Literature DB >> 30389768

The Interior Surfaces of Wooden Barrels Are an Additional Microbial Inoculation Source for Lambic Beer Production.

J De Roos1, D Van der Veken1, L De Vuyst2.   

Abstract

Traditional lambic beer production takes place through wort inoculation with environmental air and fermentation and maturation in wooden barrels. These wooden casks or foeders are possible additional inoculation sources of microorganisms for lambic worts. To date, however, these lambic barrels have been examined only with culture-dependent techniques, thereby missing a portion of the microorganisms present. Moreover, the effects of the cleaning procedures (involving high-pressure water and/or fumigation) and the barrel type on the microbial community structures of the interior surfaces of wooden lambic barrels were unclear. The culture-dependent plating and culture-independent amplicon sequencing of swab samples obtained from the interior surfaces of different wooden casks and foeders used for traditional lambic beer production in Belgium revealed that the microbial compositions of these surfaces differed statistically throughout the barrel-cleaning procedures applied. At the end of the cleaning procedures, amplicon sequencing still detected fermentation- and maturation-related microorganisms, although only a few colonies were still detectable using culture-dependent methods. It is possible that some of the surviving microorganisms were missed due to the presence of many of these cells in a viable but not culturable state and/or engrained deeper in the wood. These surviving microorganisms could act as an additional inoculation source, besides brewery air and brewery equipment, thereby helping to establish a stable microbial community in the wort to diminish batch-to-batch variations in fermentation profiles. Furthermore, the microbial compositions of the interior barrel surfaces differed statistically based on the barrel type, possibly reflecting different characteristics of the lambic barrels in terms of age, wood thickness, and wood porosity.IMPORTANCE Although the coolship step is generally regarded as the main contributor to the spontaneous inoculation by environmental air of fresh worts for lambic beer production, it is known that microorganisms often associate with specific surfaces present in a brewery. However, knowledge about the association of microorganisms with the interior surfaces of wooden lambic barrels is limited. To clarify the role of casks and foeders as additional microbial inoculation sources, it was important to determine the influence of the barrel characteristics and the cleaning procedures on the microbial communities of the interior barrel surfaces. Moreover, this helped to elucidate the complex spontaneous lambic beer fermentation and maturation process. It will allow further optimization of the lambic beer production process, as well as the wooden-barrel-cleaning procedures applied.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplicon sequencing; bacteria; culture-independent analysis; lambic beer; wooden barrels; yeasts

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30389768      PMCID: PMC6293109          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02226-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Facility-specific "house" microbiome drives microbial landscapes of artisan cheesemaking plants.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; David A Mills
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The microbial diversity of an industrially produced lambic beer shares members of a traditionally produced one and reveals a core microbiota for lambic beer fermentation.

Authors:  Freek Spitaels; Anneleen D Wieme; Maarten Janssens; Maarten Aerts; Anita Van Landschoot; Luc De Vuyst; Peter Vandamme
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.516

5.  Survival patterns of Dekkera bruxellensis in wines and inhibitory effect of sulphur dioxide.

Authors:  A Barata; J Caldeira; R Botelheiro; D Pagliara; M Malfeito-Ferreira; V Loureiro
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Comparative genome analysis of Pediococcus damnosus LMG 28219, a strain well-adapted to the beer environment.

Authors:  Isabel Snauwaert; Pieter Stragier; Luc De Vuyst; Peter Vandamme
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Mapping microbial ecosystems and spoilage-gene flow in breweries highlights patterns of contamination and resistance.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; Jordyn Bergsveinson; Barry Ziola; David A Mills
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Revisiting the Cellulosimicrobium cellulans yeast-lytic beta-1,3-glucanases toolbox: a review.

Authors:  Pau Ferrer
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  The microbial diversity of traditional spontaneously fermented lambic beer.

Authors:  Freek Spitaels; Anneleen D Wieme; Maarten Janssens; Maarten Aerts; Heide-Marie Daniel; Anita Van Landschoot; Luc De Vuyst; Peter Vandamme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Microbial Dynamics in Traditional and Modern Sour Beer Production.

Authors:  Anna Dysvik; Sabina Leanti La Rosa; Gert De Rouck; Elling-Olav Rukke; Bjørge Westereng; Trude Wicklund
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Technological and Environmental Features Determine the Uniqueness of the Lambic Beer Microbiota and Production Process.

Authors:  Dries Bongaerts; Jonas De Roos; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Wort Substrate Consumption and Metabolite Production During Lambic Beer Fermentation and Maturation Explain the Successive Growth of Specific Bacterial and Yeast Species.

Authors:  Jonas De Roos; Peter Vandamme; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Acetic Acid Bacteria in Sour Beer Production: Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Arne Bouchez; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.