Literature DB >> 30363998

Laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for low rectal cancer through marker meeting approach.

Xuefei Yang1, Guixi Zhang1, Li Jiang1, Hao Zhang1, Zhihai Liu1, Jingsi Liu1, Yang Deng1, Kai Pan2, Joe King Man Fan1,3.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) with sphincter preservation for ultra-low rectal cancer is always a challenging operation in colorectal surgery. To achieve negative margins, reducing the difficulty and risks of the procedure are major goals for us. The marker meeting approach we reported can help to accomplish this goal. The key technique for the marker meeting approach is to ensure a clear distal margin in a low resection of the rectum by transanal dissection. This procedure allows access to the space around the distal rectum and mesorectum and to pack the gauzes in the distal part of the space as a landmark. Routine laparoscopic LAR was performed to dissect the space until reaching the gauzes packed above and achieve complete mobilization of the rectum and mesorectum. This surgical procedure is simpler and reduces the difficulty of the operation. Therefore, it is expected to reduce the risk of surgery-related complications and positive margins and is suitable to be widely applied and extended in clinical practice. The short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of the marker meeting approach need more research in large samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low rectal cancer; laparoscopic low anterior resection (laparoscopic LAR); marker meeting; total mesorectal excision (TME)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30363998      PMCID: PMC6186979          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  21 in total

1.  Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Richard Billingham; Ellen Farrokhi; Michael Florence; Daniel Herzig; Karen Horvath; Terry Rogers; Scott Steele; Rebecca Symons; Richard Thirlby; Mark Whiteford; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; S Biondo; E Espin; P Parrilla; H Ortiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Alessandro Salvai; Simone Arolfo; Marco Ettore Allaix; Guido Schwarzer; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study.

Authors:  Nicholas J Battersby; Peter How; Brendan Moran; Sigmar Stelzner; Nicholas P West; Graham Branagan; Joachim Strassburg; Philip Quirke; Paris Tekkis; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Mark Gudgeon; Bill Heald; Gina Brown
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Transanal single-port laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Zhang; Y-S Zhang; X-W Jin; M-Z Li; J-S Fan; Z-H Yang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  M Pędziwiatr; P Małczak; M Mizera; J Witowski; G Torbicz; P Major; M Pisarska; M Wysocki; A Budzyński
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

9.  No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Joël Leroy; Brian Donncha Barry; Armando Melani; Didier Mutter; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 10.  Timing of surgery after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jake D Foster; Emma L Jones; Stephen Falk; Edwin J Cooper; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

1.  Critical surgical errors by junior fellows and trainees in low rectal cancer surgery: How to overcome?(A cross-sectional study).

Authors:  Yasser Elghamrini; Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan; Karim Sabry Abdel Samee; Ahmed Aly Khalil
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.