| Literature DB >> 30360489 |
James S Lee1, Avril A B Robertson2, Matthew A Cooper3, Kiarash Khosrotehrani4.
Abstract
The incidence of chronic wounds is escalating, and the associated healing process is especially problematic in an aging population with increased morbidity. Targeting increased inflammation in chronic wounds is a promising but challenging therapeutic strategy. Indeed, inflammation and especially macrophages are required for wound healing. As the NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated with various other inflammatory diseases, in this study, we used MCC950-a selective NLRP3 small molecule inhibitor-on murine models of both acute and chronic wounds. This molecule, while tested for other inflammatory conditions, has never been investigated to reduce topical inflammation driving chronic wounds. We found that there were no significant differences when the treatment was applied either topically or orally in wild-type C57Bl/6 mice and that it even impaired wound healing in obese mice. The treatment was also unable to improve re-epithelialisation or angiogenesis, which are both required for the closure of wounds. We are inclined to believe that MCC950 may inhibit the closure of chronic wounds and that it does not alter wound-associated macrophage polarisation.Entities:
Keywords: MCC950; NLRP3; chronic wound healing; small molecule inhibition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30360489 PMCID: PMC6274704 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1MCC950 appears to inhibit wound closure in diabetic mice when administered topically. (a) Comparing topically applied MCC950 vs. control, there was no significant difference in the rate of wound closure. (b) Representative photographs of wound closure on C57Bl/6 mice. (c) Comparing topical administration of MCC950 vs. control on obese mice with chronic wounds, the control mice had improved wound healing at D5 compared to MCC950. (d) Representative photographs of wound closure on Ob/Ob mice. (e) Histogram comparing re-epithelialisation between MCC950 and controls in Ob/Ob mice at D5 using keratin-14 staining. (f) Representative photomicrograph showing epithelial migration stained with keratin-14 (red) over the wound bed, stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). The last hair follicle before the opening of the wound (green arrows) was used to determine how far the epithelium had migrated along the wound bed (white arrows). N.s. = Not significant.
Figure 2MCC950 does not alter wound associated macrophage populations. (a) Representative photomicrograph of macrophages stained with F4/80 (green). (b) iNOS to stain for M1 macrophages (red). (c) MRC1 to stain for M2 macrophages (purple). (d) A merged image of all antibodies plus DAPI for nuclear staining (blue). (e) No significant difference in M1 macrophage percentage between control and treated groups. (f) No significant difference in M2 macrophage percentage between control and treated groups. Error bars = SD. N.s. = Not significant. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 3Oral administration of MCC950 does not significantly improve chronic wound healing. (a) Comparing orally administered MCC950 to control, there was no significant difference in the rate of macroscopic wound healing. (b) Representative photographs of wound closure on Ob/Ob mice. (c) Histogram comparing wound re-epithelialisation at D14 between groups using keratin-14 immunofluorescent staining. (d) Histogram comparing endothelial area between groups at D14 using CD31 immunofluorescent staining.