Literature DB >> 19044141

Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers.

Emilio J Castilla1.   

Abstract

This study helps to fill a significant gap in the literature on organizations and inequality by investigating the central role of merit-based reward systems in shaping gender and racial disparities in wages and promotions. The author develops and tests a set of propositions isolating processes of performance-reward bias, whereby women and minorities receive less compensation than white men with equal scores on performance evaluations. Using personnel data from a large service organization, the author empirically establishes the existence of this bias and shows that gender, race, and nationality differences continue to affect salary growth after performance ratings are taken into account, ceteris paribus. This finding demonstrates a critical challenge faced by the many contemporary employers who adopt merit-based practices and policies. Although these policies are often adopted in the hope of motivating employees and ensuring meritocracy, policies with limited transparency and accountability can actually increase ascriptive bias and reduce equity in the workplace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19044141     DOI: 10.1086/588738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJS        ISSN: 0002-9602


  12 in total

1.  The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.

Authors:  Devah Pager; Hana Shepherd
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.

Authors:  Wairimu Magua; Xiaojin Zhu; Anupama Bhattacharya; Amarette Filut; Aaron Potvien; Renee Leatherberry; You-Geon Lee; Madeline Jens; Dastagiri Malikireddy; Molly Carnes; Anna Kaatz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt? Performance Evaluations, Medical Errors, and the Production of Gender Inequality in Emergency Medical Education.

Authors:  Alexandra Brewer; Melissa Osborne; Anna S Mueller; Daniel M O'Connor; Arjun Dayal; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2020-03-03

5.  Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint.

Authors:  David S Pedulla; Sarah Thébaud
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2015-02

6.  Discrimination Toward Physicians of Color: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amarette Filut; Madelyn Alvarez; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 7.  How Gender Stereotypes May Limit Female Faculty Advancement in Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Ianessa Humbert; Christine Kolehmainen; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Instructional Communities of Practice during COVID-19: Social Networks and Their Implications for Resilience.

Authors:  Daniel Z Grunspan; Emily A Holt; Susan M Keenan
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  The effects of skin tone, height, and gender on earnings.

Authors:  Srikant Devaraj; Narda R Quigley; Pankaj C Patel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Good Things for Those Who Wait: Predictive Modeling Highlights Importance of Delay Discounting for Income Attainment.

Authors:  William H Hampton; Nima Asadi; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.