Literature DB >> 30364324

A new genus of temperate woody bamboos (Poaceae, Bambusoideae, Arundinarieae) from a limestone montane area of China.

Yu-Xiao Zhang1, Peng-Fei Ma1,2, De-Zhu Li1,2.   

Abstract

Ampelocalamuscalcareus is a climbing and slender bamboo, known from south Guizhou, China. This species grows in broadleaved forests of limestone montane areas. Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that A.calcareus was sister to all other lineages of the tribe Arundinarieae rather than a member of Ampelocalamus. The morphological features and habitats of A.calcareus and related genera including Ampelocalamus, Drepanostachyum and Himalayacalamus were compared and discussed. The characteristics of the branch complements, nodes and foliage leaves distinguish A.calcareus from morphologically similar taxa. On the basis of molecular and morphological evidence, we propose to establish a new genus, Hsuehochloa, to accommodate A.calcareus and to honour the late Chinese bamboo taxonomist Chi-Ju Hsueh (Ji-Ru Xue). In addition, we describe the inflorescence of Hsuehochloa for the first time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ampelocalamus ; Hsuehochloa ; climbing bamboos; new genus

Year:  2018        PMID: 30364324      PMCID: PMC6195630          DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.109.27566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PhytoKeys        ISSN: 1314-2003            Impact factor:   1.635


Introduction

Temperate woody bamboos or the tribe (, ) comprise approximately 550 species in 31 genera (BPG 2012, Clark et al. 2015). They are mainly distributed in temperate to subtropical montane areas of East Asia (Ohrnberger 1999)PageBreak with China as the centre of species diversity (Li et al. 2006), but also in Southeast Asia, south India, Sri Lanka, North America and Africa. The recent plastid molecular phylogenetic results indicated that there were 12 major lineages in temperate woody bamboos, i.e. I. , II. , III. , IV. clade, V. clade, VI. clade, VII. , VIII. , IX. , X. , XI. and XII. . However, relationships amongst them remain largely uncertain (Triplett and Clark 2010, Zeng et al. 2010, Yang et al. 2013, Attigala et al. 2014, 2016, Ma et al. 2014, Zhang et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2017). Those lineages are strongly inconsistent with the morphological classification at the generic and subtribal levels (Keng and Wang 1996, Li 1997, 1999, Ohrnberger 1999). Most species and genera were nested within lineages IV, V and VI, while some lineages included only one species (lineages I, VIII, IX, X, XI). Lineages I and IX consisted of (Nees) Stapleton and (Handel-Mazzetti) D. Z. Li, Hsueh & N. H. Xia, respectively and Stapleton and D. Z. Li, Hsueh & N. H. Xia are both monotypic (Li et al. 1995, Stapleton 2013). Lineages VIII and X were formed by (Rendle) C. S. Chao & C. D. Chu and (Hance) Nakai, respectively, with as the lectotype of the genus Nakai. C. D. Chu & C. S. Chao (lineage XI) was recovered as the sister taxon to all the other temperate woody bamboos (Yang et al. 2013, Ma et al. 2014). The phylogenetic positions of the abovementioned five monotypic lineages have also obtained some support from nuclear gene trees (Zhang et al. 2012, Yang et al. 2013). Molecular phylogenetic results provide fresh perspectives for taxonomy, especially for lineages VIII, X and XI with only one species. Continuing to include these bamboos in the present genera renders these genera polyphyletic and causes problems when describing or citing them. In this paper, we propose to establish a new genus for based on morphological characters and previous molecular results. For the other two monotypic lineages (VIII and X), taxonomic revisions will be made in a separate paper.

Materials and methods

P. C. Keng and P. C. Keng are morphologically close to S. L. Chen, T. H. Wen & G. Y. Sheng (Li et al. 1996). These three genera all have pachymorph rhizomes, prominent or conspicuous nodal sheath scars and pendulous culms. Sometimes it is difficult to see the difference when only the vegetative features are available. Some species of were transferred from the genus (Keng and Wang 1996, Stapleton et al. 2005, Li et al. 2006) and several taxa of were combined into (Stapleton 1994). It is necessary to compare characters of with those two genera in order to clarify their morphological similarities and differences.

