Literature DB >> 30383189

How Gender Stereotypes May Limit Female Faculty Advancement in Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Nicole Rogus-Pulia1,2,3,4, Ianessa Humbert5,6,7, Christine Kolehmainen1,4, Molly Carnes1,4,8,9,10.   

Abstract

Purpose: The field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) faces a critical shortage of the faculty essential to train the future workforce of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. Despite a predominance of women in the field, men receive doctoral degrees, tenure status, academic leadership positions, and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association awards at disproportionately higher rates than women. The purpose of this review is to explore how implicit gender bias may contribute to female faculty advancement, including current and projected faculty workforce shortages, and to propose tangible solutions. Method: The authors present proportions of men and women who receive doctoral degrees, advance to each faculty rank, receive tenure status, hold department chairs in CSD, and receive American Speech-Language-Hearing Association honors and awards. They review ways in which cultural stereotypes give rise to implicit gender bias and discuss myriad ways that implicit gender bias may influence the decisions of students considering an academic career in CSD and their career trajectories. Conclusions: Cultural stereotypes about men and women lead to implicit gender bias that may have real consequences for female faculty advancement in CSD. Such implicit bias can influence career selection and outcomes within the field in multiple ways. To ensure that CSD continues to attract top talent and maintain a robust pipeline of future faculty in doctoral training programs, the field must recognize the existence of implicit gender bias and implement evidence-based strategies to minimize its potentially damaging effects on the future of the profession.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30383189      PMCID: PMC6436457          DOI: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  48 in total

1.  Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders.

Authors:  Robert W Livingston; Ashleigh Shelby Rosette; Ella F Washington
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-14

2.  Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition.

Authors:  Elisabeth D Martinez; Jeannine Botos; Kathleen M Dohoney; Theresa M Geiman; Sarah S Kolla; Ana Olivera; Yi Qiu; Geetha Vani Rayasam; Diana A Stavreva; Orna Cohen-Fix
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Negotiating gender roles: gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others.

Authors:  Emily T Amanatullah; Michael W Morris
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Michael Johns; Chad Forbes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Barbara Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Stuck in the out-group: Jennifer can't grow up, Jane's invisible, and Janet's over the hill.

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men.

Authors:  Alice H Eagly; Mary C Johannesen-Schmidt; Marloes L van Engen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers.

Authors:  Emilio J Castilla
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2008-05

9.  Patterns of Feedback on the Bridge to Independence: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of NIH Mentored Career Development Award Application Critiques.

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; Melissa Dattalo; Caitlin Regner; Amarette Filut; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 10.  Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Chapman; Anna Kaatz; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Developing, Implementing, and Learning from a Student-Led Initiative to Support Minority Students in Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Authors:  Teresa M Girolamo; Samantha Ghali
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-07-20

2.  State of the Practice of Team Science in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology.

Authors:  Carla Wood; Mollie Romano; Yulia A Levites Strekalova; Victor A Lugo; Wayne T McCormack
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Preliminary Evaluation of Applicants to Master's Programs in Speech-Language Pathology Using Vignettes and Criteria From a Holistic Review Process.

Authors:  Teresa M Girolamo; Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Samantha Ghali; Brittany Theresa Williams
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.018

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.