Literature DB >> 30359191

Lack of Cardiac Improvement After Cardiosphere-Derived Cell Transplantation in Aging Mouse Hearts.

Zhen-Ao Zhao1,2, Xinglong Han1,2, Wei Lei1,2, Jingjing Li1,2, Zhuangzhuang Yang1, Jie Wu1, Mengchao Yao3, Xing-Ai Lu1, Lingjuan He4, Yihuan Chen1,2, Bin Zhou4, Shijun Hu1,2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Aging is one of the most significant risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, and the incidence of myocardial ischemia increases dramatically with age. Some studies have reported that cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) could benefit the injured heart. Nevertheless, the convincing evidence on CDC-induced improvement of aging heart is still limited.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we tested whether the CDCs isolated from neonatal mice could benefit cardiac function in aging mice. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We evaluated cardiac function of PBS- (n=15) and CDC-injected (n=19) aging mice. Echocardiography indicated that left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (57.46%±3.57% versus 57.86%±2.44%) and LV fraction shortening (30.67%±2.41% versus 30.51%±1.78%) showed similar values in PBS- and CDC-injected mice. The diastolic wall thickness of LV was significantly increased after CDC injection, resulting in reduced diastolic LV volume. The pulse-wave Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging indicated that aging mice receiving PBS or CDC injection presented similar values of the peak early transmitral flow velocity, the peak late transmitral flow velocity, the ratio of the peak early transmitral flow velocity to the peak late transmitral flow velocity, and the ratio of the peak early transmitral flow velocity to the peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity, respectively. Pressure-volume loop experiment indicated that the LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship and end-systolic pressure-volume relationship were comparable in both PBS- and CDC-injected mice. Postmortem analysis of aging mouse hearts showed similar fibrotic degree in the 2 groups. In addition, the aging markers showed comparable expression levels in both PBS- and CDC-injected mice. The systemic aging performance measures, including exercise capacity, hair regrowth capacity, and inflammation, showed no significant improvement in CDC-injected mice. Finally, the telomere length was comparable between PBS- and CDC-injected mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results indicate that CDCs do not improve heart function and systemic performances in aging mice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; echocardiography; mice; myocardial ischemia; stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30359191     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  11 in total

1.  Letter by Ibrahim et al Regarding Article, "Lack of Cardiac Improvement After Cardiosphere-Derived Cell Transplantation in Aging Mouse Hearts".

Authors:  Ahmed Ibrahim; Lilian Grigorian-Shamagian; Russell G Rogers; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Heart Regeneration by Endogenous Stem Cells and Cardiomyocyte Proliferation: Controversy, Fallacy, and Progress.

Authors:  Reza Ardehali; Bin Zhou; Lingjuan He; Ngoc B Nguyen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Perspectives on Directions and Priorities for Future Preclinical Studies in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Lilian Grigorian Shamagian; Rosalinda Madonna; Doris Taylor; Andreu M Climent; Felipe Prosper; Luis Bras-Rosario; Antoni Bayes-Genis; Péter Ferdinandy; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte; Valentin Fuster; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte therapy in mouse permanent ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion models.

Authors:  You Yu; Nianci Qin; Xing-Ai Lu; Jingjing Li; Xinglong Han; Xuan Ni; Lingqun Ye; Zhenya Shen; Weiqian Chen; Zhen-Ao Zhao; Wei Lei; Shijun Hu
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.832

5.  Dichotomy between the transcriptomic landscape of naturally versus accelerated aged murine hearts.

Authors:  Federica De Majo; Jana-Charlotte Hegenbarth; Frank Rühle; Christian Bär; Thomas Thum; Martine de Boer; Dirk J Duncker; Blanche Schroen; Anne-Sophie Armand; Monika Stoll; Leon J De Windt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Cardiac Cell Therapy: Insights into the Mechanisms of Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Hsuan Peng; Kazuhiro Shindo; Renée R Donahue; Ahmed Abdel-Latif
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Cardiac Aging: From Basic Research to Therapeutics.

Authors:  Mingjing Yan; Shenghui Sun; Kun Xu; Xiuqing Huang; Lin Dou; Jing Pang; Weiqing Tang; Tao Shen; Jian Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Growth differentiation factor 11 attenuates cardiac ischemia reperfusion injury via enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and telomerase activity.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Guangjin Luo; Yameng Liu; Hairuo Lin; Cankun Zheng; Dongxiao Xie; Yingqi Zhu; Lu Chen; Xiaoxia Huang; Donghong Hu; Jiahe Xie; Zhenhuan Chen; Wangjun Liao; Jianping Bin; Qiancheng Wang; Yulin Liao
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  The Intrapericardial Delivery of Extracellular Vesicles from Cardiosphere-Derived Cells Stimulates M2 Polarization during the Acute Phase of Porcine Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Esther López; Rebeca Blázquez; Federica Marinaro; Verónica Álvarez; Virginia Blanco; Claudia Báez; Irene González; Ana Abad; Beatriz Moreno; Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo; Verónica Crisóstomo; Javier García Casado
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  Single-cell transcriptomics of cardiac progenitors reveals functional subpopulations and their cooperative crosstalk in cardiac repair.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Hongjie Zhang; Jingyi Cui; Lijuan Pei; Shiqi Huang; Yaning Mao; Zhongmin Liu; Ke Wei; Hongming Zhu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 14.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.