O (g)
and then DMP. (d) Plots of log|R| versus |V| for AuVD/S(CH2)15CH3//rGO (black) and AuVD/S(CH2)15CO2H//rGO (red) junctions.
In-place modulation of
the rectification of junctions comprising
SAMs of S(CH2)11CO2H. (a) log|R| at 1.5 V versus H2O/2,2-dimethoxypropane exposure
cycles for AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions. (b) Semilog plots of the rectification ratio
(log|R|) versus absolute potential (|V|) for AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions before and after the SAMs are treated with H2O or H2O and then DMP. Black, pristine, as-prepared;
red, after exposure to H2O (l); blue, after exposure to
H2O (l) and then DMP; green, after exposure to H2O (g); magenta, after exposure to H2O (g) and then DMP.
(c) Plots of log|R| versus |V| for
AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//AuAFM junctions after the SAMs are treated with H2O or H2O and then DMP. black, pristine; red, after exposure
to H2O (g); blue, after exposure to H2O (g)
and then DMP. (d) Plots of log|R| versus |V| for AuVD/S(CH2)15CH3//rGO (black) and AuVD/S(CH2)15CO2H//rGO (red) junctions.The rate of tunneling charge transport through S(CH2)15CH3 (C16) and oligophenyleneethynylene junctions
is sensitive to both ambient humidity and exposure H2O
(g), which affects the height of the tunneling barrier.[21,22] However, exposure to H2O (g) and/or H2O (l)
does not affect log|R| for AuTS/SAM//EGaIn
junctions comprising C16 or S(CH2)11CH3 (Figure S5). The simplest, most robust,
and widely accepted measure of the barrier height of a tunneling junction
is the tunneling decay coefficient, β, which is extracted from J = J0 e–β where d is the barrier width and J0 is the theoretical value of J when d = 0. Although the rate of tunneling and
the details of the energy landscape within a tunneling junction depend
on many factors, β is defined only by the average height of
the tunneling barrier ϕ and the constants ℏ and m; . Thus, the magnitude
of β directly
reflects the difference in energy between the Fermi level Ef and the most accessible molecular orbital,
and if the change in R were the result of changes
to molecular orbital states or symmetry (as is the case in ref (12)), β would differ
in the nonrectifying and rectifying states.We determined β
for the series {S(CH2)7CO2H, S(CH2)11CO2H, S(CH2)15CO2H} in the nonrectifying and rectifying
states (by exposure to H2O (g), Figure ). The low-bias value of β = 0.55–1 is lower than the consensus value of 0.70 Å–1 for SAMs of alkanethiolates,[23−25] but it does
not differ significantly between the nonrectifying and rectifying
states, indicating that the mechanism of rectification does not involve
changing the average barrier height that is imposed by the aliphatic
molecular backbone. Thus, the effects of exposure to H2O are likely confined to the SAM//top-contact interface via strong
interactions between the terminal CO2H groups and H2O, which is supported spectroscopically (see below) and by
the observation that H2O does not desorb in vacuum with
heating (Figure S2).
Figure 2
Plots of ln|J| versus |V| of
AuTS/S(CH2)CO2H//EGaIn junctions where n = 7, 11, 15 in
the nonrectifying (a) and rectifying (c) states. The tunneling decay
coefficient, β, extracted from fits of ln|J| versus molecular length (Å) show a weak, approximately symmetric
voltage dependence in the nonrectifying (b) and rectifying (d) state.
