Literature DB >> 30382308

Restricted fluid resuscitation in suspected sepsis associated hypotension (REFRESH): a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Stephen P J Macdonald1,2,3, Gerben Keijzers4,5,6, David McD Taylor7,8, Frances Kinnear9, Glenn Arendts10,11,12, Daniel M Fatovich10,11,13, Rinaldo Bellomo14, David McCutcheon10,11,13,15, John F Fraser16, Juan-Carlos Ascencio-Lane17, Sally Burrows11, Edward Litton18, Amanda Harley4, Matthew Anstey19, Ashes Mukherjee15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if a regimen of restricted fluids and early vasopressor compared to usual care is feasible for initial resuscitation of hypotension due to suspected sepsis.
METHODS: A prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial of a restricted fluid resuscitation regimen in the first 6 h among patients in the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure under 100 mmHg, after minimum 1000 ml of IV fluid. Primary outcome was total fluid administered within 6 h post randomisation.
RESULTS: There were 99 participants (50 restricted volume and 49 usual care) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median volume from presentation to 6 h in the restricted volume group was 2387 ml [first to third quartile (Q1-Q3) 1750-2750 ml]; 30 ml/kg (Q1-Q3 32-39 ml/kg) vs. 3000 ml (Q1-Q3 2250-3900 ml); 43 ml/kg (Q1-Q3 35-50 ml/kg) in the usual care group (p < 0.001). Median duration of vasopressor support was 21 h (Q1-Q3 9-42 h) vs. 33 h (Q1-Q3 15-50 h), (p = 0.13) in the restricted volume and usual care groups, respectively. At 90-days, 4 of 48 (8%) in the restricted volume group and 3 of 47 (6%) in the usual care group had died. Protocol deviations occurred in 6/50 (12%) in restricted group and 11/49 (22%) in the usual care group, and serious adverse events in four cases (8%) in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of restricted fluids and early vasopressor in ED patients with suspected sepsis and hypotension appears feasible. Illness severity was moderate and mortality rates low. A future trial is necessary with recruitment of high-risk patients to determine effects on clinical outcomes in this setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Emergency medicine; Fluid therapy; Resuscitation; Sepsis; Septic shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30382308     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5433-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; John Myburgh; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Anthony C Gordon; Derek C Angus; Francois Lamontagne; Flavia Machado; James A Russell; Jean-Francois Timsit; John C Marshall; John Myburgh; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death.

Authors:  Diana J Kelm; Jared T Perrin; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Ognjen Gajic; Louis Schenck; Cassie C Kennedy
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Paul S Myles; Rinaldo Bellomo; Tomas Corcoran; Andrew Forbes; Philip Peyton; David Story; Chris Christophi; Kate Leslie; Shay McGuinness; Rachael Parke; Jonathan Serpell; Matthew T V Chan; Thomas Painter; Stuart McCluskey; Gary Minto; Sophie Wallace
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Unintended Consequences: Fluid Resuscitation Worsens Shock in an Ovine Model of Endotoxemia.

Authors:  Liam Byrne; Nchafatso G Obonyo; Sara D Diab; Kimble R Dunster; Margaret R Passmore; Ai-Ching Boon; Louise See Hoe; Sanne Pedersen; Mohd Hashairi Fauzi; Leticia Pretti Pimenta; Frank Van Haren; Christopher M Anstey; Louise Cullen; John-Paul Tung; Kiran Shekar; Kathryn Maitland; John F Fraser
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 30.528

8.  Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Xiaowu Bai; Wenkui Yu; Wu Ji; Zhiliang Lin; Shanjun Tan; Kaipeng Duan; Yi Dong; Lin Xu; Ning Li
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen P J Macdonald; David McD Taylor; Gerben Keijzers; Glenn Arendts; Daniel M Fatovich; Frances B Kinnear; Simon G A Brown; Rinaldo Bellomo; Sally Burrows; John F Fraser; Edward Litton; Juan Carlos Ascencio-Lane; Matthew Anstey; David McCutcheon; Lisa Smart; Ioana Vlad; James Winearls; Bradley Wibrow
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Maintenance fluid therapy and fluid creep impose more significant fluid, sodium, and chloride burdens than resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients: a retrospective study in a tertiary mixed ICU population.

Authors:  Niels Van Regenmortel; Walter Verbrugghe; Ella Roelant; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Philippe G Jorens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  25 in total

1.  Focus on fluid therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Peter B Hjortrup; Yaseen Arabi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Cardiovascular clusters in septic shock combining clinical and echocardiographic parameters: a post hoc analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Geri; Philippe Vignon; Alix Aubry; Anne-Laure Fedou; Cyril Charron; Stein Silva; Xavier Repessé; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Evidence-based interdisciplinary treatment of abdominal sepsis].

Authors:  T Schmoch; M Al-Saeedi; A Hecker; D C Richter; T Brenner; T Hackert; M A Weigand
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wang; Jeffrey R Strich; Willard N Applefeld; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Feasibility of conservative fluid administration and deresuscitation compared with usual care in critical illness: the Role of Active Deresuscitation After Resuscitation-2 (RADAR-2) randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Jonathan A Silversides; Ross McMullan; Lydia M Emerson; Ian Bradbury; Jonathan Bannard-Smith; Tamas Szakmany; John Trinder; Anthony J Rostron; Paul Johnston; Andrew J Ferguson; Andrew J Boyle; Bronagh Blackwood; John C Marshall; Daniel F McAuley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Application and significance of PiCCO monitoring technique combined with troponin I detection in fluid resuscitation of elderly patients with septic myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  Guojun Pan; Xiuli Fan; Jie Bian; Zemin He; Jiajun Yue; Hua Sun; Fei Zou; Chenglei Chao; Yiqun Chao; Ying Fu; Xiao Wang; Shuhua Chen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Restrictive fluid management versus usual care in acute kidney injury (REVERSE-AKI): a pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial.

Authors:  Suvi T Vaara; Marlies Ostermann; Laurent Bitker; Antoine Schneider; Elettra Poli; Eric Hoste; Jan Fierens; Michael Joannidis; Alexander Zarbock; Frank van Haren; John Prowle; Tuomas Selander; Minna Bäcklund; Ville Pettilä; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  The Effects of Biological Sex on Sepsis Treatments in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and a Narrative Elaboration on Sex- and Gender-Dependent Differences in Sepsis.

Authors:  MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 9.  Acute kidney injury in the critically ill: an updated review on pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Peter Pickkers; Michael Darmon; Eric Hoste; Michael Joannidis; Matthieu Legrand; Marlies Ostermann; John R Prowle; Antoine Schneider; Miet Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Pre-operative fluid resuscitation in the emergency general surgery septic patient: does it really matter?

Authors:  Benjamin Moran; Erin Major; Joseph A Kufera; Samuel A Tisherman; Jose Diaz
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.