| Literature DB >> 30374304 |
S M Neamul Kabir Zihad1, Niloy Bhowmick1, Shaikh Jamal Uddin1, Nazifa Sifat1, Md Shamim Rahman2, Razina Rouf3, Muhammad Torequl Islam4,5, Shrabanti Dev1, Hazrina Hazni6, Shahin Aziz7, Eunüs S Ali8, Asish K Das1, Jamil A Shilpi1, Lutfun Nahar9, Satyajit D Sarker9.
Abstract
Present study was undertaken to evaluate the analgesic activity of the ethanol extract of Chrysopogon aciculatus. In addition to bioassays in mice, chemical profiling was done by LC-MS and GC-MS to identify phytochemicals, which were further docked on the catalytic site of COX-2 enzymes with a view to suggest the possible role of such phytoconstituents in the observed analgesic activity. Analgesic activity of C. aciculatus was evaluated by acetic acid induced writhing reflex method and hot plate technique. Phytochemical profiling was conducted using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In docking studies, homology model of human COX-2 enzyme was prepared using Easy Modeler 4.0 and the identified phytoconstituents were docked using Autodock Vina. Preliminary acute toxicity test of the ethanol extract of C. aciculatus showed no sign of mortality at the highest dose of 4,000 mg/kg. The whole plant extract significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited acetic acid induced writhing in mice at the doses of 500 and 750 mg/kg. The extract delayed the response time in hot plate test in a dose dependent manner. LC-MS analysis of the plant extract revealed the presence of aciculatin, nudaphantin and 5α,8α-epidioxyergosta-6,22-diene-3β-ol. Three compounds namely citronellylisobutyrate; 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-(2H)-1,4-benzoxazin-3(4H)-one and nudaphantin were identified in the n-hexane fraction by GC-MS. Among these compounds, six were found to be interacting with the binding site for arachidonic acid in COX-2 enzyme. Present study strongly supports the traditional use of C. aciculatus in the management of pain. In conclusion, compounds (tricin, campesterol, gamma oryzanol, and citronellyl isobutyrate) showing promising binding affinity in docking studies, along with previously known anti-inflammatory compound aciculatin can be held responsible for the observed activity.Entities:
Keywords: Chrysopogon aciculatus; aciculatin; analgesic; docking; gas chromatography mass spectrometry; hot plate test; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; poaceae
Year: 2018 PMID: 30374304 PMCID: PMC6196237 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Effect of C. aciculatus extract on acetic acid induced writhing in mice.
| Treatment Groups ( | Dose (mg/kg b.w.) | Number of writhing |
|---|---|---|
| Control (1% Tween 80 in water) | 10 ml/kg | 31.2 ± 1.49 |
| Diclofenac sodium | 25 | 8.4 ± 0.51∗∗ |
| 500 | 20.2 ± 0.86∗ | |
| 750 | 16.8 ± 1.07∗∗ | |
Effect of C. aciculatus extract in hot plate test in mice.
| Treatment Groups ( | Dose (mg/kg) | Reaction time (sec) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | 120 min | ||
| Control (1% Tween 80 in water) | 10 ml/kg | 4.20 ± 0.09 | 4.02 ± 0.165 | 4.01 ± 0.205 | 4.01 ± 0.201 | 4.02 ± 0.196 |
| Morphine | 25 | 4.24 ± 0.08 | 7.5 ± 0.15∗∗ | 12.6 ± 0.22∗∗ | 10.62 ± 0.18∗∗ | 8.31 ± 0.27∗∗ |
| 500 | 4.12 ± 0.16 | 5.33 ± 0.28∗ | 6.72 ± 0.19∗∗ | 6.49 ± 0.23∗∗ | 5.23 ± 0.08∗∗ | |
| 750 | 4.37 ± 0.06 | 6.63 ± 0.20∗∗ | 7.72 ± 0.20∗∗ | 6.65 ± 0.29∗∗ | 5.44 ± 0.19∗∗ | |
Compounds identified in the ethanol extract of C. aciculatus using LC-MS.
| RT (min) | [M + H]+ experimental | Molecular formula | Molecular mass Calculated | Suggested compound | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From previously reported compounds | 21.5 | 415.30 | C22H22O8 | 414.41 | Aciculatin | |
| 21.7 | 391.28 | C21H26O7 | 390.432 | Nudaphantin | ||
| 29.3 | 429.37 | C28H44O3 | 428.657 | 5α,8α-epidioxyergosta-6,22-diene-3β-ol/Ergosterol peroxide | ||
| From Poaceae family | 1.72 | 571.26 | C30H18O12 | 570.462 | Aurofusarin | |
| 1.79 | 603.34 | C40H58O4 | 602.9 | Gamma-oryzanol | ||
| 2.17 | 317.18 | C16H12O7 | 316.265 | Isorhamnetin | ||
| 2.25 | 331.28 | C17H14O7 | 330.29 | Tricin | ||
| 31.54 | 279.15 | C18H30O2 | 278.436 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid | ||
| 35.81 | 297.23 | C12H12N2O3S2 | 296.37 | |||
| 35.95 | 473.34 | C31H52O3 | 472.41 | Campesterol | ||
| 41.14 | 469.32 | C32H52O2 | 468.766 | Lupeol acetate | ||
Chemical constituents identified in the n-hexane fraction of C. aciculatus extract by GC-MS.
| Peak no. | RT | %Area | %Height | A/H | Compound analyzed | Probable molecular weight | Probable molecular formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.89 | 18.58 | 11.81 | 8.54 | Citronellyl Isobutyrate | 226 | C14H26O2 | |
| 38.21 | 4.57 | 4.47 | 5.53 | 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-(2H)-1,4-benzoxazin-3(4H)-one (DIMBOA) | 211.17 | C9H9NO5 | |
| 53.94 | 76.85 | 83.72 | 4.98 | Nudaphantin | 390.42 | C21H26O7 | |
Results of docking studies of the compounds identified in C. aciculatus extract on COX-2 enzyme.