Plots of ln|J| versus |V| of
AuTS/S(CH2)CO2H//EGaIn junctions where n = 7, 11, 15 in
the nonrectifying (a) and rectifying (c) states. The tunneling decay
coefficient, β, extracted from fits of ln|J| versus molecular length (Å) show a weak, approximately symmetric
voltage dependence in the nonrectifying (b) and rectifying (d) state.It is possible to induce rectification
(with symmetric molecules)
in molecular tunneling junctions by altering the electric double layer
of the electrodes such that they experience different electrostatic
environments.[11] This mechanism is plausible,
as EGaIn forms a 7 Å thick layer of Ga2O3 that should interact strongly with both carboxylic acids and water.[26] However, Figure c shows R/V curves
for AuTSS/(CH2)11CO2H//AuAFM junctions, which exhibit the same behavior as AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions;
as-prepared SAMs do not rectify until exposed to H2O (l)
and they return to their initial state upon exposure to DMP. A mechanism
that depends on the electrodes should show markedly different behavior
between dissimilar AuTS/EGaIn and nearly identical AuTS/AuAFM pairs of electrodes. To exclude electrode
effects completely, we measured AuTS/S(CH2)15CO2H//rGO junctions; however, without in situ
access to the SAM, we compared the rectifying state (because the devices
are prepared in a water bath) to AuTS/S(CH2)15CH3//rGO junctions. Figure d shows an abrupt increase in log|R| around 1.5 for the CO2H-terminated SAMs that
is absent for the alkaneSAMs. Thus, the effect is entirely molecular
and independent of the identity and composition of the electrodes.
This is an important observation, as it means that the underlying
mechanism of rectification switching is generalizable and can be utilized
in any present or future device platform.
Mechanism of Rectification
For insight into the influence
of bound water on the electronic structure of the SAMs, we characterized
SAMs of S(CH2)11CO2H by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) in the pristine state, after exposure to water,
and after subsequent treatment with DMP. These data are summarized
in Figure . The three
main peaks in the C1s core-level region correspond
to aliphatic CH2–CH2, CH2–S,
and CO2Hcarbons.[27,28] The binding energies
associated with these carbons in both the pristine and DMP-treated
SAMs (i.e., the nonrectifying sates) are 285.1 eV, 286.6 and 288.8
eV, respectively. In the C 1s spectra of the SAMs in the rectifying
state (i.e., after exposure to H2O, but before DMP treatment),
the CO2H peak shifts to a higher binding energy by 0.3
eV, suggesting that the CO2H group becomes more electropositive
when complexed with water.[27,39] Simultaneously, the
aliphatic CH2–CH2 and CH2–S
peaks shift to lower binding energies by 0.3 and 0.2 eV, which indicates
that the SAM becomes polarized when water binds. Kelvin-probe AFM
(KPFM) shows that the work function of SAMs of S(CH2)11CO2H is approximately 600 meV higher than that
of their S(CH2)11CH3 alkane analogues
and confirms the increased polarization at the CO2H terminus
of the SAM when water binds, which shifts it higher by approximately
an additional 135 meV (Figure S9). This
increase in polarization may also explain the small differences in
the bias-dependence of β (Figure ) between the rectifying and nonrectifying states.
Figure 3
C 1s core
X-ray photoemission spectra of SAMs of S(CH2)11CO2H before and after exposure to H2O and H2O subsequent treatment with DMP. Top: C
1s core-level region of a pristine SAM showing three main peaks located
at 285.1, 286.6, and 288.8 eV, corresponding to CH2 aliphatic,
CH2–S, and CO2H, respectively. Center:
After exposure to H2O (l), the CO2H peak shifts
0.3 eV to higher binding energy while the CH2 aliphatic
and CH2–S peaks shift 0.3 eV to lower binding energy.
Bottom: After exposure to H2O and then DMP, the three main
C 1s peaks shift back to their initial position with respect to the
pristine state.
C 1s core
X-ray photoemission spectra of SAMs of S(CH2)11CO2H before and after exposure to H2O and H2O subsequent treatment with DMP. Top: C
1s core-level region of a pristine SAM showing three main peaks located
at 285.1, 286.6, and 288.8 eV, corresponding to CH2 aliphatic,
CH2–S, and CO2H, respectively. Center:
After exposure to H2O (l), the CO2H peak shifts
0.3 eV to higher binding energy while the CH2 aliphatic
and CH2–S peaks shift 0.3 eV to lower binding energy.
