Literature DB >> 30396864

Global longitudinal strain assessment by computed tomography in severe aortic stenosis patients - Feasibility using feature tracking analysis.

Miho Fukui1, Jeffrey Xu1, Islam Abdelkarim1, Michael S Sharbaugh1, Floyd W Thoma1, Andrew D Althouse1, Gianni Pedrizzetti2, João L Cavalcante3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) detects subclinical myocardial changes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Although GLS is typically measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), assessment by multiphasic gated computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become recently available. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of CTA-derived GLS assessment and compare its agreement with TTE using the same post-processing software in severe AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) evaluation.
METHODS: We evaluated patients with severe AS, sinus rhythm and adequate image quality for GLS analysis by both CTA and TTE pre-TAVR using 2D CT-Cardiac Performance Analysis prototype software (TomTec). The 18-segment model was used for GLS analysis by averaging the three long-axis views in both CTA and TTE studies. Agreement was assessed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 123 consecutive patients were included (mean age 84 ± 7 years, 45% female). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by CTA and TTE were similar 53 ± 14% for both. On average, CTA-derived GLS was greater than by TTE (-20 ± 6.5% vs. -16 ± 4.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between GLS assessed by CTA vs. TTE (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), although variability between imaging methods existed. The correlation between GLS and LVEF was strong (r = -0.90, p < 0.001 for CTA, r = -0.88, p < 0.001 for TTE) using the same imaging modality.
CONCLUSION: CTA-derived GLS assessment is feasible in selected patients with sinus rhythm and adequate image quality. The agreement of GLS between TTE and CTA is moderate but not interchangeable suggesting a potential modality-specific GLS threshold.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Computed tomography angiography; Global longitudinal strain; Left ventricular ejection fraction; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Transthoracic echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30396864     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  9 in total

1.  Improvements in global longitudinal strain after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to race.

Authors:  Aamir H Twing; Brody Slostad; Christina Anderson; Sreenivas Konda; Elliott M Groves; Mayank M Kansal
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Automated 4-dimensional regional myocardial strain evaluation using cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Zvi Peled; Yechiel Lamash; Shemy Carasso; Anath Fischer; Yoram Agmon; Diab Mutlak; Doron Aronson; Gil Bolotin; Jonathan Lessick
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Feasibility of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Left Ventricular Long-Axis Shortening as an Early Marker of Ventricular Dysfunction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Gilberto J Aquino; Josua A Decker; U Joseph Schoepf; Landin Carson; Namrata Paladugu; Basel Yacoub; Verena Brandt; Anna Lena Emrich; Florian Schwarz; Jeremy R Burt; Richard Bayer; Akos Varga-Szemes; Tilman Emrich
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 4.  The Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: 2020 Year in review.

Authors:  Todd C Villines; Subhi J Al'Aref; Daniele Andreini; Marcus Y Chen; Andrew D Choi; Carlo N De Cecco; Damini Dey; James P Earls; Maros Ferencik; Heidi Gransar; Harvey Hecht; Jonathon A Leipsic; Michael T Lu; Mohamed Marwan; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Edward Nicol; Gianluca Pontone; Jonathan Weir-McCall; Seamus P Whelton; Michelle C Williams; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Gudrun M Feuchtner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2021-02-22

5.  Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in bicupsid aortic valve patients: head-to-head comparison between computed tomography, 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Allard T van den Hoven; Sultan Yilmazer; Raluca G Chelu; Roderick W J van Grootel; Savine C S Minderhoud; Lidia R Bons; An M van Berendoncks; Anthonie L Duijnhouwer; Hans-Marc J Siebelink; Annemien E van den Bosch; Ricardo P J Budde; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Alexander Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Feasibility of CT-derived myocardial strain measurement in patients with advanced cardiac valve disease.

Authors:  Marius Vach; Johanna Vogelhuber; Marcel Weber; Alois M Sprinkart; Claus C Pieper; Wolfgang Block; Daniel Kuetting; Ulrike I Attenberger; Julian A Luetkens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Iodine-based extracellular volume for evaluating myocardial status in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction by using dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jing Liang; Hui Li; Jun Xie; Hongming Yu; Wenping Chen; Kejie Yin; Xingbiao Chen; Zhihong Sheng; Xin Zhang; Dan Mu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

Review 8.  Role of advanced left ventricular imaging in adults with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Andreea Calin; Anca D Mateescu; Andreea C Popescu; Rong Bing; Marc R Dweck; Bogdan A Popescu
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Assessment of Global Longitudinal and Circumferential Strain Using Computed Tomography Feature Tracking: Intra-Individual Comparison with CMR Feature Tracking and Myocardial Tagging in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Emilija Miskinyte; Paulius Bucius; Jennifer Erley; Seyedeh Mahsa Zamani; Radu Tanacli; Christian Stehning; Christopher Schneeweis; Tomas Lapinskas; Burkert Pieske; Volkmar Falk; Rolf Gebker; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Natalia Solowjowa; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.