| Literature DB >> 30373176 |
Youssef Bouafifssa1, Lara Manyes2, Mohamed Rahouti3, Jordi Mañes4, Houda Berrada5, Abdellah Zinedine6, Mónica Fernández-Franzón7.
Abstract
In the present study, the multi-occurrence of twenty (20) mycotoxins in pasta samples consumed in Morocco was assessed. For this, a modified Quick, Easy, Cheap Effective, Rugged, and Safe method was validated. The mycotoxins studied were identified and quantified by liquid chromatography⁻tandem mass spectrometry (LC⁻MS/MS) and gas chromatography⁻tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). The validated method was applied to one hundred and six (n = 106) pasta samples purchased from several areas in the country. The analytical results showed that 99 out of 106 total samples (93.4%) were contaminated with at least one mycotoxin. Nine mycotoxins (Aflatoxin B1, Enniatin B, Enniatin B1, Enniatin A1, Zearalenone, Deoxynivalenol, 3-Acetyl-Deoxynivalenol, T-2, and HT-2 toxins) were present in the pasta samples. Enniatin B and Enniatin B1 were the predominant mycotoxins. The Zearalenone, Deoxynivalenol, HT-2, and T-2 toxins were present in 51.8%, 43.5%, 34.9%, and 16% of samples, respectively. Aflatoxin B1 was detected in only 2 samples. Risk exposure assessment concluded that mycotoxin levels found in pasta do not pose a significant human health risk for the Moroccan population. This is the first paper drafted on the multi-occurrence of mycotoxins in pasta from this country.Entities:
Keywords: QuEChERS; mycotoxins; occurrence; pasta; risk assessment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373176 PMCID: PMC6266187 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10110432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
The sensitivity, recovery, linearity, and matrix effects using the liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical method.
| Mycotoxin | LOD | Mean Recovery (%) | Intra-Day (RSD%) | Inter-Day (RSD%) | Matrix Effects SSE (%) | r2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 50 | 100 | ||||||
| AFB1 | 0.01 | 108 ± 19 | 114 ± 8 | 78 ± 12 | 11 | 19 | 51 | 0.9914 |
| AFB2 | 0.5 | 60 ± 17 | 71 ± 12 | 94 ± 11 | 8 | 17 | 45 | 0.9983 |
| AFG1 | 0.03 | 59 ± 18 | 65 ± 11 | 93 ± 11 | 12 | 18 | 34 | 0.9935 |
| AFG2 | 0.02 | 80 ± 12 | 63 ± 10 | 87 ± 12 | 6 | 12 | 64 | 0.9648 |
| ENA | 0.025 | 117 ± 16 | 92 ± 8 | 86 ± 9 | 10 | 16 | 69 | 0.9952 |
| ENA1 | 0.025 | 112 ± 15 | 83 ± 11 | 86 ± 10 | 11 | 15 | 67 | 0.9890 |
| ENB | 0.03 | 96 ± 10 | 102 ± 9 | 116 ± 12 | 8 | 10 | 62 | 0.9910 |
| ENB1 | 0.015 | 65 ± 11 | 64 ± 10 | 63 ± 18 | 6 | 16 | 27 | 0.9932 |
| FB1 | 3 | 60 ± 10 | 67 ± 12 | 64 ± 17 | 6 | 12 | 55 | 0.9846 |
| FB2 | 3 | 86 ± 13 | 47 ± 16 | 61 ± 17 | 8 | 19 | 58 | 0.9948 |
| FB3 | 10 | 86 ± 15 | 67 ± 17 | 61 ± 15 | 11 | 13 | 58 | 0.9949 |
| BEA | 1 | 63 ± 14 | 60 ± 15 | 64 ± 17 | 6 | 12 | 66 | 0.9920 |
| ZEA | 0.5 | 103 ± 12 | 105 ± 11 | 98 ± 13 | 8 | 14 | 71 | 0.9860 |
LOD: limit of detection; RSD: relative standard deviation; SSE: signal suppression/enhancement; r2: regression coefficient.
