Literature DB >> 30380920

Gleaning Information for Cognitive Operations from Don't Know Responses in Cognitive and Noncognitive Assessments.

Edward H Ip1,2, Michelle F Magee3,4, Gretchen A Youssef3, Shyh-Huei Chen1.   

Abstract

The Don't Know (DK) response - taking the form of an omitted response or not-reached at the end of a cognitive test, or explicitly presented as a response option in a social survey - contains important information that is often overlooked. Direct psychometric modeling efforts for DK responses are few and far between. In this article, the linear logistic test model (LLTM) is proposed for delineating the impacts of cognitive operations for a test that contains DK responses. We assume that the DK response is a valid response. The assumption is reasonable for many situations, including low-stakes cognitive tests and attitudinal assessments. By extracting information embedded in the DK response, the method shows how DK can inform the latent construct of interest and the cognitive operations underlying the response to stimuli. Using a proven recoding scheme, the LLTM could be implemented through commonly used programs such as PROC GLIMMIX. Two simulation experiments to evaluate how well the parameters can be recovered were conducted. In addition, two real data examples, from a noncognitive test of health belief assessment and a cognitive test of knowledge in diabetes, are also presented as case studies to illustrate the LLTM for DK response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Item response theory; diabetes knowledge; item attribute; linear logistic test model; person covariate

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30380920      PMCID: PMC6494712          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1503075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  10 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Validation of Cognitive Structures: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Dimiter M Dimitrov; Tenko Raykov
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Item response theory and clinical measurement.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Niels G Waller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

4.  Older adults' common sense models of diabetes.

Authors:  Joseph G Grzywacz; Thomas A Arcury; Edward H Ip; Christine Chapman; Julienne K Kirk; Ronny A Bell; Sara A Quandt
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2011-05

5.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Generalized linear model for partially ordered data.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Edward Haksing Ip
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  UNCERTAINTY IN EARLY OCCUPATIONAL ASPIRATIONS: ROLE EXPLORATION OR AIMLESSNESS?

Authors:  Jeremy Staff; Angel Harris; Ricardo Sabates; Laine Briddell
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2010-12

9.  Analysis of Multiple Partially Ordered Responses to Belief Items with Don't Know Option.

Authors:  Edward H Ip; Shyh-Huei Chen; Sara A Quandt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  A nonlinear mixed model framework for item response theory.

Authors:  Frank Rijmen; Francis Tuerlinckx; Paul De Boeck; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.