Literature DB >> 30383128

Assessment of Reported Trial Characteristics, Rate of Publication, and Inclusion of Mandatory Biopsies of Research Biopsies in Clinical Trials in Oncology.

Christine M Parseghian1, Alda L Tam2, James Yao1, Joe Ensor3, Lee M Ellis4, Kanwal Raghav1, Michael J Overman1.   

Abstract

Importance: Research biopsies are frequently incorporated within clinical trials in oncology and are often a mandatory requirement for trial enrollment. However, limited information is available regarding the extent and completeness of research biopsy reporting.
Objectives: To determine the rate of research biopsy reporting for clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and determine the clinical trial factors that correlated with research biopsy reporting. Design, Setting, and Participants: ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) was searched for all oncologic therapeutic clinical trials with completion dates between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2015, with end point category terms including biopsy, biopsies, or tissue. The date of the final publication search was March 12, 2018. Trials conducting only diagnostic biopsies or trials using bone marrow biopsies or liquid biopsies were excluded. Credit for biopsy reporting was given for any mention of performing or results from tissue biopsies in publications. Clinical trials were compared with the highest level of corresponding publication or registry report. Fisher exact test was used for analysis.
Results: A total of 301 clinical trials were identified, with a median of 37 patients (range, 1-1310 patients) enrolled per trial. After a median follow-up time of 5.8 years from trial completion, 244 of 301 trials (81.1%) reported results: publications in 195 (64.8%) and CTG registry in 49 (16.3%). Reporting of trial results was associated with later-stage trials (phase 2/3) (137 of 153 [89.5%] for phase 2/3 vs 107 of 148 [72.3%] for phase 1 or 1/2 trials; P < .001). Results from research biopsies were reported in 153 of 301 (50.8%) trials or in 153 of 244 (62.7%) trials with published results. Rates varied by type of presentation: 142 of 195 publications (72.8%) vs 11 of 49 CTG reports (22.4%) (P < .001). Conducting mandatory biopsies (82.1% [101 of 123] vs 43.0% [52 of 121]; P < .001), early-phase clinical trials (70.1% [75 of 107] vs 56.9% [78 of 137]; P = .03), and listing the biopsy as a primary objective in CTG (76.3% [45 of 59] vs 58.4% [108 of 185]; P = .01) was associated with improved biopsy reporting. Trials that met their primary end point (71.9% [115 of 160] vs 45.2% [38 of 84]; P < .001) and those published in higher-impact journals (81.1% [77 of 95] vs 65.0% [65 of 100]; P = .01) had improved biopsy reporting. Mandatory biopsies and biopsy reporting increased over time with similar slopes (P = .58). Conclusions and Relevance: Despite ethical obligations to report research biopsies, only 50.8% of all trials that included a research biopsy-related end point in CTG reported on these biopsy-related results. Improved efforts are needed to report results obtained from research biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30383128      PMCID: PMC6439840          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  12 in total

1.  Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting.

Authors:  Monika K Krzyzanowska; Melania Pintilie; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication.

Authors:  C De Bellefeuille; C A Morrison; I F Tannock
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Presentation and subsequent publication rates of phase I oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Luis H Camacho; Jennifer Bacik; Alexander Cheung; David R Spriggs
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Trends in the use and role of biomarkers in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Bernardo H L Goulart; Jeffrey W Clark; Homer H Pien; Thomas G Roberts; Stan N Finkelstein; Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Publication outcomes of phase II oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Rasmus T Hoeg; Jennifer A Lee; Michelle A Mathiason; Kristina Rokkones; Stephanie L Serck; Kaye L Crampton; Ann E Emmel; Eileen A Severson; Ronald S Go
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Biomarkers in early clinical trials: the committed and the skeptics.

Authors:  Udai Banerji; Johann de Bono; Ian Judson; Stanley Kaye; Paul Workman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Time to publication among completed clinical trials.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Marian Mocanu; Julianna F Lampropulos; Tony Tse; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Underreporting of Research Biopsies from Clinical Trials in Oncology.

Authors:  Christine M Parseghian; Kanwal Raghav; Robert A Wolff; Joe Ensor; James Yao; Lee M Ellis; Alda L Tam; Michael J Overman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed?

Authors:  Michael J Overman; Janhavi Modak; Scott Kopetz; Ravi Murthy; James C Yao; Marshall E Hicks; James L Abbruzzese; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Assessing the Eventual Publication of Clinical Trial Abstracts Submitted to a Large Annual Oncology Meeting.

Authors:  Paul R Massey; Ruibin Wang; Vinay Prasad; Susan E Bates; Tito Fojo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-17
View more
  5 in total

1.  Increasing Numbers and Reported Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Inpatient Lung Biopsies: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell S von Itzstein; Arjun Gupta; Kristin C Mara; Sahil Khanna; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  The use of research biopsies in oncology trials: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Katherine V Ferry-Galow; Alice P Chen
Journal:  J Hosp Manag Health Policy       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 3.  Prognostic/predictive markers in systemic therapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Evthokia A Hobbs; Natalie Chen; Alphi Kuriakose; Elizabeth Bonefas; Bora Lim
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.485

4.  Analyses of the Rationale and Implementation of Research Biopsies in Oncology Clinical Trials at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Nathalie Olympios; Laetitia Collet; Marianne Paesmans; Christiane Jungels; Nuria Kotecki; Ahmad Awada; Philippe Aftimos
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-04

5.  Practical consideration for successful sequential tumor biopsies in first-in-human trials.

Authors:  Takafumi Koyama; Toshio Shimizu; Jun Sato; Yuki Katsuya; Satoru Iwasa; Shunsuke Kondo; Tatsuya Yoshida; Kazuki Sudo; Makoto Nishino; Yuichi Takiguchi; Kan Yonemori; Noboru Yamamoto
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.651

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.