Bottom: After exposure to H2O and then DMP, the three main
C 1s peaks shift back to their initial position with respect to the
pristine state.Although the shifts in
binding energies are small, they are within
the resolution of the instrument and are reproducible and the Au 4f
peaks are invariant (see Figure S1 and
related discussion in the Supporting Information). Importantly, all three C 1s peaks return to the binding energies
of the pristine state after exposure to H2O and subsequent
treatment with DMP, indicating that the effects of binding H2O are chemically reversible. Thus, the dampening effect in Figure is not due to irreversible
chemical processes and is most likely physical stress that introduces
disorder, pinholes, and so forth. This type of fatigue can be mitigated
through the optimization or use of different device platforms[30,31] much more readily than chemical fatigue.Based on the experimental
data described above, we describe the
SAMs in the rectifying state as being formally hydrated by water:
CO2H·H2O. This is an imperfect description
because we cannot know the stoichiometry of the complexation in the
SAM and solution-phase phenomena do not always directly map onto surface-chemistry
phenomena. For example, exposing SAMs bearing terminal CO2H groups to H2O can form up to six monolayers[32] of H2O. However, we would expect
physisorbed water to promote electrochemical processes under bias
for which, as described above, there is no evidence. Given that we
dry the SAMs thoroughly after exposure to H2O and only
treatment with DMP is sufficient to restore the SAMs to the pristine,
nonrectifying state, we propose that, in the rectifying state, the
SAMs bear a (partial) monolayer of tightly bound H2O, which
is best described as CO2H·H2O.While
it is possible that the dipoles arising from the polarization
of the SAM directly lead to rectification,[33,34] the magnitude of log|R| suggests the involvement
of frontier molecular orbitals.[35] The XPS
and KPFM data show that the polarization of SAMs of S(CH2)CO2H·H2O
translates into a lowering of frontier orbitals both from the increased
electronegativity of the terminal CO2H groups and the increased
work function, i.e., binding H2O lowers the absolute and
relative energy of the LUMO. The direction of the rectification, J(+V) > J(−V), implicates the LUMO as the dominant frontier orbital;[35,36] however, variable-temperature measurements reveal a lack of thermally
activated processes (Figure e), thus we can exclude a tunneling-hopping mechanism.[37] Instead, we propose the mechanism shown in Figure , in which the binding
of water to the carboxylic acid groups brings the LUMO sufficiently
close to the Fermi level that its tail is brought into resonance with
the bottom electrode at bias. This mechanism is consistent with the
observation that rectification is conserved across electrode pairs
of AuTS/EGaIn, AuTS/AuAFM, and AuVD/rGO. It is further supported by the observation that the
conductance drops upon binding water, except at positive bias above
a certain threshold; the binding of water increases the width of the
tunneling barrier, decreasing the conductance until a threshold bias
at which the tail of the LUMO crosses Ef (Figure b and d).
Figure 4
Proposed
mechanism of rectification. Frontier orbitals are depicted
as purple (LUMO) and orange (HOMO) Lorentzians. Solid lines indicate
the relative positions when the vacuum level is shifted by the applied
field. Dashed lines depict the direction of the Stark shift according
to ab initio OVGF calculations (seethe Supporting Information). The Fermi level of the substrate is indicated
as Ef, and the offset between the peak
of the orbitals and the electrodes is indicated by ε, which
is shifted by an amount eV at the grounded electrode. (a) In the nonrectifying
(resistor) state, both frontier orbtials are relatively far from Ef, resulting in symmetric J/V curves within the accessible bias window. (b)
In the rectifying (diode) state, the complexation of water creates
a surface dipole that shifts the vacuum level in the same direction
as positive bias, bringing the LUMO closer to Ef such that the tail can cross Ef at positive bias, giving rise to asymmetric J/V curves. (c) B3LYP/Def2QZVPP HOMO and LUMO orbitals of
HS(CH2)11CO2H·H2O.
