Tabitha C Waite1, Lindsay Hamilton2, William O'Brien2. 1. Psychology Department, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA. Electronic address: waitet@bgsu.edu. 2. Psychology Department, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Research suggests Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) reduce negative outcomes in medical settings, but quantitative examinations of their effects on medical outcomes such as pain, anxiety, and distress are lacking. DESIGN: A comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis were conducted in which 22 studies (13 child, 9 adult) met inclusion criteria. Both intervention versus control and intervention pre-post effect sizes were computed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The overall intervention versus control effect size was large and significant (d = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.46-2.832). Similarly, the pre-post effect size was large and significant (d = 2.19, 95% CI = 0.74-3.64). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that AAI can yield large effects across a number of medically relevant outcomes. There is, however, substantial methodological variation across studies and more randomized clinical trials with stronger methodological controls are needed to establish the effectiveness of AAI compared to other interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Research suggests Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) reduce negative outcomes in medical settings, but quantitative examinations of their effects on medical outcomes such as pain, anxiety, and distress are lacking. DESIGN: A comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis were conducted in which 22 studies (13 child, 9 adult) met inclusion criteria. Both intervention versus control and intervention pre-post effect sizes were computed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The overall intervention versus control effect size was large and significant (d = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.46-2.832). Similarly, the pre-post effect size was large and significant (d = 2.19, 95% CI = 0.74-3.64). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that AAI can yield large effects across a number of medically relevant outcomes. There is, however, substantial methodological variation across studies and more randomized clinical trials with stronger methodological controls are needed to establish the effectiveness of AAI compared to other interventions.
Authors: Kathryn R Dalton; William Altekruse; Peter Campbell; Kathy Ruble; Karen C Carroll; Roland J Thorpe; Jacqueline Agnew; Meghan F Davis Journal: People Anim Date: 2022
Authors: Ben Carey; Colleen Anne Dell; James Stempien; Susan Tupper; Betty Rohr; Eloise Carr; Maria Cruz; Sharon Acoose; Peter Butt; Lindsey Broberg; Lisa Collard; Logan Fele-Slaferek; Cathie Fornssler; Donna Goodridge; Janet Gunderson; Holly McKenzie; Joe Rubin; Jason Shand; Jane Smith; Jason Trask; Kerry Ukrainetz; Simona Meier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Elisabeth Schramm; Christoph Breuninger; Rainer Wohlfarth; Moritz Elsaesser; Hannah Piosczyk; Thomas Fangmeier Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Kathryn R Dalton; Kathy Ruble; Laurel E Redding; Daniel O Morris; Noel T Mueller; Roland J Thorpe; Jacqueline Agnew; Karen C Carroll; Paul J Planet; Ronald C Rubenstein; Allen R Chen; Elizabeth A Grice; Meghan F Davis Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-05-13