Literature DB >> 30360961

African American Living Donors' Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study.

Elisa J Gordon1, Daniela Amόrtegui2, Isaac Blancas2, Catherine Wicklund3, John Friedewald4, Richard R Sharp5.   

Abstract

RATIONALE &
OBJECTIVE: African American live kidney donors ("donors") have a greater risk for kidney failure than European American donors. Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants in African Americans may be associated with this disparity. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed-methods design. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: African American donors at 1 transplantation center. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Semistructured interviews assessed attitudes about APOL1 genetic testing, willingness to undergo APOL1 testing, hypothetical decisions about donating with 2 APOL1 variants, and demographics. Surveys assessed perceptions of ethnic identity and genetics knowledge. Interview transcriptions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: 23 donors participated in semistructured interviews. Most (96%) reported that transplantation centers should routinely offer APOL1 genetic testing to all African American potential donors. Most (87%) would have been willing to undergo APOL1 testing before donating. Although study participants noted that APOL1 testing may deter African American potential donors from donating, most (61%) would have donated even if they had 2 high-risk APOL1 variants. Several themes emerged. Study participants believed that APOL1 testing was beneficial for providing information to help donors make informed donation decisions. Participants expressed concern about APOL1 variants placing donors at harm for kidney failure, and therefore valued taking preventive health measures. Participants believed that potential donors would experience psychological distress from learning that they have 2 gene variants and could harm their recipients. Participants were apprehensive about insurance coverage and costs of APOL1 testing and feared that APOL1 genetic test results could discriminate against African Americans. LIMITATIONS: Findings may not be generalizable to African American potential donors.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that African American donors support APOL1 genetic testing yet fear that APOL1 variants and genetic testing could adversely affect donors' health and ethnic identity. Transplantation centers using APOL1 genetic testing should address African American donors' concerns about APOL1 genetic testing to optimize future donors' informed consent practices.
Copyright © 2018 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American; apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1); cultural identity; ethics; ethnicity; genetic testing; health disparities; informed consent; kidney transplantation; living donation; medical decision making; qualitative research; sociocultural

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30360961      PMCID: PMC6252162          DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  42 in total

1.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

2.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Facilitating Education about Live Kidney Donation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Jane C Tan; Elisa J Gordon; Mary Amanda Dew; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Robert W Steiner; E Steve Woodle; Rebecca Hays; James R Rodrigue; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  African American living-kidney donors should be screened for APOL1 risk alleles.

Authors:  David M Cohen; Anuja Mittalhenkle; David L Scott; Carlton J Young; Douglas J Norman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics.

Authors:  J S Roberts; K D Christensen; R C Green
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Integrating APOL1 Gene Variants Into Renal Transplantation: Considerations Arising From the American Society of Transplantation Expert Conference.

Authors:  K A Newell; R N Formica; J S Gill; J D Schold; J S Allan; S H Covington; A C Wiseman; A Chandraker
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 8.  Health outcomes among non-Caucasian living kidney donors: knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.782

9.  Association between temporal orientation and attitudes about BRCA1/2 testing among women of African descent with family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tiffany A Edwards; Hayley S Thompson; Naa Oyo A Kwate; Karen Brown; Margaret M McGovern; Andrea Forman; Nidhi Kapil-Pair; Lina Jandorf; Dana H Bovbjerg; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-05-13

10.  Associations between self-referral and health behavior responses to genetic risk information.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Sharon Lr Kardia; Colleen M McBride; Erin Linnenbringer; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Practical Considerations for APOL1 Genotyping in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation.

Authors:  Alejandra M Mena-Gutierrez; Amber M Reeves-Daniel; Colleen L Jay; Barry I Freedman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Impact of education on APOL1 testing attitudes among prospective living kidney donors.

Authors:  Jordan G Nestor; Amber J Li; Kristen L King; S Ali Husain; Tristan J McIntosh; Deirdre Sawinski; Ana S Iltis; Melody S Goodman; Heidi A Walsh; James M DuBois; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.456

3.  Integrating APOL1 Kidney-risk Variant Testing in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation: An Expert Panel Opinion.

Authors:  Mona D Doshi; Elisa J Gordon; Barry I Freedman; Craig Glover; Jayme E Locke; Christie P Thomas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Diagnosis, Education, and Care of Patients with APOL1-Associated Nephropathy: A Delphi Consensus and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Wylie Burke; Jasmin Divers; Lucy Eberhard; Crystal A Gadegbeku; Rasheed Gbadegesin; Michael E Hall; Tiffany Jones-Smith; Richard Knight; Jeffrey B Kopp; Csaba P Kovesdy; Keith C Norris; Opeyemi A Olabisi; Glenda V Roberts; John R Sedor; Erika Blacksher
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 14.978

5.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants.

Authors:  Kathleen M West; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Erika Blacksher; Stephanie M Fullerton; Ebele M Umeukeje; Bessie Young; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 6.  At the Research-Clinical Interface: Returning Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.

Authors:  Kathleen M West; Erika Blacksher; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Stephanie M Fullerton; Ebele M Umeukeje; Bessie A Young; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Variation of ApoL1 Testing Practices for Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Tristan McIntosh; Sumit Mohan; Deirdre Sawinski; Ana Iltis; James M DuBois
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.187

8.  Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Berrigan; Jasmine Austrie; Aaron Fleishman; Kenneth P Tercyak; Martin R Pollak; Martha Pavlakis; Vinayak Rohan; Prabhakar K Baliga; Liise K Kayler; Thomas H Feeley; James R Rodrigue
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Apolipoprotein L1: role in the evaluation of kidney transplant donors.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network (APOLLO): Design and Rationale.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Marva M Moxey-Mims; Amir A Alexander; Brad C Astor; Kelly A Birdwell; Donald W Bowden; Gordon Bowen; Jonathan Bromberg; Timothy E Craven; Darshana M Dadhania; Jasmin Divers; Mona D Doshi; Elling Eidbo; Alessia Fornoni; Michael D Gautreaux; Rasheed A Gbadegesin; Patrick O Gee; Giselle Guerra; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Ana S Iltis; Nichole Jefferson; Bruce A Julian; David K Klassen; Patrick P Koty; Carl D Langefeld; Krista L Lentine; Lijun Ma; Roslyn B Mannon; Madhav C Menon; Sumit Mohan; J Brian Moore; Barbara Murphy; Kenneth A Newell; Jonah Odim; Mariella Ortigosa-Goggins; Nicholette D Palmer; Meyeon Park; Afshin Parsa; Stephen O Pastan; Emilio D Poggio; Nishadi Rajapakse; Amber M Reeves-Daniel; Sylvia E Rosas; Laurie P Russell; Deirdre Sawinski; S Carrie Smith; Mitzie Spainhour; Robert J Stratta; Matthew R Weir; David M Reboussin; Paul L Kimmel; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.