Specimen examination

The type specimen of was examined at the herbarium of Nanjing Forestry University (NF). We also examined specimens of , other species of , and at herbaria of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KUN), Nanjing University (N), Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (PE) and Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan Campus (SIFS) (specimens of N and PE were checked through the website http://www.cvh.ac.cn/).

Living plant observation

In 2010, one clump of was introduced by P. F. Ma and Z. M. Cai from Libo, Guizhou and cultivated at the greenhouse of the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species (GBOWS), Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming. This introduced clump flowered between 2012 and 2013. Unfortunately, the clump did not grow well and only a small piece of inflorescence was collected before it died. After fieldwork in early 2015, it was confirmed that the wild populations also flowered and died during the same period. More seedlings were introduced into the greenhouse of GBOWS at Kunming by C. Guo and Y. Guo in March 2015. They grew well in the greenhouse and became mature individuals after three years. Vegetative features including culms, culm sheaths, branch complements and foliage leaves were observed based on those individuals.

Morphological comparison

Four reproductive characters and 15 vegetative characters were selected and compared across , , and . For , the morphological data were observed and obtained based on herbarium specimens, living plants and literature. We observed and measured the structure of the inflorescence of by hand lens (30×) and stereomicroscope (Leica M166FC) without dissecting the spikelet due to the scarcity of materials. For the other genera, the morphological data were obtained from specimens and literature. The habitats of , , and were also compared based on literature.

Results

Morphological characteristics and habitat data are summarised in Table 1. and species of , and are all unicaespitose. Culms of are procumbent or scrambling, while culms of , and are pendulous or seldom scrambling. The characteristics of culm sheaths, internodes, branch complements, nodal sheath scars and foliage leaves are variable across , , and .
Table 1.

Comparison of morphological characters and habitats of (= ), , and .

Hsuehochloa Ampelocalamus Drepanostachyum Himalayacalamus
Clump formUnicaespitose, drooping, procumbent or scramblingUnicaespitose, pendulous or scramblingUnicaespitose, pendulousUnicaespitose, nodding to pendulous
Culm height (length)4–6 m3–10 m (usually 3–5 m)1.5–5.4 m (usually 2–3 m)2–9 m
Culm diameter4–5 mm5–15 (40) mm7–25 mm10–35 mm
InternodeTerete, densely white pubescent and white powdery, later subglabrousTerete, finely ridged, usually glabrousTerete, glabrousTerete, glabrous
Branch complementSolitary at the base, 3–7 at the middle and upper, subequalMany (less than 20), geniculate, central often dominantNumerous (15 to 80), verticillate, subequal, slenderMany (15 to 30), subequal, slender
Nodal sheath scarinconspicuousprominent, often with corky collarprominentprominent
Culm sheath1/2 as long as the internode, persistent, densely white pubescent abaxially, glabrescentShorter than the internode, deciduous, often sparsely setose abaxiallyLonger or shorter than the internode, deciduous or persistent, glabrous or sparsely setose abaxially, adaxially scabrous apicallyLonger or shorter than the internode, deciduous, glabrous or seldom setose abaxially
Culm sheath auricleFalcate, amplexicaulAbsent or minute (A.actinotrichus with prominent auricles)AbsentAbsent
Culm sheath oral setaeSeveral, radiateAbsent except A.actinotrichusAbsentAbsent
Culm sheath bladeOvate-lanceolate, reflexedLinear, linear-lanceolate, lanceolate, ovate-lanceolate, erect or reflexedSubulate or linear, erect or reflexedSubulate or linear, erect or reflexed, readily deciduous
Leaf number of the ultimate branch2–53–113–53–7
Leaf sheathGlabrousGlabrous or pubescentGlabrousGlabrous
Leaf auricleFalcateAbsent or presentAbsent or minuteAbsent or minute
Leaf oral setaeSeveral, radiateRadiate when presentAbsent or presentAbsent or present
Leaf bladeLeathery, glabrousPapery, glabrous or pubescentPapery, glabrousPapery, glabrous or abaxial midrib hairy proximally
InflorescenceRacemesPaniclesPaniclesRacemes
No. of florets per spikelet52–72–61 or 2
Stamen3, anthers purple3, anthers yellow3, anthers yellow3, anthers yellow
Stigma2, plumose2, plumose2, plumose2, plumose
HabitatLimestone montane areas, alt. 500–950 mBroad-leaved forests, stony slopes (limestone, granite or basalt), riverside slopes, alt. 200–1800 mSlopes, coniferous and broadleaf mixed forests, 1300–3200 mTemperate forests, 1200–3000 m
The inflorescence of is semelauctant and racemose. The spikelet has five florets and the floret possesses a purple-green lemma (ca. 1 cm long), palea shorter than the lemma (ca. 0.8 cm long), three purple stamens (4 mm long) and two plumose stigmas. The inflorescence of , and has been described in detail in other literature (e.g. Stapleton 1994, Li et al. 2006), therefore, we only list some key features in Table 1. Analysis of the habitat data demonstrates that mainly occurs under broadleaved forests of limestone areas below 1000 m; other species grow under broadleaved forests, on stony slopes (limestone, granite or basalt) and riverside slopes usually from 200 m to 1800 m alt.; taxa of are usually distributed under coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests from 1300 m to 3200 m alt.; species of occur under temperate forests from 1200 m to 3000 m alt. (Table 1).

