BACKGROUND: Detecting asymptomatic and undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly important. Recently, we developed a wristwatch-based pulse wave monitor (PWM; Seiko Epson, Japan) capable of long-term recording, with an automatic diagnosis algorithm that uses frequency-based pulse wave analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of continuous pulse wave monitoring for detection of AF. METHODS: During the electrophysiological study (EPS) in patients with AF, simultaneous pulse wave monitoring and Holter electrocardiograms (ECG) were recorded (n = 136, mean age 62.7 ± 10.9 years). The diagnostic accuracy of the PWM for AF was compared to the Holter ECG diagnosis. Standard performance metrics (sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated. The duration-based measurements were based on the diagnosis concordance ratios for the duration of time between diagnosis detected by the PWM and true diagnosis by the Holter ECG (AF or not AF). The episode-based performance metrics were based on the proportion of episodes appropriately detected with the PWM relative to episodes determined by the Holter ECG. RESULTS: The total recording time was 1,542,770 s (AF: 270,945 s). A high diagnostic Sp (patient average: 96.4%, cumulative: 97.7%) and NPV (patient average: 95.1%, cumulative: 96.8%) were obtained in the duration-based results. In the episode-based metrics, all indices significantly improved with longer AF episode durations. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous pulse wave monitoring can provide accurate and dependable information to aid in AF diagnosis. A high validity in confirming freedom from AF was shown by a high NPV.
BACKGROUND: Detecting asymptomatic and undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly important. Recently, we developed a wristwatch-based pulse wave monitor (PWM; Seiko Epson, Japan) capable of long-term recording, with an automatic diagnosis algorithm that uses frequency-based pulse wave analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of continuous pulse wave monitoring for detection of AF. METHODS: During the electrophysiological study (EPS) in patients with AF, simultaneous pulse wave monitoring and Holter electrocardiograms (ECG) were recorded (n = 136, mean age 62.7 ± 10.9 years). The diagnostic accuracy of the PWM for AF was compared to the Holter ECG diagnosis. Standard performance metrics (sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated. The duration-based measurements were based on the diagnosis concordance ratios for the duration of time between diagnosis detected by the PWM and true diagnosis by the Holter ECG (AF or not AF). The episode-based performance metrics were based on the proportion of episodes appropriately detected with the PWM relative to episodes determined by the Holter ECG. RESULTS: The total recording time was 1,542,770 s (AF: 270,945 s). A high diagnostic Sp (patient average: 96.4%, cumulative: 97.7%) and NPV (patient average: 95.1%, cumulative: 96.8%) were obtained in the duration-based results. In the episode-based metrics, all indices significantly improved with longer AF episode durations. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous pulse wave monitoring can provide accurate and dependable information to aid in AF diagnosis. A high validity in confirming freedom from AF was shown by a high NPV.
Authors: I Kishimoto; H Makino; Y Ohata; T Tamanaha; M Tochiya; K Kusano; T Anzai; K Toyoda; S Yasuda; K Minematsu; H Ogawa Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Jeff S Healey; Stuart J Connolly; Michael R Gold; Carsten W Israel; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Alessandro Capucci; C P Lau; Eric Fain; Sean Yang; Christophe Bailleul; Carlos A Morillo; Mark Carlson; Ellison Themeles; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Stefan H Hohnloser Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven Swiryn; Michael V Orlov; David G Benditt; John P DiMarco; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Edward Karst; Fujian Qu; Mara T Slawsky; Melanie Turkel; Albert L Waldo Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Giuseppe Boriani; Taya V Glotzer; Massimo Santini; Teena M West; Mirko De Melis; Milan Sepsi; Maurizio Gasparini; Thorsten Lewalter; John A Camm; Daniel E Singer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Tijn Hendrikx; Martin Sundqvist; Herbert Sandström; Carin Sahlin; Morteza Rohani; Faris Al-Khalili; Rolf Hörnsten; Anders Blomberg; Per Wester; Mårten Rosenqvist; Karl A Franklin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eemu-Samuli Väliaho; Jukka A Lipponen; Pekka Kuoppa; Tero J Martikainen; Helena Jäntti; Tuomas T Rissanen; Maaret Castrén; Jari Halonen; Mika P Tarvainen; Tiina M Laitinen; Tomi P Laitinen; Onni E Santala; Olli Rantula; Noora S Naukkarinen; Juha E K Hartikainen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 4.566