Literature DB >> 15722285

Reliability of stress radiography for evaluation of posterior knee laxity.

Martin S Schulz1, Kai Russe, Georgios Lampakis, Michael J Strobel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although stress radiography has been recommended for quantifying posterior tibial displacement in knees with posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, the intratester reliability and intertester reliability of this measurement method have not been evaluated. HYPOTHESIS: Stress radiography is a reproducible measurement method in the assessment of posterior knee laxity in patients with posterior cruciate ligament lesions. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Stress radiographs of 787 patients with suspected posterior cruciate ligament lesions taken using the Telos device were evaluated independently by 3 testers: 2 of the testers were clinically experienced in the evaluation of stress radiographs, and 1 tester was a novice tester. Change in mean, standard error of measurement with calculated confidence intervals, and intra-class correlation coefficients were determined to assess intratester and intertester reliability.
RESULTS: There was no significant intratester change in mean. Intratester standard error of measurement was 1.03 mm; 95% confidence intervals were+/-2.02 mm for a single measurement and+/-2.86 mm for a change in measurement. The intratester intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.95. Intertester reliability revealed a significant change in mean between the experienced testers and the novice tester (P<.001). There was no substantial difference for the standard error of measurement of each tester. The mean intertester standard error of measurement was 1.41 mm; 95% confidence intervals were+/-2.77 mm for a single measurement and+/-3.91 mm for a change in measurement. The intertester intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91.
CONCLUSION: Stress radiography was found to be a measurement method with a useful reliability for evaluation of posterior laxity in patients with posterior cruciate ligament lesions. The reproducibility of stress radiography may be influenced by multiple variables, and standardized methods are needed to minimize measurement error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15722285     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504269723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  25 in total

1.  Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques.

Authors:  Tobias M Jung; Carsten Reinhardt; Sven U Scheffler; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Technical note: MRI device for active stress of the knee. The practical approach and preliminary data.

Authors:  A Bellelli; P Mancini; M Artico; C Miglietta
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Rolimeter measurements are suitable as substitutes to stress radiographs in the evaluation of posterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Jürgen Höher; Ralph Akoto; Philip Helm; Sven Shafizadeh; Bertil Bouillon; Maurice Balke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Stress radiography for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Evan W James; Brady T Williams; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

6.  The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  O G Sørensen; K Larsen; B W Jakobsen; S Kold; T B Hansen; M Lind; K Søballe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Arthroscopic Transtibial PCL Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Shin; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

8.  An analysis of normative data on the knee rotatory profile and the usefulness of the Rotatometer, a new instrument for measuring tibiofemoral rotation: the reliability of the knee Rotatometer.

Authors:  Ju Hwan Chung; Keun Jung Ryu; Dong Hoon Lee; Kyung Ho Yoon; Yang Woo Park; Hyung Jong Kim; Jae Hwa Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A new measurement technique for the tibiofemoral contact point in normal knees and knees with TKR.

Authors:  R J de Jong; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  No influence of coronal laxity and alignment on lift-off after well-balanced and aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Satoshi Hamai; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Takeshi Shimoto; Hidehiko Higaki; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.