Discussion

was described by Chao and Chu (1983) based on vegetative specimens. This species has pachymorph rhizomes with short necks and apically drooping culms (Fig. 1) that are similar to other species of the genus , especially to the type species (Merrill & Chun) S. L. Chen, T. H. Wen & G. Y. Sheng. Moreover, the conspicuous auricles and radiate oral setae on the culm sheath and leaf sheath are similar to as well. However, characteristics of nodes, branch complements and leaf blades are quite different from . has inconspicuous nodal sheath scars, a solitary branch at the base and 3–7 subequal branches at the middle and upper parts of the culm and leathery leaf blades. Other taxa in usually possess prominent nodal sheath scars with a corky collar, many branches with a central dominant one that may replace the culm and papery leaf blades. Branches at the nodes of are long (50–100 cm), pendulous and nearly as thick as the culm, which makes culms scrambling or procumbent. There are also some other vegetative features that can distinguish from typical species, as summarised in Table 1.
Figure 1.

. A, B Habit and habitat C Clump D Young culm with white pubescence E, F Branch complement G Culm sheath H Leaves I Inflorescence J Floret (A–D, G from P. F. Ma & Z. M. Cai 10050E, F, H from seedlings introduced from Libo, Guizhou, China I, J from P. F. Ma s.n). Scale bars: 5 cm (A–C); 0.5 cm (D, G); 2 cm (E, F); 1 cm (H, I); 1mm (J).

