BACKGROUND: Inhaled chemotherapeutics may enhance pulmonary drug exposure to malignant lesions in the lung without substantially contributing to systemic toxicities. The pharmacokinetic profile of inhaled submicron particle paclitaxel (NanoPac®) in healthy rodent plasma and lung tissue is evaluated here to determine administration proof-of-principle. METHODS: Healthy male Sprague Dawley rats received paclitaxel in one of three arms: intravenous nab-paclitaxel at 2.9 mg/kg (IVnP), inhaled NanoPac low dose (IHNP-LD) at 0.38 mg/kg, or inhaled NanoPac high dose (IHNP-HD) at 1.18 mg/kg. Plasma and lung tissue paclitaxel concentrations were determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry from animals sacrificed at 10 time points ranging up to 2 weeks after administration. Peak concentration (Cmax), apparent residence half-life (T1/2), exposure (AUC(last)), and dose-normalized exposure (AUCD(last)) were determined. Pulmonary histopathology was performed on rats sacrificed at the 336-hour time point. RESULTS: Paclitaxel was detectable and quantifiable in the rat lung for both inhaled NanoPac arms sampled at the final necropsy, 336 hours postadministration. Substantial paclitaxel deposition and retention resulted in an order of magnitude increase in dose-normalized pulmonary exposure over IVnP. Inhaled NanoPac arms had an order of magnitude lower plasma Cmax than IVnP, but followed a similar plasma T1/2 clearance (quantifiable only to 72 hours postadministration). Pulmonary histopathology found all treated animals indistinguishable from treatment-naive rats. CONCLUSION: In the rodent model, inhaled NanoPac demonstrated substantial deposition and retention of paclitaxel in sampled lung tissue. Further research to determine NanoPac's toxicity profile and potential efficacy as lung cancer therapy is underway.
BACKGROUND: Inhaled chemotherapeutics may enhance pulmonary drug exposure to malignant lesions in the lung without substantially contributing to systemic toxicities. The pharmacokinetic profile of inhaled submicron particle paclitaxel (NanoPac®) in healthy rodent plasma and lung tissue is evaluated here to determine administration proof-of-principle. METHODS: Healthy male Sprague Dawley rats received paclitaxel in one of three arms: intravenous nab-paclitaxel at 2.9 mg/kg (IVnP), inhaled NanoPac low dose (IHNP-LD) at 0.38 mg/kg, or inhaled NanoPac high dose (IHNP-HD) at 1.18 mg/kg. Plasma and lung tissue paclitaxel concentrations were determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry from animals sacrificed at 10 time points ranging up to 2 weeks after administration. Peak concentration (Cmax), apparent residence half-life (T1/2), exposure (AUC(last)), and dose-normalized exposure (AUCD(last)) were determined. Pulmonary histopathology was performed on rats sacrificed at the 336-hour time point. RESULTS:Paclitaxel was detectable and quantifiable in the rat lung for both inhaled NanoPac arms sampled at the final necropsy, 336 hours postadministration. Substantial paclitaxel deposition and retention resulted in an order of magnitude increase in dose-normalized pulmonary exposure over IVnP. Inhaled NanoPac arms had an order of magnitude lower plasma Cmax than IVnP, but followed a similar plasma T1/2 clearance (quantifiable only to 72 hours postadministration). Pulmonary histopathology found all treated animals indistinguishable from treatment-naive rats. CONCLUSION: In the rodent model, inhaled NanoPac demonstrated substantial deposition and retention of paclitaxel in sampled lung tissue. Further research to determine NanoPac's toxicity profile and potential efficacy as lung cancer therapy is underway.
Authors: Jeffrey S Tepper; Philip J Kuehl; Stuart Cracknell; Kristen J Nikula; Luqi Pei; James D Blanchard Journal: Int J Toxicol Date: 2016-02-07 Impact factor: 2.032
Authors: David J Alexander; Christopher J Collins; Derek W Coombs; Ian S Gilkison; Colin J Hardy; Graham Healey; George Karantabias; Neil Johnson; Anna Karlsson; Joanne D Kilgour; Paddy McDonald Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Stephen K Williamson; Gary A Johnson; Holly A Maulhardt; Kathleen M Moore; D S McMeekin; Thomas K Schulz; Gregory A Reed; Katherine F Roby; Christine B Mackay; Holly J Smith; Scott J Weir; Jo A Wick; Maurie Markman; Gere S diZerega; Michael J Baltezor; Jahna Espinosa; Charles J Decedue Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Paul Zarogoulidis; Kaid Darwiche; Leslie Krauss; Haidong Huang; George A Zachariadis; Anna Katsavou; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Antonis Papaiwannou; Thomas J Vogl; Lutz Freitag; George Stamatis; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: James Verco; William Johnston; Michael Frost; Michael Baltezor; Philip J Kuehl; Anita Lopez; Andrew Gigliotti; Steven A Belinsky; Ronald Wolff; Gere diZerega Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 2.849
Authors: Shelagh Verco; Holly Maulhardt; Michael Baltezor; Emily Williams; Marc Iacobucci; Alison Wendt; James Verco; Alyson Marin; Sam Campbell; Paul Dorman; Gere diZerega Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 4.617
Authors: Mellissa Gomez; Mushtaq Ahmed; Shibali Das; Joseph McCollum; Leah Mellett; Rosemary Swanson; Ananya Gupta; Nicholas B Carrigy; Hui Wang; David Barona; Shital Bachchhav; Alana Gerhardt; Chris Press; Michelle C Archer; Hong Liang; Emilie Seydoux; Ryan M Kramer; Philip J Kuehl; Reinhard Vehring; Shabaana A Khader; Christopher B Fox Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 5.810