Literature DB >> 30366117

Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures with Bowel Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Eleftheria Kalogera1, Gretchen E Glaser1, Amanika Kumar1, Sean C Dowdy1, Carrie L Langstraat2.   

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach to perioperative care of the surgical patient. A mounting body of literature in gynecologic surgery has demonstrated that ERAS improves postoperative outcomes, shortens hospital length of stay, and reduces cost without increasing complications or readmissions. Most of the existing literature has concentrated on open surgery, questioning if patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery also derive benefit. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on ERAS after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) with and without bowel surgery. Given the paucity of studies on ERAS in MIGS with bowel surgery (1 study), we expanded our search to include studies of ERAS in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resections alone. Twelve studies were identified through an electronic database search of PubMed, Medline, and Ovid EMBASE. These studies included patients undergoing MIGS for benign and/or malignant indications and showed that ERAS pathways decreased length of stay and/or increased the proportion of same-day discharge surgeries, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced hospital costs while maintaining low postoperative complication and readmission rates. Although limited, data from a single study suggest that ERAS in MIGS with bowel surgery leads to shortened hospital stay, stable postoperative morbidity, and less readmissions. Although the variation between the published protocols underscores the need for standardization, existing literature supports the adoption of ERAS as safe and effective when planning MIGS.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel surgery; Enhanced recovery; Enhanced recovery pathway; Gynecologic surgery; Minimally invasive; Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30366117     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  7 in total

1.  Causes of prolonged hospitalization after open incisional hernia repair: an observational single-center retrospective study of a prospective database.

Authors:  D M Skovgaards; H M H Diab; H G Midtgaard; L N Jørgensen; K K Jensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Effect of Surgical Skin Antisepsis on Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Uri P Dior; Shamitha Kathurusinghe; Claudia Cheng; Charlotte Reddington; Andrew J Daley; Catarina Ang; Martin Healey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  AUGS-IUGA Joint clinical consensus statement on enhanced recovery after urogynecologic surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yulian Chen; Mingru Fu; Guifen Huang; Jiao Chen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-05

Review 5.  Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Janita Pak Chun Chau; Xu Liu; Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo; Wai Tong Chien; Sze Ki Hui; Kai Chow Choi; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 6.  [Enhanced recovery after surgery-Does the ERAS concept keep its promises].

Authors:  Wolfgang Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Evaluation of the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing a scheduled hysterectomy: a prospective single-centre before-after study protocol (RAACHYS study).

Authors:  Flora Martin; Nicolas Vautrin; Arpiné Ardzivian Elnar; Christophe Goetz; Antoine Bécret
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.