Literature DB >> 30386487

Using Appreciative Inquiry to Inform Program Evaluation in Graduate Medical Education.

Jennifer A Rama, Carla Falco, Dorene F Balmer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graduate medical education programs are expected to conduct an annual program evaluation. While general guidelines exist, innovative and feasible approaches to program evaluations may help efforts at program improvement. Appreciative Inquiry is an approach that focuses on successful moments, effective processes, and programs' strengths.
OBJECTIVE: We implemented a novel application of Appreciative Inquiry and its 4 phases (Inquire, Imagine, Innovate, and Implement) and demonstrate how it led to meaningful improvements in a pediatric pulmonology fellowship program.
METHODS: As part of the Inquire and Imagine phases, the authors developed an interview guide that aligned with Appreciative Inquiry concepts. Two faculty members conducted semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of 11 of 14 fellowship alumni. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and reviewed. A summary of the findings was presented to the Program Evaluation Committee, which then directed the Innovate and Implement phases.
RESULTS: Appreciative Inquiry was acceptable to the alumni and feasible with the authors' self-directed learning approach and minimal administrative and financial support. In the Inquire phase, alumni identified program strengths and successes. In the Imagine phase, alumni identified program changes that could aid transition to independent practice for future fellows (an identified program goal). Based on the results of the Appreciative Inquiry, program leadership and the Program Evaluation Committee selected improvements for implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: For small programs, Appreciative Inquiry is an innovative and feasible approach to program evaluation that facilitates actionable program improvement recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30386487      PMCID: PMC6194888          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00043.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  13 in total

Review 1.  Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.

Authors:  Ann W Frye; Paul A Hemmer
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs.

Authors:  David A Cook
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  The Program Self-Study and the 10-Year Site Visit: Rationale for a New Approach.

Authors:  Ingrid Philibert; Thomas J Nasca
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

4.  What students learn about professionalism from faculty stories: an "appreciative inquiry" approach.

Authors:  Jennifer L Quaintance; Louise Arnold; George S Thompson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Enhancing the informal curriculum of a medical school: a case study in organizational culture change.

Authors:  Ann H Cottingham; Anthony L Suchman; Debra K Litzelman; Richard M Frankel; David L Mossbarger; Penelope R Williamson; Dewitt C Baldwin; Thomas S Inui
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Using Data From Program Evaluations for Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Dorene F Balmer; Jennifer A Rama; Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis; Terese Stenfors-Hayes
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-12

7.  Improving the Improvement Process: 5 Dimensions of Effective Program Evaluation and Improvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Philibert; John H Beernink; Barbara H Bush; Donna A Caniano; John J Coyle; Joseph Gilhooly; Donald E Kraybill; David Larson; Mary Catherine Nace; William W Robertson; Judith D Rubin; Theodore Sanford; Andrea Chow; Sarah Moran
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-02

8.  Appreciative Inquiry for quality improvement in primary care practices.

Authors:  Mary C Ruhe; Sarah N Bobiak; David Litaker; Caroline A Carter; Laura Wu; Casey Schroeder; Stephen J Zyzanski; Sharon M Weyer; James J Werner; Ronald E Fry; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.926

9.  "Back to Bedside": Residents' and Fellows' Perspectives on Finding Meaning in Work.

Authors:  Dustin M Hipp; Kristy L Rialon; Kathryn Nevel; Anai N Kothari; Lcdr Dinchen A Jardine
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-04

Review 10.  Thou shalt not tweet unprofessionally: an appreciative inquiry into the professional use of social media.

Authors:  Ian Pereira; Anne Marie Cunningham; Katherine Moreau; Jonathan Sherbino; Alireza Jalali
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.401

View more
  1 in total

1.  Getting the Evaluation Focus Clear: A Shared Understanding of What Is Being Evaluated.

Authors:  Janet M Riddle; Amy Halverson; Michelle Barnes
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.