Literature DB >> 30384809

Comparison of Performance of Different Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Parameters for Outcome Prediction in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.

Frederick A Zeiler1,2,3, Ari Ercole1, Manuel Cabeleira4, Marco Carbonara5, Nino Stocchetti5,6, David K Menon1, Peter Smielewski4, Marek Czosnyka4,7.   

Abstract

It has been postulated previously that individualized cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets can be derived from cerebrovascular reactivity indices. Differences between real CPP and target CPP (named generically optimal CPP) has been linked to global outcome in adult traumatic brain injury (TBI). Different vascular reactivity indices can be utilized in the determination. The goal of this study is to evaluate CPPopt parameters, derived from three intracranial pressure (ICP)-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices, and determine which one is superior for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction. Using the prospectively collected data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, the following indices of cerebrovascular reactivity were derived: pressure reactivity index (PRx; correlation between ICP and mean arterial pressure [MAP]), pulse amplitude index (PAx; correlation between pulse amplitude of ICP [AMP] and MAP), and RAC (correlation between AMP and CPP). CPPopt was derived using each index. Univariate logistic regression models were created to assess the association between CPPopt with global dichotomized outcome at 6 to 12 months, as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended. Models were compared via area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Delong's Test. A total of 204 patients had available data. CPPopt derived from PRx, PAx, and RAC performed variably in their association with outcomes. PRx- and RAC-based CPPopt performed similarly, with RAC parameters trending towards highest AUC values. PAx-based CPPopt parameters failed to reach significant associations with dichotomized outcomes at 6 to 12 months. CPPopt parameters derived from PRx and RAC appear similar in their overall ability for 6- to 12-month outcome prediction in moderate/severe adult TBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPP optimum; ICP indices; autoregulation; outcome analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30384809     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  23 in total

1.  Diffuse Intracranial Injury Patterns Are Associated with Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Validation Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; François Mathieu; Miguel Monteiro; Ben Glocker; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Nino Stocchetti; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Virginia Newcombe; David K Menon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Cerebrovascular Consequences of Elevated Intracranial Pressure After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Leanne Alexis Calviello; Frederick A Zeiler; Joseph Donnelly; András Czigler; Andrea Lavinio; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

3.  Hyperemia in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients is associated with an increased risk of seizures.

Authors:  Ayham Alkhachroum; Murad Megjhani; Kalijah Terilli; Clio Rubinos; Jenna Ford; Brendan K Wallace; David J Roh; Sachin Agarwal; E Sander Connolly; Amelia K Boehme; Jan Claassen; Soojin Park
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  The leap to ordinal: Detailed functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury with a flexible modelling approach.

Authors:  Shubhayu Bhattacharyay; Ioan Milosevic; Lindsay Wilson; David K Menon; Robert D Stevens; Ewout W Steyerberg; David W Nelson; Ari Ercole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  The Limited Impact of Current Therapeutic Interventions on Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Overview.

Authors:  Logan Froese; Carleen Batson; Alwyn Gomez; Josh Dian; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Multimodal Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation and Autonomic Function After Pediatric Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Rupture.

Authors:  Brian Appavu; Stephen Foldes; Brian T Burrows; Austin Jacobson; Todd Abruzzo; Varina Boerwinkle; Anthony Willyerd; Tara Mangum; Vishal Gunnala; Iris Marku; P D Adelson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Statistical Cerebrovascular Reactivity Signal Properties after Secondary Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Pilot Analysis.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Marcel Aries; Manuel Cabeleira; Thomas A van Essen; Nino Stocchetti; David K Menon; Ivan Timofeev; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Peter Hutchinson; Ari Ercole
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Monitoring in the Management of Adult Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Delphi Consensus of Clinicians.

Authors:  B Depreitere; G Citerio; M Smith; P David Adelson; M J Aries; T P Bleck; P Bouzat; R Chesnut; V De Sloovere; M Diringer; J Dureanteau; A Ercole; G Hawryluk; C Hawthorne; R Helbok; S P Klein; J O Neumann; C Robba; L Steiner; N Stocchetti; F S Taccone; A Valadka; S Wolf; F A Zeiler; G Meyfroidt
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  "Take a Number"-Precision Monitoring Directs Precision Therapy.

Authors:  Patrick M Kochanek; Ruchira M Jha; Robert S B Clark
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Cerebrovascular Response to Phenylephrine in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature.

Authors:  Logan Froese; Joshua Dian; Alwyn Gomez; Bertram Unger; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2020-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.