Literature DB >> 30388210

Surgical smoke: still an underestimated health hazard in the operating theatre.

Gregor J Kocher1, Sergio B Sesia1, Felipe Lopez-Hilfiker2, Ralph A Schmid1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Smoke generated from electrocautery dissection contains irritating and/or carcinogenic components. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a mobile smoke evacuation system (SES) in protecting surgical personnel from these hazardous fumes.
METHODS: Standardized cuts with an electrocautery device were performed on fresh porcine tissue, and the generated surgical fume was analysed with and without the additional use of a mobile SES using a real-time proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Furthermore, 2 different surgical masks were tested to investigate their filter capacity.
RESULTS: Several toxic and/or carcinogenic volatile organic compounds including 1,3-butadiene, benzene and furfural were found in concentrations clearly above the limits that were set by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health: 1,3-butadiene at 19.06 ± 1.54 ppm (limit: 5 ppm), benzene at 6.21 ± 1.33 ppm (limit: 0.5 ppm) and furfural at 14.34 ± 2.97 ppm (limit: 2 ppm). Although the mobile SES was able to reduce these substances to a certain degree, butadiene and benzene still remained above the permissible exposure limits with concentrations of 14.21 ± 0.07 and 1.16 ± 0.05, respectively. Both surgical masks were unable to reduce the 'inhaled' concentrations of volatile organic compounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the SES reduced the concentrations of most of the detected volatile organic compounds to a certain amount, especially the carcinogenic substances, butadiene and benzene remained high above exposure limits. According to the abovementioned significant data, further investigation on this topic is imperative, especially when considering that surgical masks were absolutely ineffective in protecting individuals from the toxic smoke and that the cautery was only used for 10 s in this experiment.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benzene ; Electrocautery ; Furfural ; Mass spectrometer; Plume ; Smoke

Year:  2019        PMID: 30388210     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  1,3-Butadiene: a ubiquitous environmental mutagen and its associations with diseases.

Authors:  Wan-Qi Chen; Xin-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 3.  Impact of Surgical Smoke on the Surgical Team and Operating Room Nurses and Its Reduction Strategies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amirmohammad Merajikhah; Behzad Imani; Salman Khazaei; Hamid Bouraghi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Surgical smoke: modern mobile smoke evacuation systems improve occupational safety in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Konstantinos Gioutsos; Thanh-Long Nguyen; Ulrich Biber; Markus D Enderle; Abigail Koss; Gregor J Kocher
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  A novel aerosolisation mitigation device for endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Jaime Viera-Artiles; David Mato; José J Valdiande; David Lobo; Juan Pedraja; José M López-Higuera; Javier Ospina
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Gregor J Kocher; Abigail R Koss; Michael Groessl; Joerg C Schefold; Markus M Luedi; Christopher Quapp; Patrick Dorn; Jon Lutz; Luca Cappellin; Manuel Hutterli; Felipe D Lopez-Hilfiker; Mohammad Al-Hurani; Sergio B Sesia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.