Literature DB >> 30366859

Coronary artery calcium: A technical argument for a new scoring method.

Martin J Willemink1, Niels R van der Werf2, Koen Nieman3, Marcel J W Greuter4, Lynne M Koweek5, Dominik Fleischmann6.   

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a strong predictor for future cardiovascular events. Traditionally CAC has been quantified using the Agatston score, which was developed in the late 1980s for electron beam tomography (EBT). While EBT has been completely replaced by modern multiple-detector row CT technology, the traditional CAC scoring method by Agatston remains in use, although the literature indicates suboptimal reproducibility and subjects being incorrectly classified. The traditional Agatston scoring method counteracts the technical advances of CT technology, and prevents the use of thinner sections, obtained at lower tube voltage and overall decreased radiation exposure that has become available to other CT applications. Moreover, recent studies have shown that not only the total amount of CAC, but also its density and distribution in the coronary arterial tree may be of prognostic value. Acquisition and reconstruction techniques thus need to be adapted for modern CT technology and optimized for CAC quantification. In this review we describe the technical limitations of the Agatston score followed by our suggestions for developing a new and more robust CAC quantification method.
Copyright © 2019 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agatston score; Computed tomography; Coronary artery calcium; Radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30366859     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  7 in total

1.  Technical Note: kV-independent coronary calcium scoring: A phantom evaluation of score accuracy and potential radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Shengzhen Tao; Emily Sheedy; Michael Bruesewitz; Nikkole Weber; Kyle Williams; Ahmed Halaweish; Bernhard Schmidt; Eric Williamson; Cynthia McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of the Agatston score acquired with photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT: ex vivo study of cadaveric hearts.

Authors:  Susann Skoog; Lilian Henriksson; Håkan Gustafsson; Mårten Sandstedt; Sebastian Elvelind; Anders Persson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  2022 ASNC/AAPM/SCCT/SNMMI guideline for the use of CT in hybrid nuclear/CT cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Timothy M Bateman; Kelley R Branch; Andrew Crean; Eric L Gingold; Randall C Thompson; Sarah E McKenney; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; Koen Nieman; Todd C Villines; Michael V Yester; Andrew J Einstein; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 4.  Reinventing Molecular Imaging with Total-Body PET, Part II: Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Babak Saboury; Michael A Morris; Moozhan Nikpanah; Thomas J Werner; Elizabeth C Jones; Abass Alavi
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2020-10

Review 5.  Emerging methods for the characterization of ischemic heart disease: ultrafast Doppler angiography, micro-CT, photon-counting CT, novel MRI and PET techniques, and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Akos Varga-Szemes; U Joseph Schoepf; Marina Codari; Koen Nieman; Dominik Fleischmann; Domenico Mastrodicasa
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  The Relationship of Coronary Artery Calcium and Clinical Coronary Artery Disease with Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Congying Xia; Marleen Vonder; Grigory Sidorenkov; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Cees de Groot; Pim van der Harst; Geertruida H de Bock; Peter Paul De Deyn; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.928

7.  Evaluating a calcium-aware kernel for CT CAC scoring with varying surrounding materials and heart rates: a dynamic phantom study.

Authors:  Niels R van der Werf; Ronald Booij; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas G Flohr; Tim Leiner; Joël J de Groen; Daniël Bos; Ricardo P J Budde; Martin J Willemink; Marcel J W Greuter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.