The linearity, recovery, and limit of detection and quantification (LOD/LOQ) using the gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analytical method.
| Mycotoxins | r2 | LOD | LOQ | Recoveries (%) | Intra-Day | Inter-Day | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 50 | 100 | ||||||
| DON | 0.9993 | 0.5 | 1 | 85 ± 16 | 89 ± 11 | 86 ± 8 | 7 | 11 |
| 3-ADON | 0.9998 | 1 | 3 | 95 ± 11 | 72 ± 11 | 62 ± 12 | 9 | 11 |
| 15-ADON | 0.9966 | 1 | 3 | 69 ± 12 | 69 ± 15 | 62 ± 21 | 13 | 15 |
| NIV | 0.9972 | 1 | 2.5 | 97 ± 4 | 86 ± 14 | 65 ± 9 | 2 | 14 |
| T-2 | 0.9993 | 2 | 5 | 80 ± 11 | 69 ± 16 | 62 ± 14 | 5 | 20 |
| HT-2 | 0.9885 | 2.5 | 5 | 69 ± 10 | 68 ± 9 | 81 ± 11 | 15 | 19 |
| FUS X | 0.9429 | 5 | 10 | 84 ± 9 | 73 ± 12 | 67 ± 20 | 10 | 12 |
r2: regression coefficient; RSD: relative standard deviation.
The multi-mycotoxin occurrence in the analyzed pasta samples.
| Mycotoxin | Agadir ( | Casablanca ( | Fes ( | Tanger ( | Rabat ( | Sale ( | Kenitra ( | Temara ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | Positive Samples | Range | |
| AFB1 | 1 | 0.25 | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d |
| ENA1 | 0 | n.d | 4 | 0.025–0.03 | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 6 | 0.025–0.03 | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d |
| ENB | 8 | 0.05–0.09 | 10 | 0.03–1.2 | 8 | 0.05–0.3 | 5 | 0.04–1 | 13 | 0.09–1 | 10 | 0.05–1 | 11 | 0.03–0.09 | 7 | 0.03–0.07 |
| ENB1 | 8 | 0.06–0.012 | 10 | 0.7–1 | 8 | 0.2–0.6 | 5 | 0.02–0.6 | 13 | 0.3–1 | 10 | 0.4–0.9 | 11 | 0.2–0.7 | 7 | 0.2–0.8 |
| ZEA | 9 | 0.6–1 | 13 | 0.9–3 | 3 | 0.5–0.9 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 1–2.4 | 5 | 0.5–2 | 2 | 0.5–0.9 | 3 | 0.7–1 |
| DON | 2 | 292–900 | 10 | 271–830 | 2 | 479–668 | 4 | 719–770 | 9 | 16–538 | 8 | 137–671 | 3 | 23–138 | 5 | 232–301 |
| 3-ADON | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d | 0 | n.d |
| HT-2 | 2 | 7–31 | 8 | 9–419 | 3 | 13–19 | 6 | 4–22 | 7 | 9–75 | 4 | 38–88 | 4 | 3–9 | 3 | 4–27 |
| T-2 | 2 | 4–21 | 3 | 11–33 | 2 | 13–19 | 2 | 4–50 | 2 | 8–48 | 2 | 9–47 | 2 | 12–22 | 2 | 5–33 |
n: number; n.d: Not detected.
Figure 1The chromatograms of two samples of pasta naturally contaminated with (A) enniatin B1 (1 µg kg−1) and (B) enniatin B (1.2 µg kg−1).
Figure 2A Chromatogram of a pasta sample with the co-occurrence of five mycotoxins. DON, deoxynivalenol; AFB1, aflatoxin B1; ZEA, zearalenone; ENB1, enniatin B1; ENB, enniatin B.
The estimated exposure of the studied mycotoxins.
| Mycotoxin | Cm | K | PDIm | TDI | % TDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DON + 3-ADON + 15-ADON | 440.95 | 11.6 | 0.073 | 1 | 7.3 |
| HT-2 + T2 | 58.65 | 11.6 | 0.097 | 0.1 | 97 |
| ZEA | 1.20 | 11.6 | 0.0002 | 0.25 | 0.08 |
* Cm: Mean content of a mycotoxin (µg kg−1 pasta). ** K: Average consumption of the commodity (g person−1 day−1). *** PDIm: Probable daily intake (µg kg−1 bw day−1) for each mycotoxin. TDI: Tolerable daily intake.