Literature DB >> 30385649

Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes.

Rachel L Denlinger-Apte1, Jennifer W Tidey1,2, Joseph S Koopmeiners3, Dorothy K Hatsukami4, Tracy T Smith5, Lauren R Pacek6, F Joseph McClernon6, Eric C Donny7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making for reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to a minimally addictive level. Very little is known about whether use of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes affects support for a nicotine reduction policy.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of using VLNC versus usual brand (UB) cigarettes on support for a nicotine reduction policy and determined whether participant characteristics and responses to VLNC cigarettes were associated with policy support.
METHODS: Participants from a cigarette trial who were assigned to either 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco research cigarettes or their UB for 6 weeks were asked about their support for the policy. χ2 tests were used to compare support for the policy between cigarette conditions and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess covariates associated with policy support.
FINDINGS: Policy support did not differ by condition. After 6 weeks of using VLNC cigarettes, 50% of participants supported the policy, 26% opposed and 24% responded 'Don't Know'. Support was higher among those adherent to smoking only VLNC cigarettes (65%) compared with those who were non-adherent (44%). Older participants and those interested in quitting had increased odds of support. Cigarette satisfaction, perceived harm and perceived nicotine content were not significantly associated with support.
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking VLNC cigarettes did not affect support for a nicotine reduction policy. Understanding predictors of policy support and opposition will help public health officials to maximise the public health acceptance and impact of this policy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681875 Post-Results). © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  harm reduction; nicotine; public policy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30385649      PMCID: PMC6482068          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  25 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Rachel L Denlinger; Jennifer W Tidey; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Ryan G Vandrey; Mustafa al'Absi; Steven G Carmella; Paul M Cinciripini; Sarah S Dermody; David J Drobes; Stephen S Hecht; Joni Jensen; Tonya Lane; Chap T Le; F Joseph McClernon; Ivan D Montoya; Sharon E Murphy; Jason D Robinson; Maxine L Stitzer; Andrew A Strasser; Hilary Tindle; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Confirmatory factor analyses and reliability of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire.

Authors:  Joseph C Cappelleri; Andrew G Bushmakin; Christine L Baker; Elizabeth Merikle; Abayomi O Olufade; David G Gilbert
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  A Nicotine-Focused Framework for Public Health.

Authors:  Scott Gottlieb; Mitchell Zeller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Perceived Health Risks of Snus and Medicinal Nicotine Products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; R I Vogel; Herb H Severson; Joni A Jensen; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

7.  Whether to push or pull? Nicotine reduction and non-combusted alternatives - Two strategies for reducing smoking and improving public health.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Suzanne M Colby; F Joseph McClernon; Andrew A Strasser; Jennifer W Tidey; Cassidy M White; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Attitudes towards Potential New Tobacco Control Regulations among U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Allison M Schmidt; Sarah D Kowitt; Allison E Myers; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Nicotine and Anatabine Exposure from Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Authors:  Rachel L Denlinger; Tracy T Smith; Sharon E Murphy; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Lauren R Pacek; Cirielle Colino; Samantha N Cwalina; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-04

Review 10.  Reducing the nicotine content to make cigarettes less addictive.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Jack E Henningfield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  4 in total

1.  Responses to reduced nicotine cigarette marketing features: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Sasha Rogelberg; Anupreet K Sidhu; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Perceptions of Nicotine Reduction Policy in the United States: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Katherine C Henderson; Emily E Loud; Hue Trong Duong; Reed M Reynolds; Bo Yang; Charity A Ntansah; David L Ashley; James F Thrasher; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 5.825

3.  Which tobacco control policies do smokers support? Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Georges J Nahhas; Ron Borland; Yoo Jin Cho; Janet Chung-Hall; Robert T Fairman; Geoffrey T Fong; Ann McNeill; Lucy Popova; James F Thrasher; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.637

4.  "I actually finally feel like the cigarettes aren't controlling me." - Interviews with participants smoking very low nicotine content cigarettes during a residential study.

Authors:  Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Cassidy M White; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Matthew J Carpenter; Tracy T Smith
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 4.492

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.