Culms of and are distally pendulous, but not scrambling, which is different from . Branches on mid-culms of and are usually more than 15 in number and subequal without a central dominant one, while has no more than 10 subequal branches. Culm sheaths of and are usually deciduous and glabrous abaxially, whereas culm sheaths of are persistent and densely white pubescent abaxially. has conspicuous auriPageBreakPageBreakcles and oral setae on culm sheaths and leaf sheaths and ovate-lanceolate culm blades, while auricles and oral setae are often absent and culm blades are subulate or linear in and . Due to the incomplete nature of the flowering material (Fig. 1), the description and comparison provided in Table 1 may not be fully accurate for healthy individuals flowering in the wild. The type of inflorescence of is similar to (racemose); the number of florets per spikelet is similar to and (5 vs. 2–7); they all have three stamens and two plumose stigmas, but the anther colour of is purple while anthers are yellow in , and . Through comparison of morphological characters, we conclude that morphologically resembles species of , and in its pachymorph rhizomes and is especially similar to in its climbing habit. However, the branch complements and the characteristics of its nodes, culm sheaths and foliage leaves can distinguish this species from all taxa in these three genera. The inflorescence of is also similar to these three genera (on the basis of our incomplete material) in its semelauctant structure, the presence of three stamens and two stigmas. Molecular phylogenetic studies indicated that , and had a close relationship in nuclear gene based phylogenies, although only limited taxa of those genera were sampled (Yang et al. 2013). Nonetheless, was sister to all the other taxa of the tribe in plastid and nuclear gene trees (Yang et al. 2013, Ma et al. 2014, Attigala et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2016). The morphological similarity between the distantly related and those three genera (, and ) demonstrated that morphological characters had undergone complex evolutionary trajectories in those taxa and also in the whole tribe and some important features in bamboo taxonomy were homoplastic or convergent that was illustrated in other studies of and some tropical woody bamboos (Yang et al. 2008, Tyrrell et al. 2012, Attigala et al. 2016). The habitat and altitude of are more similar to other typical species of than they are to and (Table 1). Based on the above analysis of morphology, molecular phylogenetic relationships and habitat, we propose to establish a new genus to accommodate . . A, B Habit and habitat C Clump D Young culm with white pubescence E, F Branch complement G Culm sheath H Leaves I Inflorescence J Floret (A–D, G from P. F. Ma & Z. M. Cai 10050E, F, H from seedlings introduced from Libo, Guizhou, China I, J from P. F. Ma s.n). Scale bars: 5 cm (A–C); 0.5 cm (D, G); 2 cm (E, F); 1 cm (H, I); 1mm (J). Comparison of morphological characters and habitats of (= ), , and .

Taxonomic treatment

D. Z. Li & Y. X. Zhang gen. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77190833-1

Diagnosis.

resembles genera , and , but differs from those genera by its thin culms (4–5 mm), fewer branches in each branch complement (1, 3–7), inconspicuous nodal sheath scar, falcate auricles and leathery foliage leaves.

Type.

(C. D. Chu & C. S. Chao) D. Z. Li & Y. X. Zhang, comb. nov. (77190834-1) Basionym. C. D. Chu & C. S. Chao, Acta Phytotax. Sin. 21: 204–206. 1983. Type: CHINA, Guizhou, Libo, 500 m, C. D. Chu, C. S. Chao, J. Q. Zhang & K. M. Lan 81018 (holotype, NF!; isotype, PE!)

Description.

Rhizomes pachymorph. Culms caespitose, apically drooping, procumbent or scrambling, 4–6 m long, 4–5 mm in diameter, internodes terete, 8–18 cm long, densely white pubescent initially at the upper part, later subglabrous; nodes and sheath scars inconspicuous. Branch complements with one branch proximally and 3–7 branches apically, branches 0.5–1 m long, slender, subequal. Culm sheaths persistent, 1/2 as long as internodes, densely white pubescent, glabrescent, margins densely white ciliate; auricles falcate, amplexicaul; oral setae many, radiate, ca. 1 cm; ligule short, apex densely white fimbriate; blade reflexed, green, ovate-lanceolate. Foliage leaves 2–5 per ultimate branch; sheaths glabrous, glossy, margins ciliate; auricles present; oral setae deciduous, radiate, 5–7 mm; ligule short, apex long, white ciliate; blade 7–20 × 1.2–3 cm, thinly leathery, abaxially slightly glaucous, glabrous on both surfaces, secondary veins indistinct, 4–7 pairs. Inflorescence imperfectly known, semelauctant, racemose possibly with 1 or few spikelets; glumes not seen; florets 5; lemma ca. 1 cm long, purple green; palea ca. 0.8 cm long; lodicules not seen; stamens 3, anthers purple, 4 mm long; ovary and style not seen; stigmas 2, plumose.

Etymology.

was named in honour of the late Prof. Chi-Ju Hsueh (Ji-Ru Xue in transliteration) (1921–1999), a pioneer Chinese botanist on bamboos of SW China and mentor of the senior author in 1983–1986. Hsueh stands for his family name and chloa means grass.

