Literature DB >> 22452356

Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.

Jonathan Ledermann1, Philipp Harter, Charlie Gourley, Michael Friedlander, Ignace Vergote, Gordon Rustin, Clare Scott, Werner Meier, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Tamar Safra, Daniela Matei, Euan Macpherson, Claire Watkins, James Carmichael, Ursula Matulonis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olaparib (AZD2281) is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study to evaluate maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and had had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive olaparib, at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.
RESULTS: Of 265 patients who underwent randomization, 136 were assigned to the olaparib group and 129 to the placebo group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with olaparib than with placebo (median, 8.4 months vs. 4.8 months from randomization on completion of chemotherapy; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses of progression-free survival showed that, regardless of subgroup, patients in the olaparib group had a lower risk of progression. Adverse events more commonly reported in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (by more than 10% of patients) were nausea (68% vs. 35%), fatigue (49% vs. 38%), vomiting (32% vs. 14%), and anemia (17% vs. 5%); the majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. An interim analysis of overall survival (38% maturity, meaning that 38% of the patients had died) showed no significant difference between groups (hazard ratio with olaparib, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.39; P=0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib as maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival among patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Interim analysis showed no overall survival benefit. The toxicity profile of olaparib in this population was consistent with that in previous studies. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00753545.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22452356     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  584 in total

Review 1.  Investigational agents in development for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shannon N Westin; Thomas J Herzog; Robert L Coleman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: on the horizon of tailored and personalized therapies for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Elena S Ratner; Alan C Sartorelli; Z Ping Lin
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Management of Ovarian Neoplasms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Selective Targeting of Cyclin E1-Amplified High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer by Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 and AKT Inhibition.

Authors:  George Au-Yeung; Franziska Lang; Walid J Azar; Chris Mitchell; Kate E Jarman; Kurt Lackovic; Diar Aziz; Carleen Cullinane; Richard B Pearson; Linda Mileshkin; Danny Rischin; Alison M Karst; Ronny Drapkin; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; David D L Bowtell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Sequence-Specific Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Phase I/Ib Study of Olaparib Tablets and Carboplatin in Women's Cancer.

Authors:  Jung-Min Lee; Cody J Peer; Minshu Yu; Lauren Amable; Nicolas Gordon; Christina M Annunziata; Nicole Houston; Andrew K L Goey; Tristan M Sissung; Bernard Parker; Lori Minasian; Victoria L Chiou; Robert F Murphy; Brigitte C Widemann; William D Figg; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Quality of life trajectories after diagnosis of gynecologic cancer: a theoretically based approach.

Authors:  Brian D Gonzalez; Sharon L Manne; Jerod Stapleton; Shannon Myers-Virtue; Melissa Ozga; David Kissane; Carolyn Heckman; Mark Morgan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Rational combination therapy with PARP and MEK inhibitors capitalizes on therapeutic liabilities in RAS mutant cancers.

Authors:  Chaoyang Sun; Yong Fang; Jun Yin; Jian Chen; Zhenlin Ju; Dong Zhang; Xiaohua Chen; Christopher P Vellano; Kang Jin Jeong; Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng; Agda Karina B Eterovic; Neil H Bhola; Yiling Lu; Shannon N Westin; Jennifer R Grandis; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Kenneth L Scott; Guang Peng; Joan Brugge; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Genomic consequences of aberrant DNA repair mechanisms stratify ovarian cancer histotypes.

Authors:  Yi Kan Wang; Ali Bashashati; Michael S Anglesio; Dawn R Cochrane; Diljot S Grewal; Gavin Ha; Andrew McPherson; Hugo M Horlings; Janine Senz; Leah M Prentice; Anthony N Karnezis; Daniel Lai; Mohamed R Aniba; Allen W Zhang; Karey Shumansky; Celia Siu; Adrian Wan; Melissa K McConechy; Hector Li-Chang; Alicia Tone; Diane Provencher; Manon de Ladurantaye; Hubert Fleury; Aikou Okamoto; Satoshi Yanagida; Nozomu Yanaihara; Misato Saito; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Marco A Marra; C Blake Gilks; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; David G Huntsman; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  PARP Inhibitors in Gynecologic Cancers: What Is the Next Big Development?

Authors:  Michelle Lightfoot; Lauren Montemorano; Kristin Bixel
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Ovarian cancer-associated mutations disable catalytic activity of CDK12, a kinase that promotes homologous recombination repair and resistance to cisplatin and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.

Authors:  Poorval M Joshi; Shari L Sutor; Catherine J Huntoon; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.