Literature DB >> 30375949

Visuo-Proprioceptive Matching Errors Are Consistent with Biases in Distance Judgments.

Irene A Kuling1,2, Willem J de Bruijne1, Kimberley Burgering1, Eli Brenner1, Jeroen B J Smeets1.   

Abstract

People make systematic errors when matching the location of an unseen index finger with that of a visual target. These errors are consistent over time, but idiosyncratic and surprisingly task-specific. The errors that are made when moving the unseen index finger to a visual target are not consistent with the errors when moving a visual target to the unseen index finger. To test whether such inconsistencies arise because a large part of the matching errors originate during movement execution, we compared errors in moving the unseen finger to a target with biases in deciding which of two visual targets was closer to the index finger before the movement. We found that the judgment as to which is the closest target was consistent with the matching errors. This means that inconsistencies in visuo-proprioceptive matching errors are not caused by systematic errors in movement execution, but are likely to be related to biases in sensory transformations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  perceptual judgments; proprioception; proprioceptive position sense; sensory matching

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30375949     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2018.1528435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  2 in total

1.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning a reach trajectory based on binary reward feedback.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Nina M van Mastrigt; Emily M Crowe; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.