| Literature DB >> 30392494 |
Priyanka Sajeev1, Biju Soman2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30392494 PMCID: PMC6204451 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Heart J ISSN: 0019-4832
Fig. 1Distribution of selected tribal settlements in Vithura Panchayat.
Socio demographic profile of the Kani tribe.
| VARIABLE | KANI TRIBE N = 298 (%) |
|---|---|
| Age group | |
| 25–34 yrs | 94 (31.5) |
| 35–44 yrs | 78 (26.2) |
| 45–54 yrs | 68 (22.8) |
| 55–64 yrs | 58 (19.5) |
| Marital Status | |
| Currently married | 129 (43.3) |
| Cohabitation | 104 (34.9) |
| Others | 65 (21.8) |
| Education | |
| No formal education | 39 (13.1) |
| Primary school | 76 (25.5) |
| High school | 149 (50.0) |
| Above High School level | 34 (11.4) |
| Socioeconomic status | |
| Below Poverty Line | 266 (89.3) |
| Above Poverty Line | 32 (10.7) |
| Context specific work status of Kani tribe | |
| Daily wage Labour | 88 (29.53) |
| Home makers | 75 (25.17) |
| Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act(MGNREGA) | 43 (14.4) |
| Trapping milk from the rubber trees (low paid job) | 22 (7.38) |
| Engaged in the free collection of goods (minor forest product collection) | 13 (4.36) |
| Eera works (Traditional handicrafts) | 4 (1.34) |
| Farmers | 12 (4.0) |
| Regular wage employee | 14 (4.7) |
| Others | 39 (13.1) |
Prevalence of NCD risk factors among Kani tribe.
| VARIABLE | PREVALENCE(N = 298) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertension(JNC 7 definition) | 144 (48.3%) | 40.3–56.0 |
| Overweight | 32 (10.7%) | 6.7–16.0 |
| Abdominal Obesity (Asian cut off) | 66 (22.1%) | 14.8–30.0 |
| Current Tobacco Use (Smoking forms) | 113 (37.9%) | 29.7–46.0 |
| Current Tobacco Use (Smokeless forms) | 226 (75.8%) | 68.1–83.0 |
| Current Tobacco Use (Any form) | 243 (81.5%) | 73.2–89.0 |
| Current Alcohol Use | 108 (36.2%) | 26.1–40.0 |
| Physical Activity | ||
| High (≥3000 METs) | 230 (77.2%) | 73.3–80.0 |
| Medium(600–2999.9 METs) | 39 (13.1%) | 9.3–17.0 |
| Low( <600 METs) | 29 (9.7%) | 5.0–16.0 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | ||
| Underweight (BMI <18.5) | 50 (16.8%) | 11.0–24.0 |
| Normal (BMI 18.5–24.9) | 216 (72.5%) | 65.3–79.0 |
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 30 (10.1%) | 7.1–14.0 |
| Obesity (BMI ≥30) | 2 (0.7%) | 0.1–2.0 |
95% CI −95% Confidence Interval adjusted for cluster sampling design using the survey package in R project.
Abdominal obesity is much higher among females (38.3%).
Current use of smoking form of tobacco use is much higher among males(69.1%).
Alcohol use is much higher among males(66.4%).
Association of Hypertension with demographic and behavioral parameters.
| Demographic and behavioral parameters (Number of subjects) | Crude Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio of final model (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age group | Up to mean age of 42yrs (163) | 1 | 1 |
| Mean age and older (135) | 4.57 (2.94–7.08)*** | 3.88 (2.48–6.06)*** | |
| Education | Up to High school level (115) | 1 | 1 |
| Above High school level (183) | 0.34 (0.36–0.45)*** | 0.50 (0.37–0.67)** | |
| Current alcohol consumption | Non-users (190) | 1 | 1 |
| Users (108) | 1.58 (0.95–2.62) | 1.91 (1.25–2.92)* | |
| Sex | Female (149) | 1 | – |
| Male (149) | 1.72 (1.35–2.181)** | ||
| Socioeconomic status | Below Poverty Line (266) | 1 | – |
| Above Poverty Line (32) | 0.61 (0.29–1.28) | ||
| Current users of smoking forms of tobacco | Non-users (185) | 1 | – |
| Users (113) | 1.92 (1.29–2.88)** | ||
| Current users of smokeless forms of tobacco | Non-users (72) | 1 | – |
| Users (226) | 1.66 (0.66–4.16) | ||
| Overweight | Body Mass Index <25 (266) | 1 | – |
| Body Mass Index ≥25 (32) | 1.42 (0.95–2.13) | ||
| Physical Activity Group | Low activity (29) | 1 | – |
| Medium activity (39) | 0.67 (0.25–1.82) | ||
| High activity (230) | 0.63 (0.33–1.18) |
‡ Adjusted Odds ratio was done using logistic regression analysis in the survey package in R project, which is adjusted for the cluster sampling design. Age group, sex, socioeconomic status, education level, current tobacco smoking, current alcohol intake, overweight and physical activity grouping were included in the original model, which were eliminated in a backward stepwise manner using Wald test. The Pseudo Restimation by the McFadden statistic of the model is 12.4%.