(d) Plots of log|J| versus applied bias (V) of AuTS/S(CH2)11COOH//EGaIn
junctions in the pristine, nonrectifying (black squares) and rectifying
(red circles) states. Each data point is the mean value from a Gaussian
fit to a histogram of log|J| for a value of V. The error bars are the 95 confidence intervals of the
fit. The J/V data are approximately
symmetric in the nonrectifying state. After exposure to H2O (l), log|J| decreases by approximately 1.5 until
a threshold positive bias at which point it rises sharply, giving
rise to rectification. (e) Plots of log|I| at 0.50
V as a function of inverse temperature for AuTS/S(CH2)15CO2H//EGaIn junctions in the pristine,
nonrectifying state (black squares) and rectifying state (red circles)
suggesting the absence of thermally activated processes.
Proposed
mechanism of rectification. Frontier orbitals are depicted
as purple (LUMO) and orange (HOMO) Lorentzians. Solid lines indicate
the relative positions when the vacuum level is shifted by the applied
field. Dashed lines depict the direction of the Stark shift according
to ab initio OVGF calculations (seethe Supporting Information). The Fermi level of the substrate is indicated
as Ef, and the offset between the peak
of the orbitals and the electrodes is indicated by ε, which
is shifted by an amount eV at the grounded electrode. (a) In the nonrectifying
(resistor) state, both frontier orbtials are relatively far from Ef, resulting in symmetric J/V curves within the accessible bias window. (b)
In the rectifying (diode) state, the complexation of water creates
a surface dipole that shifts the vacuum level in the same direction
as positive bias, bringing the LUMO closer to Ef such that the tail can cross Ef at positive bias, giving rise to asymmetric J/V curves. (c) B3LYP/Def2QZVPP HOMO and LUMO orbitals of
HS(CH2)11CO2H·H2O.
(d) Plots of log|J| versus applied bias (V) of AuTS/S(CH2)11COOH//EGaIn
junctions in the pristine, nonrectifying (black squares) and rectifying
(red circles) states. Each data point is the mean value from a Gaussian
fit to a histogram of log|J| for a value of V. The error bars are the 95 confidence intervals of the
fit. The J/V data are approximately
symmetric in the nonrectifying state. After exposure to H2O (l), log|J| decreases by approximately 1.5 until
a threshold positive bias at which point it rises sharply, giving
rise to rectification. (e) Plots of log|I| at 0.50
V as a function of inverse temperature for AuTS/S(CH2)15CO2H//EGaIn junctions in the pristine,
nonrectifying state (black squares) and rectifying state (red circles)
suggesting the absence of thermally activated processes.Given that the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP gas-phase energy
of the LUMO of
S(CH2)11CO2H·H2O
is −0.06 eV, the expectation is that, at zero bias, the HOMO
(−6.46 eV) would dominate tunneling charge-transport (at least
in single-molecule junctions). Rectification, however, is observed
in SAMs and at bias, which shifts the vacuum level and which can induce
Stark shifts that alter the positions and energies of atomic and/or
molecular orbitals in the presence of an electric field. Frisbie et
al. recently examined the Stark effect in Au/S(CH2) CH3//AuAFM junctions,
where n = 7,8,9,10,12, using ab initio outer-valence
Greens function (OVGF) calculations.[38] They
found a linear dependence of the energy of the HOMO on the applied
field and an approximately parabolic dependence of the LUMO, centered
around zero, concluding that transport is dominated by the HOMO, which
tracks with the tip bias such that it moves closer to Ef at negative bias. The resulting asymmetry in the I/V data is very small because most of
the voltage drops at the Au–S interface. We applied the same
methodology to HS(CH2)11CO2H and
HS(CH2)11CO2H·H2O
to examine the influence of the additional molecular orbtials localized
on the carboxylic acid group, finding the same dependence of the HOMO
and LUMO on applied field (Figure S7).
These shifts are depicted with dashed-line curves in Figure a and b, which either add to
or subtract from the vacuum-level shift induced by the electric field.
