| Literature DB >> 30359366 |
L Bosmans1, M I Pozo2, C Verreth1, S Crauwels1, L Wilberts1, I S Sobhy1,3, F Wäckers4,5, H Jacquemyn2, B Lievens1.
Abstract
Gut microbial communities are critical for the health of many insect species. However, little is known about how gut microbial communities respond to anthropogenic changes and how such changes affect host-pathogen interactions. In this study, we used deep sequencing to investigate and compare the composition of gut microbial communities within the midgut and ileum (both bacteria and fungi) in Bombus terrestris queens collected from natural (forest) and urbanized habitats. Additionally, we investigated whether the variation in gut microbial communities under each habitat affected the prevalence of two important bumblebee pathogens that have recently been associated with Bombus declines (Crithidia bombi and Nosema bombi). Microbial community composition differed strongly among habitat types, both for fungi and bacteria. Fungi were almost exclusively associated with bumblebee queens from the forest habitats, and were not commonly detected in bumblebee queens from the urban sites. Further, gut bacterial communities of urban B. terrestris specimens were strongly dominated by bee-specific core bacteria like Snodgrassella (Betaproteobacteria) and Gilliamella (Gammaproteobacteria), whereas specimens from the forest sites contained a huge fraction of environmental bacteria. Pathogen infection was very low in urban populations and infection by Nosema was only observed in specimens collected from forest habitats. No significant relationship was found between pathogen prevalence and microbial gut diversity. However, there was a significant and negative relationship between prevalence of Nosema and relative abundance of the core resident Snodgrassella, supporting its role in pathogen defense. Overall, our results indicate that land-use change may lead to different microbial gut communities in bumblebees, which may have implications for bumblebee health, survival and overall fitness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30359366 PMCID: PMC6201867 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mean diversity measures (± standard error of the mean) of the gut microbiome (midgut and ileum) of the bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris) investigated in this study.
| Sampling site | Habitat type | n | Observed OTU richness ( | Chao1 | Coverage | Shannon-Wiener ( | Transformed | Evenness ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | S1-F | Natural area | 8 of 8 | 241 ± 176 A | 242.8 ± 175.5 A | 98.5 ± 2.9 | 2.32 ± 1.58 | 25.03 ± 30.42 A | 0.42 ± 0.24 A |
| S2-F | Natural area | 10 of 10 | 238 ± 49 A | 239.3 ± 48.8 A | 99.3 ± 1.3 | 2.88 ± 1.71 | 48.90 ± 53.87 A | 0.52 ± 0.31 A | |
| S3-U | Urbanized area | 10 of 10 | 66 ± 33 B | 90.6 ± 45.9 B | 79.0 ± 24.9 | 1.79 ± 0.77 | 7.53 ± 4.69 B | 0.43 ± 0.15 A | |
| S4-U | Urbanized area | 10 of 10 | 48 ± 45 B | 57.8 ± 44.1 B | 80.5 ± 23.0 | 0.88 ± 0.26 | 2.48 ± 0.65 B | 0.27 ± 0.05 B | |
| S5-U | Urbanized area | 10 of 10 | 53 ± 40 B | 62.8 ± 35.6 B | 79.0 ± 19.8 | 1.03 ± 0.23 | 2.86 ± 0.65 B | 0.28 ± 0.0 B | |
| Fungi | S1-F | Natural area | 8 of 8 | 15 ± 9 A | 15.9 ± 10.1 A | 98.1 ± 3.7 | 1.40 ± 0.60 | 1.40 ± 0.60 A | 0.39 ± 0.17 A |
| S2-F | Natural area | 10 of 10 | 31 ± 4 B | 33.9 ± 5.3 B | 93.1 ± 8.6 | 1.83 ± 0.74 | 1.83 ± 0.74 B | 0.52 ± 0.21 A | |
| S3-U | Urbanized area | 2 of 10 | 22 ± 6 B | 25.9 ± 8.9 C | 87.9 ± 16.3 | 1.17 ± 0.64 | 1.17 ± 0.64 C | 0.45 ± 0.04 A | |
| S4-U | Urbanized area | 0 of 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| S5-U | Urbanized area | 0 of 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
a Different letters indicate significant differences (mixed model analysis; P < 0.05). Data for bacteria and fungi were analyzed separately.
b Number of individuals included in the analysis.
c Coverage = (Observed OTU richness/Chao1)*100%.
Fig 1Means (n = 2) of log-transformed numbers of bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS-2 copies in the midgut and ileum region per specimen.
Bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris) were collected from five different locations, representing two habitat types, including forest (S1-F and S2-F) and urbanized habitats (S3-U, S4-U and S5-U). No bars represent concentrations below the limit of detection (100 copies).
Fig 2Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of the gut bacterial (A) (stress value = 0.16) and fungal community composition (B) (stress value = 0.21) of . Sampled locations represent two habitat types, including forest (S1-F (yellow) and S2-F (orange)) and urbanized habitats (S3-U (purple), S4-U (dark blue) and S5-U (light blue)). The distance between different points on the plot reflects their similarity level: the more similar the communities, the smaller the distance between the points.
Fig 3Gut bacterial community composition at the level of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) within the midgut and ileum in bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris) from five different locations.
Sampled locations represent two habitat types, including forest (S1-F and S2-F) and urbanized habitats (S3-U, S4-U and S5-U). Only the most abundant OTUs (i.e. with a mean sequence relative abundance > 1% over the entire dataset) are represented in the figure.
Mean relative abundance and prevalence of previously described core bacteria in the midgut-ileum region of Bombus terrestris queens collected from five different locations, including two forest (S1-F and S2-F) and three urbanized habitats (S3-U, S4-U and S5-U).
| OTU | Phylum | Family | Species | Name OTU in literature | Core in | S1-F | S2-F | S3-U | S4-U | S5-U | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rel. | Present in host ( | Rel. ab. (%) | Present | Rel. ab. (%) | Present | Rel. ab. (%) | Present | Rel. ab. (%) | Present in host ( | ||||||
| 24 | Actinobacteria | Bifido-3 | Core | 0.07 | 4 | 0.00 | 0 | 2.01 | 2 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | ||
| 38 | Bifido-2 | Core | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 1.16 | 2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.04 | 5 | |||
| 231 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | |||||
| 786 | Bifido-1 | Core | 0.01 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.001 | 1 | |||
| 6 | Firmicutes | Firm-4/Lacto-2 | Core | 0.02 | 2 | 0.02 | 4 | 2.86 | 7 | 0.96 | 2 | 9.09 | 6 | ||
| 20 | Lacto-5 | Core | 0.01 | 3 | 0.02 | 3 | 2.02 | 4 | 1.18 | 3 | 1.44 | 8 | |||
| 23 | Firm-5/Lacto-1 | Core | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 4 | 0.06 | 2 | 2.32 | 3 | 0.92 | 6 | |||
| 37 | Lacto-4 | Core | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.78 | 2 | 0.00 | 0 | |||
| 136 | 0.03 | 4 | 0.05 | 5 | 0.001 | 2 | 0.004 | 3 | 0.00 | 0 | |||||
| 189 | 0.044 | 2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.001 | 1 | |||||
| 194 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.019 | 3 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | |||||
| 282 | 0.023 | 3 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.004 | 1 | |||||
| 729 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | |||||
| 1304 | 0.005 | 1 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.001 | 2 | |||||
| 1601 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.006 | 2 | 0.01 | 3 | |||||
| 1697 | 0.009 | 1 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | |||||
| 9 | Proteobacteria | Enterobacteriaceae | Several | Gamma-E1 | Core | 0.34 | 6 | 1.095 | 10 | 1.69 | 10 | 0.23 | 8 | 0.23 | 10 |
| 19 | Several | Gamma-E2 | Core | 0.18 | 7 | 0.44 | 10 | 0.19 | 8 | 0.01 | 3 | 6.14 | 7 | ||
| 1 | Neisseriaceae | Beta | Core | 4.10 | 8 | 6.40 | 10 | 33.10 | 10 | 50.01 | 10 | 24.43 | 10 | ||
| 2 | Orbaceae | Gamma-1 | Core | 2.91 | 8 | 29.97 | 10 | 18.38 | 10 | 42.39 | 10 | 36.32 | 10 | ||
a According to Cariveau et al. [26] and Meeus et al. [27]. Additionally, all other Lactobacillaceae en Bifidobacteriaceae OTUs found in this study are reported.
b Nearest neighbor based on a BLAST search in GenBank against type strains. Percentage of sequence identity (on a total of 250 bp) is reported between brackets.
c As used by Meeus et al. [27].
d Mean relative abundance, calculated based on specimens containing the respective OTU.
Fig 4Pathogen incidence (%) in bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris) from five different locations.
Sampled locations represent two habitat types, including forest (S1-F and S2-F) and urbanized habitats (S3-U, S4-U and S5-U).
Fig 5Probability of infection by Nosema bombi in function of the relative abundance of Snodgrassella.
Presence of Nosema is negatively and significantly (P < 0.001) related to the relative abundance of Snodgrassella.