Distribution and habitat.

Endemic to south Guizhou, China, under broadleaved forests in a limestone montane area at 500–950 m altitude.

Additional specimens examined.

CHINA. Guizhou: Libo, 950 m alt., May 1982, X. H. Song 919 (NF), J. P. Ruan 90041 (N), 600–700 m alt., November 6 2006, T. P. Yi 06093 & 06094 (SIFS), 679 m alt., , 14 April 2010, P. F. Ma & Z. M. Cai 10050 (KUN), 653 m alt., , 28 March 2015, C. Guo & Y. Guo GC 82 (KUN), 667 m alt., , 16 May 2015, X. Y. Ye & M. Y. Zhou YXY190 (KUN).Yunnan (Kunming): cultivated in the greenhouse of GBOWS, Kunming, 1900 m alt., January 2013, P. F. Ma s.n. (KUN).
  9 in total

1.  Complex evolution in Arundinarieae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae): incongruence between plastid and nuclear GBSSI gene phylogenies.

Authors:  Yu-Xiao Zhang; Chun-Xia Zeng; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Molecular phylogeny of the arthrostylidioid bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Bambuseae: Arthrostylidiinae) and new genus Didymogonyx.

Authors:  Christopher D Tyrrell; Ana Paula Santos-Gonçalves; Ximena Londoño; Lynn G Clark
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Large multi-locus plastid phylogeny of the tribe Arundinarieae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) reveals ten major lineages and low rate of molecular divergence.

Authors:  Chun-Xia Zeng; Yu-Xiao Zhang; Jimmy K Triplett; Jun-Bo Yang; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Multi-locus plastid phylogenetic biogeography supports the Asian hypothesis of the temperate woody bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae).

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Zhang; Chun-Xia Zeng; Peng-Fei Ma; Thomas Haevermans; Yu-Xiao Zhang; Li-Na Zhang; Zhen-Hua Guo; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Phylogenetic estimation and morphological evolution of Arundinarieae (Bambusoideae: Poaceae) based on plastome phylogenomic analysis.

Authors:  Lakshmi Attigala; William P Wysocki; Melvin R Duvall; Lynn G Clark
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Chloroplast phylogenomic analyses resolve deep-level relationships of an intractable bamboo tribe Arundinarieae (poaceae).

Authors:  Peng-Fei Ma; Yu-Xiao Zhang; Chun-Xia Zeng; Zhen-Hua Guo; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  The monophyly of Chimonocalamus and conflicting gene trees in Arundinarieae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) inferred from four plastid and two nuclear markers.

Authors:  Hong-Mei Yang; Yu-Xiao Zhang; Jun-Bo Yang; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  A molecular phylogenetic and fruit evolutionary analysis of the major groups of the paleotropical woody bamboos (Gramineae: Bambusoideae) based on nuclear ITS, GBSSI gene and plastid trnL-F DNA sequences.

Authors:  Han-Qi Yang; Jun-Bo Yang; Zhen-Hua Peng; Jian Gao; Yu-Ming Yang; Sheng Peng; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Bergbambos and Oldeania, new genera of African bamboos (Poaceae, Bambusoideae).

Authors:  Chris M A Stapleton
Journal:  PhytoKeys       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.635

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic position of Thamnocalamus unispiculatus (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Arundinarieae).

Authors:  Weihua Wang; Shiyu Lv; Li Liu; Yuanyan Meng; Xiaolong Zhang; Xiaying Ye
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 0.610

2.  Parallel ddRAD and Genome Skimming Analyses Reveal a Radiative and Reticulate Evolutionary History of the Temperate Bamboos.

Authors:  Cen Guo; Peng-Fei Ma; Guo-Qian Yang; Xia-Ying Ye; Ying Guo; Jing-Xia Liu; Yun-Long Liu; Deren A R Eaton; Zhen-Hua Guo; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.