In the nonrectifying state, the LUMO does not play a substantial role
(Figure a); however,
the complexation of water makes the terminal CO2H group
more electropositive (Figures and S9), lowering the LUMO and
inducing a dipole moment at the surface that adds to the Stark shift
at positive bias and subtracts from it at negative bias (Figures b and S7). The HOMO is localized at the thiol (and
hybridized with the substrate), shifted down in energy with respect
to its alkyl analogue, and its contribution to tunneling charge-transport
is, therefore, small and constant in both states. Figure c shows isoplots of the frontier
orbtials. The presence of H2O does not affect the isoplots
in these minimized geometries and, for single molecules in the gas
phase, has a negligible impact on the energies of the orbitals, shifting
them by only 0.08.eV.
Light-Driven Switching
Treatment
with H2O and DMP to affect R is a direct
chemical input
in that it requires physically exposing a SAM to either H2O or a solution containing DMP. Photoacids trigger the release of
acidic protons upon treatment with light. Thus, if protic species
other than H2O can also induce polarization at the CO2H interface, it should be possible to affect R with light. For example, a photoacid dissolved in an alcohol produces
equilibrium amounts of ROH2+, which could potentially
serve as a proxy for H2O to affect switching optically
rather than physically.To explore the role of H2O in the polarization of CO2H groups, we examined the
influence of pH on log by |R| treating the as-prepared
SAMs with aqueous solutions of 1 × 10–4 M HCl,
1 × 10–4 M CH3CO2H, and
3% NH4OH. All three induced rectifying behavior, while
1 × 10–4 M NaOH in anhydrous ethanol did not
(Figure S6). This observation confirms
that the SAMs bind H2O irrespective of pH and that, upon
removal from contact with water (vapor or liquid), they are polarized
through strong interactions between CO2H and H2O. It also suggests that labile protons play an important role. The
acid/base properties of SAMs bearing CO2H groups is counterintuitive
since the pKa of free CO2H
groups is about 3–5; however, bulk dissociation constants do
not directly inform the protonation/charge state of interfaces[39] and SAMs bearing CO2H can be protonated
by HCl in methanol, resulting in a positive ζ-potential.[29] When packed into a SAM, ΔG of (de)protonation is strongly affected by the van der Waals interactions
between the alkane backbones and the intermolecular hydrogen bonding
of the CO2H groups; The effective pKa of SAMs of carboxylic acids increases by up to 4 pKa units and is sensitive to chain-lengths.[40] This behavior is due to the fact that protonation
creates more hydrogen bonds while simultaneously causing Coulomb repulsion;
the former is energetically favorable, while the latter becomes increasingly
unfavorable as van der Waals interactions in the backbone are disrupted.
That balance is why increasing the radius of curvature of nanoparticles
decorated with CO2H-terminated ligands increases their
pKa.[41] It should
be possible, therefore, to trigger the rectifying state of SAMs of
S(CH2)nCO2H by exposure to
a sufficiently strong acid.Having already determined that aqueous
acids have little impact
on the magnitude of log|R|, we chose a merocyanine
salt (MCH+Cl–) that is a relatively weak
acid. Exposure to blue light induces a ring-closure to form spiropyran
(SP) and HCl (pKa ≈ −8 in
water). We chose MCH+Cl– in anhydrous
ethanol because it is well-characterized[42] and has been shown to protonate CO2H-terminated SAMs
upon photoinduced ring-closure to SP.[29] The switching process and a schematic of the resulting protonation
is shown in Figure a, and the resulting R/V data are
shown in Figure b.
Exposure to 1 mM ethanolic solutions of MCH+Cl– for 30 min has no effect on log|R| for Au/S(CH2)11COOH//EGaIn junctions, indicating that the pKa of MCH+Cl– in
ethanol is too high to protonate CO2H-terminated SAMs directly.
