Literature DB >> 30368564

Spatial correlation between localized decreases in exploratory visual search performance and areas of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Cassia Senger1, Marcelo Jordão Lopes da Silva1, Carlos Gustavo De Moraes2, André Messias1, Jayter Silva Paula3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visual search is a critical skill for several daily tasks and may be compromised in patients with impaired vision. The objective of this study was to study the relationships between exploratory visual search performance (EVSP) visual field (VF) sensitivity in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: Primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG; n = 29) and healthy (Control; n = 28) individuals with best corrected visual acuity better than 0.2 logMAR underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including Humphrey VF tests (24-2 SITA-Standard), and a monocular exploratory visual search digit-based task performed using a software that quantifies the time spent to find a targert on a random array of digits distributed on nine sequential screens. The screens were divided into five areas to topographically match with five VF sectors.
RESULTS: As expected, POAG eyes had worse VF mean deviation (MD) sensitivity and EVSP than Controls (MD - 8.02 ± 7.88 dB vs - 1.43 ± 1.50 dB, p < 0.0001; and total EVSP time 106.42 ± 59.64 s vs 52.75 ± 19.07 s, p < 0.0001). MD sensitivity of both groups significantly correlated with total EVSP time (POAG r = - 0.45, p = 0.01; and Control r = 0.37, p = 0.049). A significant relationship was observed between EVSP (individual time) and both visual acuity (p = 0.006) and glaucoma diagnosis (p = 0.005). The mean sensitivity of the peripheral VF areas of the POAG group showed significant correlation with the individual search time in the corresponding spatial areas, except in the peripheral superior temporal area (r = - 0.35, p = 0.06).
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that POAG patients' EVSP is impaired in topographically-correspondent VF areas with sensitivity loss. Visual search may be considered as a measure of impairment of daily activities in glaucoma patients, if further similar tests using binocular conditions corroborate our findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primary open-angle glaucoma; Visual field defects; Visual impairment; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368564     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4164-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  46 in total

1.  Chromatic and achromatic defects in patients with progressing glaucoma.

Authors:  P Pearson; W H Swanson; R L Fellman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Electrophysiologic assessment of photoreceptor function in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  K Holopigian; V C Greenstein; W Seiple; D C Hood; R Ritch
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search.

Authors:  J H Bertera; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

4.  Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease.

Authors:  Richard P Mills; Donald L Budenz; Paul P Lee; Robert J Noecker; John G Walt; Lisa R Siegartel; Stacy J Evans; John J Doyle
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Open angle glaucoma effects on preattentive visual search efficiency for flicker, motion displacement and orientation pop-out tasks.

Authors:  James Loughman; Peter Davison; Ian Flitcroft
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Isolating the effects of primary open-angle glaucoma on the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  P A Sample; P S Juang; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  [New standardized texts in Brazilian Portuguese to assess reading speed--comparison with four European languages].

Authors:  André Messias; Antonio Augusto Velasco e Cruz; Sonia Jecov Schallenmüller; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.872

8.  Full-threshold versus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time.

Authors:  Rui Barroso Schimiti; Rodrigo Rezende Avelino; Newton Kara-José; Vital Paulino Costa
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  T Roth; A N Sokolov; A Messias; P Roth; M Weller; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project.

Authors:  Pradeep Y Ramulu; Sheila K West; Beatriz Munoz; Henry D Jampel; David S Friedman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of eye movements and visual performance in patients with cataract.

Authors:  Yu Wan; Jiarui Yang; Xiaotong Ren; Zitong Yu; Rong Zhang; Xuemin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Low-Contrast High-Pass Visual Acuity Might Help to Detect Glaucoma Damage: A Structure-Function Analysis.

Authors:  Yun Wen; Zidong Chen; Chengguo Zuo; Yangfan Yang; Jiangang Xu; Yang Kong; Hui Cheng; Minbin Yu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.