Literature DB >> 30364802

A dataset of LC-MS QTOF analysis of potato and mustard crop residue smoke water.

Gaurav S Dave1, Bhemji Galvadiya2, Himanshu Bariya2, Sudhanshu R Vyas1.   

Abstract

This data article comprises of the total LC-MS QTOF analysis of smoke water prepared from potato and mustard crop residue. LC-MS QTOF analysis revealed a total of 39 compounds from potato crop residue smoke water, whereas mustard crop residue smoke water exhibited 42 compounds. Molecular formula, mass, RT (retention time) and Area are described in the data presented here. Additionally, different database ID of the identified compounds are mentioned in the data table of potato and mustard crop residue smoke water.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crop residue; LC-MS QTOF; Smoke water

Year:  2018        PMID: 30364802      PMCID: PMC6197791          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table

Value of the data

User friendly method of smoke water preparation from potato and mustard crop residue as well as utilized for smoke water preparation from other plant species. The data can be used as a reference for analysis and application of crop residue smoke water in various sectors i.e. agriculture (plant hormone, pesticidal, fungicidal, bactericidal molecules), pharmaceutical (anesthetic, anti-allergic, antifungal, antibacterial, anti-oxidative molecules), chemical (free radical source, precursor molecules/main moiety of various chemicals and biochemicals, insecticides, plant hormones), etc. The dataset can be utilized for comparative analysis of different verities of potato and mustard crop residue smoke water.

Data

The dataset presented is comprised of three figures and two tables. Smoke water preparation method is briefly explained and presented in Fig. 1. Figs. 2 and 3 are MS spectrum of potato and mustard crop residue smoke water, respectively. Tables 1 and 2 are compounds present in potato and mustard crop residue smoke water analyzed and identified by LC-MS QTOF.
Fig. 1

Setup of smoke water preparation at farmer׳s field with house hold facility.

Fig. 2

Potato crop residue smoke water MS spectrum.

Fig. 3

Mustard crop residue smoke water MS spectrum.

Table 1

Potato crop residue smoke water LC-MS QTOF analysis.

Sr. no.NameFormulaMassRTHeightAreaCAS IDHMP IDKEGG IDLipid IDMETLIN ID
1Gallic acidC7H6O5170.02071.58523120,564149-91-7
2(R)-2,3-Dihydroxypropane-1-sulfonateC3H8O5S156.00981.60812,24474,589C1967573285
3Chromotropic acidC10H8O8S2319.96591.617312216,171148-25-4C1132368990
4AthidathionC8H15N2O4PS3329.99391.644334513,33319691-80-6C1896472723
56-HydroxypseudooxynicotineC10H14N2O2194.10542.31332078747C0129763885
6PinidineC9H17N139.13562.42915,305138,985501-02-0C1016568168
7DesethyletomidateC12H12N2O2216.08982.741697074,4357036-56-82645
84-Hydroxy-6-methylpyran-2-oneC6H6O3126.03162.7428227108,886675-10-5C0275244653
93-Methylbutyraldehyde oximeC5H11NO101.08422.78115,610117,162626-90-4C1725564529
108-Isoquinoline methanamineC11H11N157.0892.94936,106468,03545036
11Indole-3-acetaldoxime N-oxideC10H10N2O2190.0743.10414,927187,160C1720471605
12DMPOC6H11NO113.08383.15519,86589,6513317-61-164638
13PhentermineC10H15N149.12033.82518,082281,934C0743843308
14MuconicdialdehydeC6H6O2110.03725.133750946,826LMFA0600001136533
15N-(2-Methylpropyl)acetamideC6H13NO115.15.271672678,5161540-94-9HMDB3420389774
16N-(2-Methylpropyl)acetamideC6H13NO115.09966.13816,557171,4471540-94-9HMDB3420389774
17HarmalolC12H12N2O200.09456.41228,015503,8526028-07-5
18MephentermineC11H17N163.13597.53711,52392,6651212-72-2C0788943865
19MephentermineC11H17N163.13557.96321,465114,8761212-72-2C0788943865
20MephentermineC11H17N163.13558.06522,553156,5001212-72-2C0788943865
21N-MethylhexanamideC7H15NO129.11558.121865928,708C0272265819
221,2-Benzisothiazol-3(2H)-oneC7H5NOS151.00879.59547845,4642634-33-5HMDB3441389917
233-Nonyl-1H-pyrazoleC12H22N2194.177910.158827584,81572738-01-3HMDB3421089780
24Uzarigenin3-[xylosyl-(1->2)-rhamnoside]C34H52O12652.343610.619582735,513255861-29-1HMDB3629691441
25decanamideC10H21NO171.161911.31280419,186LMFA0801000546554
26N-(2,4-Eicosadienoyl)piperidineC25H45NO375.3511.639693739,53974267-84-8HMDB3200188108
27(5alpha,8beta,9beta)-5,9-Epoxy-3,6-megastigmadien-8-olC13H20O2208.146111.988487744,50669927-26-0HMDB3467290126
28PhytosphingosineC18H39NO3317.291812.42313,27283,749554-62-1HMDB04610C12144LMSP010300017066
29PhytosphingosineC18H39NO3317.29212.42313,27284,539554-62-1HMDB04610C12144LMSP010300017066
302-(3-Phenylpropyl)tetrahydrofuranC13H18O190.135712.701283615,0093208-40-0HMDB3617891327
31Convallasaponin AC32H52O9580.356413.4022604897019316-94-0C0889367250
32SphinganineC18H39NO2301.297913.71928,796239,988764-22-7HMDB00269C00836LMSP01020001395
33Nonoxynol-9C33H60O10616.417613.884636244,22443278
34SphinganineC18H39NO2301.297813.95858,150639,856764-22-7HMDB00269C00836LMSP01020001395
35N-(3E-hexadecenoyl)-deoxysphing-4-enine-1-sulfonateC34H65NO5S599.458614.287449949,718LMSP0000000353896
36DG(20:5(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)/0:0/20:5(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)) (d5)C43H59D5O5665.507516.888275618,892LMGL020103084683
373α,12α-Dihydroxy-5Î2-chol-8(14)-en-24-oic AcidC24H38O4390.277916.92915,185144,317C1537542809
38N,N-dimethyl-SafingolC20H43NO2329.328118.4524,988565,815LMSP0108005653956
393-hexanoyl-NBD CholesterolC39H58N4O5662.444223.45526,851275,83864806
Table 2

