B S Buddeberg1, R Sharma2, J M O'Driscoll2,3, A Kaelin Agten4,5, A Khalil4,5, B Thilaganathan4,5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 2. Department of Cardiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. School of Human and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK. 4. Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, London, UK. 5. Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is an increasing problem worldwide, with well recognized detrimental effects on cardiovascular health; however, very little is known about the effect of obesity on cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy. The aim of the present study was to compare biventricular cardiac function at term between obese pregnant women and pregnant women with normal body weight, utilizing conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking assessment. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study of 40 obese, but otherwise healthy, pregnant women with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 35 kg/m2 and 40 healthy pregnant women with a BMI of ≤ 30 kg/m2 . All women underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic examination and speckle-tracking assessment at term. RESULTS: Obese pregnant women, compared with controls, had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (117 vs 109 mmHg; P = 0.002), cardiac output (6.73 vs 4.90 L/min; P < 0.001), left ventricular (LV) mass index (74 vs 64 g/m2 ; P < 0.001) and relative wall thickness (0.43 vs 0.37; P < 0.001). Diastolic dysfunction was present in five (12.5%) controls and 16 (40%) obese women (P = 0.004). In obese women, compared with controls, LV global longitudinal strain (-15.59 vs -17.61%; P < 0.001), LV endocardial (-17.30 vs -19.84%; P < 0.001) and epicardial (-13.10 vs -15.73%; P < 0.001) global longitudinal strain as well as LV early diastolic strain rate (1.05 vs 1.24 /s; P = 0.006) were all significantly reduced. No differences were observed in the degree of LV twist and torsion between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese, but otherwise healthy, pregnant women at term had significant LV hypertrophy with evidence of diastolic dysfunction and impaired deformation indices compared with pregnant women of normal weight. These findings are likely to represent a maladaptive response of the heart to volume overload in obese pregnancy. The impact of theses changes on pregnancy outcome and long-term maternal outcome is unclear.
OBJECTIVE:Obesity is an increasing problem worldwide, with well recognized detrimental effects on cardiovascular health; however, very little is known about the effect of obesity on cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy. The aim of the present study was to compare biventricular cardiac function at term between obese pregnant women and pregnant women with normal body weight, utilizing conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking assessment. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study of 40 obese, but otherwise healthy, pregnant women with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 35 kg/m2 and 40 healthy pregnant women with a BMI of ≤ 30 kg/m2 . All women underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic examination and speckle-tracking assessment at term. RESULTS:Obese pregnant women, compared with controls, had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (117 vs 109 mmHg; P = 0.002), cardiac output (6.73 vs 4.90 L/min; P < 0.001), left ventricular (LV) mass index (74 vs 64 g/m2 ; P < 0.001) and relative wall thickness (0.43 vs 0.37; P < 0.001). Diastolic dysfunction was present in five (12.5%) controls and 16 (40%) obesewomen (P = 0.004). In obesewomen, compared with controls, LV global longitudinal strain (-15.59 vs -17.61%; P < 0.001), LV endocardial (-17.30 vs -19.84%; P < 0.001) and epicardial (-13.10 vs -15.73%; P < 0.001) global longitudinal strain as well as LV early diastolic strain rate (1.05 vs 1.24 /s; P = 0.006) were all significantly reduced. No differences were observed in the degree of LV twist and torsion between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese, but otherwise healthy, pregnant women at term had significant LV hypertrophy with evidence of diastolic dysfunction and impaired deformation indices compared with pregnant women of normal weight. These findings are likely to represent a maladaptive response of the heart to volume overload in obese pregnancy. The impact of theses changes on pregnancy outcome and long-term maternal outcome is unclear.
Authors: Lidia Oltra; Virginia Reverte; Antonio Tapia; Juan M Moreno; Francisco J Salazar; María T Llinás Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240