| Literature DB >> 30357067 |
Patricia Simonetti1, Laura Garcia Vasconcelos1, Jeanne Oiticica1.
Abstract
Introduction Music-based sound therapies become recently a trend in the treatment of tinnitus. Few publications have studied the therapeutic use of fractal tones to treat chronic tinnitus. Objective The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of using fractal tones as a unique sound therapy for chronic tinnitus sufferers. Methods Twelve participants were recruited; however, six could not be assigned. At baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months, the participants were provided with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA) questionnaires, and their visual analog scale score was recorded. Tinnitus pitch and loudness matching was performed before fitting and after 6 months of use. Results The visual analog scale (VAS) score, pitch and loudness matching and minimal masking levels did not result in significant improvement at the end of the treatment. The mean THI measured at baseline was 45, and the final one was 25. A paired sample t -test showed that this 20-point difference was statistically significant. Conclusions We measured the benefits of using fractal tone therapy for the treatment of chronic tinnitus and found that most of the benefits were in the THI functional domain, which includes concentration, reading, attention, consciousness, sleep, social activities, and household tasks. For all patients with bothersome chronic tinnitus and high scores on the THI functional scale, fractal tones should be considered a promising initial sound therapy strategy. The findings from this open-label pilot study are preliminary, and further trials are needed before these results can be generalized to a larger tinnitus population.Entities:
Keywords: THI; fractal; music therapy; tinnitus
Year: 2018 PMID: 30357067 PMCID: PMC6197965 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1809-4864
Etiology of subjects
| Subjects | Etiology |
|---|---|
| 1 | Post-traumatic stress disorder |
| 2 | Metabolic syndrome |
| 3 | Endolymphatic hydrops |
| 4 | Otitis media |
| 5 | Idiopathic |
| 6 | Acoustic Trauma |
Fig. 1Audiograms of the six participants in the fractal study. Abbreviations: dB, decibels; LE, left ear; RE, right ear; SDT, speech detective threshold; SHT, speech hearing threshold; SRT, speech reception threshold.
Mean, standard deviation and loudness, pitch and minimum masking level values obtained at baseline and after 6 months
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7 | 5.6 | 9.8 | 7 | 6033 | 5240 | 8 | 7 |
|
| 0.8 | 1.3 | 6.2 | 2.9 | 4462 | 4708 | 6.3 | 4.7 |
|
| 0.1087 | 0.3796 | 0.3739 | 0.1302 | ||||
|
| No | No | No | No | ||||
Abbreviations: A0, at baseline; A6, after 6 months of device use; MSD, mean significant difference at p < 0.05; P, t -test p value; SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analog scale.
= measured in dBSL (decibels, that is, sensation level)
= measured in Hz.
Mean, standard deviation and differences for the THI and its subscales at baseline and after 6 months
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 45.17 | 25.60 | 18.17 | 8.40 | 17.7 | 10.80 | 9.83 | 6.40 |
|
| 11.84 | 4.77 | 6.46 | 0.89 | 4.02 | 1.78 | 4.21 | 3.28 |
|
| 0.0136 | 0.0245 | 0.0579 | 0.0743 | ||||
|
| Yes | Yes | No | No | ||||
Abbreviations: A0, at baseline; A6, after 6 months of device use; CS, catastrophic score; ES, emotional score; FS, functional score; MSD, mean significant difference at p < 0.05; P, t -test p value; SD, standard deviation; THI, tinnitus handicap inventory.
Fig. 2Tinnitus handicap inventory scores measured before and after 1, 3 and 6 months of fractal therapy. *, significant difference ( p < 0.05).
Fig. 3Tinnitus handicap inventory functional, emotional and catastrophic scores measured at baseline and after 6 months of fractal therapy. *, significant difference ( p < 0.05).