Mustard crop residue smoke water LC-MS QTOF analysis.

Sr. no.NameFormulaMassRTHeightAreaCAS IDHMP IDKEGG IDLipid IDMETLIN ID
1Methylthiobenzoic acidC8H8O2S168.02441.5811,78856,66513205-48-62538
2Gallic acidC7H6O5170.02091.58564929,649149-91-7
3(R)-2,3-Dihydroxypropane-1-sulfonateC3H8O5S156.01041.60814,047108,311C1967573285
4Bis(2-chloroethyl)etherC4H8Cl2O141.99471.616162,0101,088,726111-44-4C1468870262
5Chromotropic acidC10H8O8S2319.96591.617466428,833148-25-4C1132368990
6BenzocaineC9H11NO2165.07931.699564856,71794-09-7HMDB04992C075273934
7Dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP)C5H12O7P2246.00551.722738728,7041186-30-7C00235LMPR01010001372
84-Hydroxy-6-methylpyran-2-oneC6H6O3126.03242.242441617,620675-10-5C0275244653
9N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinoneC5H9NO99.06832.31323,246148,444872-50-4C1111868859
104-Hydroxy-6-methylpyran-2-oneC6H6O3126.03182.74212,895191,624675-10-5C0275244653
113-Methylbutyraldehyde oximeC5H11NO101.08422.78112,638132,453626-90-4C1725564529
122-Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acidC18H30O3S326.19362.85424,932304,808HMDB3103187362
13DMPOC6H11NO113.08393.15517,098281,7313317-61-164638
14CAY10638C16H13NO3S2331.03313.169409663,48364838
15PhentermineC10H15N149.12013.82513,703175,443C0743843308
16Lys Gln IleC17H33N5O5387.24674.01210,454178,18216610
17N-(2-Methylpropyl)acetamideC6H13NO115.09965.271401185321540-94-9HMDB3420389774
18N-(2-Methylpropyl)acetamideC6H13NO115.10026.138591936131540-94-9HMDB3420389774
19AzobenzeneC12H10N2182.08417.23517,093167,898103-33-3
20ArgArgGlnC17H34N10O5458.27187.30328,835257,60416788
21MephentermineC11H17N163.13587.53711,022115,9771212-72-2C0788943865
22MephentermineC11H17N163.13517.963845540,0111212-72-2C0788943865
23MephentermineC11H17N163.13518.06514,785141,0071212-72-2C0788943865
24N-MethylhexanamideC7H15NO129.11488.121391033,922C0272265819
258S-hydroxy-2E-Decene-4,6-diynoic acidC10H10O3178.06289.018688069,087LMFA0103071074311
262,5-Dimethoxycinnamic acidC11H12O4208.07349.205666569,74210538-51-9HMDB023706651
271,2-Benzisothiazol-3(2H)-oneC7H5NOS151.00869.59481536,7652634-33-5HMDB3441389917
28MonodesmethylpheniramineC15H18N2226.146810.204584633,50319428-44-51815
29Uzarigenin 3-[xylosyl-(1->2)-rhamnoside]C34H52O12652.34310.619719844,233255861-29-1HMDB3629691441
303׳-N-Acetyl-4׳-O-(10,12-octadecadienoyl)fusarochromanoneC35H52N2O6596.383510.628688933,735136536-84-0HMDB3856693237
31α-9(10)-EpODEC18H30O3294.219611.613361214,741LMFA0200003936039
32PhytosphingosineC18H39NO3317.291912.42319,293121,806554-62-1HMDB04610C12144LMSP010300017066
33PhytosphingosineC18H39NO3317.292212.42319,293121,806554-62-1HMDB04610C12144LMSP010300017066
34N-DesmethylselegilineC12H15N173.119812.45259713,54956862-28-3C154762402
352-(3-Phenylpropyl)tetrahydrofuranC13H18O190.135812.69702180,3993208-40-0HMDB3617891327
362-(3-Phenylpropyl)tetrahydrofuranC13H18O190.135812.701702180,3993208-40-0HMDB3617891327
37CurcumenolC15H22O2234.161713.21498326,060C1694271448
38Nonoxynol-9C33H60O10616.416613.88453,287430,26743278
39(25S)-5alpha-cholestan-3beta,6alpha,7beta,8beta,15alpha,16beta,26-heptolC27H48O7484.338513.94970,501558,307LMST0101032783928
40C22 SulfatideC46H89NO11S863.614714.11313,83483,819LMSP0602000941627
41PolidocanolC30H62O10582.433814.27843,576289,8873055-99-0C1349369582
42C24 SulfatideC48H93NO11S891.647415.211798147,459LMSP0602001341630
Setup of smoke water preparation at farmer׳s field with house hold facility. Potato crop residue smoke water MS spectrum. Mustard crop residue smoke water MS spectrum. Potato crop residue smoke water LC-MS QTOF analysis. Mustard crop residue smoke water LC-MS QTOF analysis.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Preparation of smoke water

