Stephen P J Macdonald1,2,3, Gerben Keijzers4,5,6, David McD Taylor7,8, Frances Kinnear9, Glenn Arendts10,11,12, Daniel M Fatovich10,11,13, Rinaldo Bellomo14, David McCutcheon10,11,13,15, John F Fraser16, Juan-Carlos Ascencio-Lane17, Sally Burrows11, Edward Litton18, Amanda Harley4, Matthew Anstey19, Ashes Mukherjee15. 1. Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Australia. stephen.macdonald@uwa.edu.au. 2. Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. stephen.macdonald@uwa.edu.au. 3. Emergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia. stephen.macdonald@uwa.edu.au. 4. Emergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia. 5. School of Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia. 6. School of Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. 7. Emergency Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 9. Emergency Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 10. Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Australia. 11. Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 12. Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia. 13. Emergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia. 14. Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 15. Emergency Department, Armadale-Kelmscott Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia. 16. Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 17. Emergency Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia. 18. Department of Intensive Care, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia. 19. Department of Intensive Care, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if a regimen of restricted fluids and early vasopressor compared to usual care is feasible for initial resuscitation of hypotension due to suspected sepsis. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial of a restricted fluid resuscitation regimen in the first 6 h among patients in the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure under 100 mmHg, after minimum 1000 ml of IV fluid. Primary outcome was total fluid administered within 6 h post randomisation. RESULTS: There were 99 participants (50 restricted volume and 49 usual care) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median volume from presentation to 6 h in the restricted volume group was 2387 ml [first to third quartile (Q1-Q3) 1750-2750 ml]; 30 ml/kg (Q1-Q3 32-39 ml/kg) vs. 3000 ml (Q1-Q3 2250-3900 ml); 43 ml/kg (Q1-Q3 35-50 ml/kg) in the usual care group (p < 0.001). Median duration of vasopressor support was 21 h (Q1-Q3 9-42 h) vs. 33 h (Q1-Q3 15-50 h), (p = 0.13) in the restricted volume and usual care groups, respectively. At 90-days, 4 of 48 (8%) in the restricted volume group and 3 of 47 (6%) in the usual care group had died. Protocol deviations occurred in 6/50 (12%) in restricted group and 11/49 (22%) in the usual care group, and serious adverse events in four cases (8%) in each group. CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of restricted fluids and early vasopressor in ED patients with suspected sepsis and hypotension appears feasible. Illness severity was moderate and mortality rates low. A future trial is necessary with recruitment of high-risk patients to determine effects on clinical outcomes in this setting.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine if a regimen of restricted fluids and early vasopressor compared to usual care is feasible for initial resuscitation of hypotension due to suspected sepsis. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, open-label, clinical trial of a restricted fluid resuscitation regimen in the first 6 h among patients in the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure under 100 mmHg, after minimum 1000 ml of IV fluid. Primary outcome was total fluid administered within 6 h post randomisation. RESULTS: There were 99 participants (50 restricted volume and 49 usual care) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median volume from presentation to 6 h in the restricted volume group was 2387 ml [first to third quartile (Q1-Q3) 1750-2750 ml]; 30 ml/kg (Q1-Q3 32-39 ml/kg) vs. 3000 ml (Q1-Q3 2250-3900 ml); 43 ml/kg (Q1-Q3 35-50 ml/kg) in the usual care group (p < 0.001). Median duration of vasopressor support was 21 h (Q1-Q3 9-42 h) vs. 33 h (Q1-Q3 15-50 h), (p = 0.13) in the restricted volume and usual care groups, respectively. At 90-days, 4 of 48 (8%) in the restricted volume group and 3 of 47 (6%) in the usual care group had died. Protocol deviations occurred in 6/50 (12%) in restricted group and 11/49 (22%) in the usual care group, and serious adverse events in four cases (8%) in each group. CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of restricted fluids and early vasopressor in ED patients with suspected sepsis and hypotension appears feasible. Illness severity was moderate and mortality rates low. A future trial is necessary with recruitment of high-risk patients to determine effects on clinical outcomes in this setting.
Authors: Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Anders Perner; Anthony C Gordon; Derek C Angus; Francois Lamontagne; Flavia Machado; James A Russell; Jean-Francois Timsit; John C Marshall; John Myburgh; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Paul S Myles; Rinaldo Bellomo; Tomas Corcoran; Andrew Forbes; Philip Peyton; David Story; Chris Christophi; Kate Leslie; Shay McGuinness; Rachael Parke; Jonathan Serpell; Matthew T V Chan; Thomas Painter; Stuart McCluskey; Gary Minto; Sophie Wallace Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Liam Byrne; Nchafatso G Obonyo; Sara D Diab; Kimble R Dunster; Margaret R Passmore; Ai-Ching Boon; Louise See Hoe; Sanne Pedersen; Mohd Hashairi Fauzi; Leticia Pretti Pimenta; Frank Van Haren; Christopher M Anstey; Louise Cullen; John-Paul Tung; Kiran Shekar; Kathryn Maitland; John F Fraser Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Stephen P J Macdonald; David McD Taylor; Gerben Keijzers; Glenn Arendts; Daniel M Fatovich; Frances B Kinnear; Simon G A Brown; Rinaldo Bellomo; Sally Burrows; John F Fraser; Edward Litton; Juan Carlos Ascencio-Lane; Matthew Anstey; David McCutcheon; Lisa Smart; Ioana Vlad; James Winearls; Bradley Wibrow Journal: Trials Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Niels Van Regenmortel; Walter Verbrugghe; Ella Roelant; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Philippe G Jorens Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jonathan A Silversides; Ross McMullan; Lydia M Emerson; Ian Bradbury; Jonathan Bannard-Smith; Tamas Szakmany; John Trinder; Anthony J Rostron; Paul Johnston; Andrew J Ferguson; Andrew J Boyle; Bronagh Blackwood; John C Marshall; Daniel F McAuley Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Suvi T Vaara; Marlies Ostermann; Laurent Bitker; Antoine Schneider; Elettra Poli; Eric Hoste; Jan Fierens; Michael Joannidis; Alexander Zarbock; Frank van Haren; John Prowle; Tuomas Selander; Minna Bäcklund; Ville Pettilä; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-14
Authors: Peter Pickkers; Michael Darmon; Eric Hoste; Michael Joannidis; Matthieu Legrand; Marlies Ostermann; John R Prowle; Antoine Schneider; Miet Schetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 17.440