Literature DB >> 23494486

Frequency of monitoring, non-adherence, and other topics dear to an anticoagulation clinic provider.

Nathan P Clark1.   

Abstract

Historically, there has been limited data informing practical matters encountered in day-to-day warfarin management. Several studies have recently explored topics that address several of these gaps in the literature. Extending INR recheck intervals to 12 weeks is feasible with comparable time-in-therapeutic range compared to traditional 4 week intervals. Patients more likely to maintain stable anticoagulation are older, have an INR target of 2-3 (versus higher targets), and do not have heart failure. Unsurprisingly, non-adherence with reliably taking warfarin is associated with poor anticoagulation control. In addition, non-adherence with INR monitoring is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. Evidence-based interventions to improve adherence are lacking. When managing a modestly out of range INR value in previously stable warfarin patients, providers have a few options: 1) change the maintenance warfarin dose, 2) give a one-time dose adjustment, followed by resumption of the previous warfarin dose, or 3) continue the same warfarin dose with no adjustment. Each of these options can be successful, particularly when paired with increased INR monitoring. Bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin for a single subtherapeutic INR is not warranted for most patients. The 9th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis chapter "Evidence-Based Management of Anticoagulant Therapy" reviews these and many new and practical recommendations for anticoagulation clinic providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23494486     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-013-0887-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  15 in total

1.  Outcomes and predictors of very stable INR control during chronic anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Thomas Delate; Nathan P Clark; Chad Martell; Thu Tran; Mark A Crowther; David A Garcia; Walter Ageno; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Impact of adherence, knowledge, and quality of life on anticoagulation control.

Authors:  Nichola J Davis; Henny H Billett; Hillel W Cohen; Julia H Arnsten
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Single-dose adjustment versus no adjustment of warfarin in stably anticoagulated patients with an occasional international normalized ratio (INR) out of range.

Authors:  S Schulman; A Melinyshyn; D Ennis; L Rudd-Scott
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Predictors of noncompliance with warfarin therapy in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic.

Authors:  Ian A Orensky; David A Holdford
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Randomized trial of lottery-based incentives to improve warfarin adherence.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Andrea B Troxel; George Loewenstein; Colleen M Brensinger; Jane Jaskowiak; Jalpa A Doshi; Mitchell Laskin; Kevin Volpp
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valves with a subtherapeutic international normalized ratio: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Francesco Dentali; Pasquale Pignatelli; Alessandra Malato; Daniela Poli; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Elena Rancan; Daniele Pastori; Elisa Grifoni; Elena Grifoni; Alessandro Squizzato; Sergio Siragusa; Giovanni Di Minno; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 10.047

7.  Reexamining the recommended follow-up interval after obtaining an in-range international normalized ratio value: results from the Veterans Affairs study to improve anticoagulation.

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Al Ozonoff; Dan R Berlowitz; Arlene S Ash; Joel I Reisman; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Sameer Parpia; Clare Stewart; Lisa Rudd-Scott; Jim A Julian; Mark Levine
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Adherence to warfarin assessed by electronic pill caps, clinician assessment, and patient reports: results from the IN-RANGE study.

Authors:  Catherine S Parker; Zhen Chen; Maureen Price; Robert Gross; Joshua P Metlay; Jason D Christie; Colleen M Brensinger; Craig W Newcomb; Frederick F Samaha; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients with mechanical heart valves with a subtherapeutic international normalized ratio.

Authors:  Francesco Dentali; Nicoletta Riva; Alessandra Malato; Giorgia Saccullo; Sergio Siragusa; Walter Ageno
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  6 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of a 12-week INR follow-up protocol over 2 years in an anticoagulation clinic: a single-arm prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea L Porter; Amanda R Margolis; Carla E Staresinic; Michael W Nagy; Rebecca R Schoen; Cheryl A Ray; Christopher D Fletcher
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Implementation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in daily practice: the need for comprehensive education for professionals and patients.

Authors:  Hein Heidbuchel; Dana Berti; Manuel Campos; Lien Desteghe; Ana Parente Freixo; António Robalo Nunes; Vanessa Roldán; Vincenzo Toschi; Riitta Lassila
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 3.  Measurement of non-VKA oral anticoagulants versus classic ones: the appropriate use of hemostasis assays.

Authors:  Jonathan Douxfils; Anne Tamigniau; Bernard Chatelain; Catherine Goffinet; Jean-Michel Dogné; François Mullier
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-04

4.  Anticoagulated patient's perception of their illness, their beliefs about the anticoagulant therapy prescribed and the relationship with adherence: impact of novel oral anticoagulant therapy - study protocol for The Switching Study: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vivian Auyeung; Jignesh P Patel; John K Abdou; Bipin Vadher; Lynda Bonner; Alison Brown; Lara N Roberts; Raj K Patel; Roopen Arya
Journal:  BMC Hematol       Date:  2016-08-23

5.  Barriers and facilitators to reducing frequent laboratory testing for patients who are stable on warfarin: a mixed methods study of de-implementation in five anticoagulation clinics.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Sevan Misirliyan; Scott Kaatz; Elizabeth A Jackson; Brian Haymart; Eva Kline-Rogers; Jay Kozlowski; Gregory Krol; James B Froehlich; Anne Sales
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Rosendaal linear interpolation method appraising of time in therapeutic range in patients with 12-week follow-up interval after mechanical heart valve replacement.

Authors:  Xiliang Zhu; Xijun Xiao; Sheng Wang; Xianjie Chen; Guoqing Lu; Xiaoyang Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.