| Literature DB >> 30375514 |
Wen-Hsuan Tseng1, Jhan-Wei Lin1, Chen-Han Lou1, Ko-Huan Lee1, Leang-Shin Wu2, Tzi-Yuan Wang3, Feng-Yu Wang4, Duncan J Irschick5, Si-Min Lin6.
Abstract
Expression of nuptial color is usually energetically costly, and is therefore regarded as an 'honest signal' to reflect mate quality. In order to choose a mate with high quality, both sexes may benefit from the ability to precisely evaluate their mates through optimizing visual systems which is in turn partially regulated by opsin gene modification. However, how terrestrial vertebrates regulate their color vision sensitivity is poorly studied. The green-spotted grass lizard Takydromus viridipunctatus is a sexually dimorphic lizard in which males exhibit prominent green lateral colors in the breeding season. In order to clarify relationships among male coloration, female preference, and chromatic visual sensitivity, we conducted testosterone manipulation with mate choice experiments, and evaluated the change of opsin gene expression from different testosterone treatments and different seasons. The results indicated that males with testosterone supplementation showed a significant increase in nuptial color coverage, and were preferred by females in mate choice experiments. By using quantitative PCR (qPCR), we also found that higher levels of testosterone may lead to an increase in rhodopsin-like 2 (rh2) and a decrease in long-wavelength sensitive (lws) gene expression in males, a pattern which was also observed in wild males undergoing maturation as they approached the breeding season. In contrast, females showed the opposite pattern, with increased lws and decreased rh2 expression in the breeding season. We suggest this alteration may facilitate the ability of male lizards to more effectively evaluate color cues, and also may provide females with the ability to more effectively evaluate the brightness of potential mates. Our findings suggest that both sexes of this chromatically dimorphic lizard regulate their opsin expression seasonally, which might play an important role in the evolution of nuptial coloration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30375514 PMCID: PMC6207759 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34284-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Nuptial coloration measured and plotted as percent reflectance spectra (mean values with standard deviation) from 6 males and 6 females in the breeding season. The white arrows indicate color patches which we measured from (A) anterior lateral regions; (B) posterior lateral regions; and (C) ventrolateral green lines. Differences in reflectance between two sexes are found at their lateral side.
Figure 2Changes of lateral green color coverage after testosterone (T) treatments on males. The enhancement ratios significantly differed among treatments (Kruskal-Wallis tests: χ2 = 7.09, df = 2, p = 0.03). Provision of exogenous testosterone significantly enhanced the coverage of the greenish nuptial color (middle and right).
Figure 3Net time differences (in seconds) between the times spent by a female positioned nearby the two males with different green color coverages within the 1-hour record interval. Compared to controls, medium and high testosterone (T) treated males received a significantly longer attraction from the females for a mean of 408.4 and 301.4 seconds, respectively (left and middle). On the other hand, males masked with pale brown paints lost to the control males for a mean of 559.7 seconds (right). Asterisks denote the statistical significance in pair t-test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001).
Figure 4Cone opsin gene expression profiles from (A) males and (B) females in different seasons and the effect of testosterone treatment. The males showed a prominent trend of increased rh2 and decreased lws expression as approaching the breeding season; while the females showed a reverse pattern. Colored bars shown as mean ± 1 S.D., asterisks mark the statistically significant differences in student’s t-test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001) for each cone opsin gene.
Figure 5Intersexual comparison of (A) lws and (B) rh2 between males and females in breeding and non-breeding seasons. Colored bar shown as mean ± 1 S.D.; asterisks mark the statistically significant differences in student’s t-test (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001) between the two sexes.