With the addition of blue (350–450 nm) light, however, the
junctions switch to the rectifying state, producing R/V curves that are almost indistinguishable from
those that result from exposure to H2O (Figure b). We attribute this result
to the protonation of the terminal CO2H groups by HCl,
which can be thought of as CO2H·HCl insofar as the
rectifying behavior is the same as CO2H·H2O and the work function shifts downward by an additional 25 meV.
Figure 5
Converting
between a nonrectifying and rectifying states using
a photoacid. (a) When MCH+Cl–, a relatively
weak acid, dissolved in anhydrous ethanol is exposed to blue (350–450
nm) light, it loses a proton and undergoes a reversible ring-closure
to form SP, generating HCl, which is a sufficiently strong acid to
protonate the CO2H-terminated SAM, forming CO2H·HCl. (b) Semilog plots of log|R| versus |V| for AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions before and after the SAMs are exposed to
MCH+Cl–, light (), or MCH+Cl– with light.
Black, pristine; orange, exposure to for 30 min; blue, exposure to 1 mM MCH+Cl– in anhydrous ethanol for 30; red, exposure to 1 MCH+Cl– in anydrous ethanol and for 30 min.
Converting
between a nonrectifying and rectifying states using
a photoacid. (a) When MCH+Cl–, a relatively
weak acid, dissolved in anhydrous ethanol is exposed to blue (350–450
nm) light, it loses a proton and undergoes a reversible ring-closure
to form SP, generating HCl, which is a sufficiently strong acid to
protonate the CO2H-terminated SAM, forming CO2H·HCl. (b) Semilog plots of log|R| versus |V| for AuTS/S(CH2)11CO2H//EGaIn junctions before and after the SAMs are exposed to
MCH+Cl–, light (), or MCH+Cl– with light.
Black, pristine; orange, exposure to for 30 min; blue, exposure to 1 mM MCH+Cl– in anhydrous ethanol for 30; red, exposure to 1 MCH+Cl– in anydrous ethanol and for 30 min.In conclusion, the ability to alter the function of a tunneling
junction reversibly between resistor and diode creates the possibility
of fabricating molecular-electronic devices that exhibit unique functions
that are difficult or impossible to achieve with conventional semiconductor
technology. Because rectification is self-referencing (i.e., it is
independent of the absolute magnitude of J), rectification-modulation
can potentially be used as a sensor or dosimeter. Although we used
exposure to H2O to characterize the effect and prove that
it is molecular in nature, the XPS spectra and KPFM data suggest that
the switching process is ultimately driven by the formation of a dipole
moment when water binds the terminal CO2H groups. Rectification
can also be triggered by a strong acid, which can, in turn, be controlled
with light or other inputs to produce devices with unique properties.
For example, the function of a diode-logic circuit would depend on
the outcomes of previous, proton-coupled events through the reversible
switching of individual circuit elements; the magnitudes of log|R| in this work are already sufficient to create diode-logic
circuits using EGaIn top-contacts.[5] There
are myriad ways of delivering and transporting protons, and because
the switching effect does not depend on the electrodes, proton-mediated
rectification-modulation can potentially be both fast and robust with
sufficient optimization in an appropriate device platform.
Authors: Manuel Souto; Li Yuan; Dayana C Morales; Li Jiang; Imma Ratera; Christian A Nijhuis; Jaume Veciana Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kim S Wimbush; Raluca M Fratila; Dandan Wang; Dongchen Qi; Cao Liang; Li Yuan; Nikolai Yakovlev; Kian Ping Loh; David N Reinhoudt; Aldrik H Velders; Christian A Nijhuis Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Sumit Kumar; Jochem T van Herpt; Régis Y N Gengler; Ben L Feringa; Petra Rudolf; Ryan C Chiechi Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sumit Kumar; Saurabh Soni; Wojciech Danowski; Isaac F Leach; Shirin Faraji; Ben L Feringa; Petra Rudolf; Ryan C Chiechi Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Sumit Kumar; Saurabh Soni; Wojciech Danowski; Carlijn L F van Beek; Ben L Feringa; Petra Rudolf; Ryan C Chiechi Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 15.419