Smoke water was prepared according to the method described previously [1] with modification in apparatus. Total 5 kg of crop residue of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) or Mustard (Brassica nigra) were collected and packed in air tight heating vessel, i.e. Pressure cooker of 5.0 L in size. Vapor outlet was replaced with rubber tube (1 mt in length with 10 mm diameter) on lid; other end of tube was immersed in 1 L of double distilled water as shown in Fig. 1. Vessel was heated on burner with full flame for 90 min to burn crop residue into smoke and smoke was collected in 1 L of double distilled water, remaining residue after burning weighted 1.45 kg.

LC-MS QTOF analysis

Chromatographic separation was achieved with Chromatographic system (Agilent Technologies, USA. Model: 6540) with column ZORBAX 300SB C-18, 4.6 × 100 mm 3.5 μm at 25 °C as the stationary phase. The method used a gradient at constant flow rate (0.6 mL min−1) combining solvent A (0.1% formic acid/water) and solvent B (acetonitrile), programmed as follows: 0 min, linear change from A–B (95:5 v/v) to A–B (5:95 v/v); 12 min, isocratic A–B (5:95 v/v); 20 min, linear change to A–B (95:5 v/v) 22 min and 25 min, linear change to A–B (95:5 v/v). The extract was injected a volume of 10 μL. Compounds of smoke water were identified using LC-MS-Quadrupled time of flight mass spectrometer. The parameters are presented in Table 3.
Table 3

QTOF condition Auto Ms/Ms mode.

Operating parametersValue
Ion ModePositive, ESI ionization mode
Drying Gas Temperature325 °C
Drying Gas flow10 L/min
Vaporize/sheath gas Temperature350 °C
Chamber4.23 µA
Capillary0.051 µA
Nebulizer45 psig
Fixed Collision Energies10, 20, 30, 40, 50 V
Precursor per cycle Max5
Precursor Threshold400 counts
Scan speed25,000 counts/spectrum
QTOF condition Auto Ms/Ms mode.
Subject AreaBiology
More specific subject areaAgricultural Biochemistry
Type of DataTable, Image and Graph
How data was acquiredLC-MS QTOF (Agilent Technologies, USA. Model: 6540)
Data formatRaw and analyzed Data
Experimental factorsSample was filtered through 0.2 µm filter
Experimental featuresSmoke water of potato and mustard crop residue was analyzed by standard LC-MS QTOF analysis
Data source locationSikariya Village (Sardarkrushinagar area) (24.327024 E, 72.295357 N), District Banaskantha, Gujarat, India
Data accessibilityData is within the article
Related research article[2]
  2 in total

1.  An effective system to produce smoke solutions from dried plant tissue for seed germination studies.

Authors:  Janice Coons; Nancy Coutant; Barbara Lawrence; Daniel Finn; Stephanie Finn
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis data of the major constituents of Ilex paraguariensis leaves by UPLC-PDA and QTOF-MS.

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Blum-Silva; Ana Beatriz Gobbo Luz; Marcus Vinicius P S Nascimento; Bruno Matheus de Campos Facchin; Bruna Baratto; Tânia Silvia Fröde; Louis Pergaud Sandjo; Eduardo Monguilhott Dalmarco; Flávio Henrique Reginatto
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-05-20
  2 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  An Interplay of Light and Smoke Compounds in Photoblastic Seeds.

Authors:  Renata Bączek-Kwinta
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  High affinity interaction of Solanum tuberosum and Brassica juncea residue smoke water compounds with proteins involved in coronavirus infection.

Authors:  Gaurav S Dave; Kalpna D Rakholiya; Mital J Kaneria; Bhemji P Galvadiya; Sudhanshu R Vyas; Vaktabhai H Kanbi; Manubhai P Patel
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 6.388

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.